Review published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 16:1 (2008) ► pp. 203–213
Book review

Sol Azuelos-Atias. A Pragmatic Analysis of Legal Proofs of Criminal Intent
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. x + 180 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2716-4

Reviewed by
| Tel Aviv University
Published online: 07 April 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.1.17hav
References
Anscombre, J. -C. and Ducrot, O.
1989 “Argumentativity and informativity”. In M. Meyer (ed), From Metaphysics to Rhetoric. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A.
1987 Judicial Discretion. Tel Aviv: Papirus (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
1992 Interpretation in Law: The General Theory. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
1993 “Judicial philosophy and judicial activism”. Tel Aviv Law Review 171: 475–502.Google Scholar
2003 Purposive Interpretation in Law. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
2004 The Judge in a Democracy. Haifa/Jerusalem/Srigim-Leon: Haifa University Press, Keter Publishing House, Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Bertea, S.
2004 “Certainty, reasonableness and argumentation in law”. Argumentation 18(4): 465–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
1977 Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O.
1972 Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de Sémantique Linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., and Kruiger, T.
1987 Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Pragmatic and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
1972 Figures III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41–58.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. and Lederman, E.
1982 Principals of Criminal Responsibility. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Lodder, A. R.
2004 “Law, logic, rhetoric: A procedural model of legal argumentation.” In S. Rahman and J. Symons (eds), Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 569–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lotfipour-Saedi, K.
1990 “Discourse analysis and the problem of translation equivalence”. Meta 35(2): 389–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orr, C. W.
1942 “The problem of translation”. Music & Letters 22(4): 318–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sallis, J.
2002 On Translation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Salmond, J. W.
1966 On Jurisprudence, 12th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uspensky, B.
1973 A Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and Typology of Compositional Forms. Transl. V. Zavarin and S. Wittig. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D. N.
1990 “What is reasoning? What is an argument?”. The Journal of Philosophy 87(8): 399–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J. B.
1990 Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zaltzman, N.
2001 “’Factual Truth’ and ‘Legal Truth’”. Tel Aviv Law Review 241: 263–273 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar