Article published In:
Pragmatic Interfaces
Edited by Louis de Saussure and Peter J. Schulz
[Pragmatics & Cognition 15:1] 2007
► pp. 161177
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Mohammed, Dima
2008. Institutional Insights for Analysing Strategic Manoeuvring in the British Prime Minister’s Question Time. Argumentation 22:3  pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Jan Alexis
2012. Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education 34:2  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Jan Alexis
2012. Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education 96:3  pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Jan Alexis
2012. Arguing from Nature: The role of ‘nature’ in students’ argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education 34:5  pp. 723 ff. DOI logo
Nielsen, Jan Alexis
2013. Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education. Research in Science Education 43:1  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Ricco, Robert B. & Anthony Sierra
2016. Judging the implications of a concession: Conversational distance and belief bias effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69:6  pp. 1129 ff. DOI logo
Ricco, Robert B. & Anthony Nelson Sierra
2011. Individual Differences in the Interpretation of Commitment in Argumentation. Argumentation 25:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Walsh, Lynda
2013. Resistance and Common Ground as Functions of Mis/aligned Attitudes. Written Communication 30:4  pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.