The role of MPEs in common ground construction in institutional telephone interactions
Ping Liu | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Huiying Liu | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
This article examines the role of metapragmatic expressions (MPEs) in constructing common ground (CG) in the call taker’s responses to customer direct complaints in telephone interactions in the framework of the socio-cognitive approach proposed and developed by Kecskes (2008, 2010, 2013, 2017) and Kecskes and Zhang (2009, 2013). Based on five extracts drawn from the data of about two hours of 15 recordings of telephone interactions that include successful complaint settlements made between customers and the customer service department of one Chinese airline, it reveals that the call taker mainly employs five types of MPEs as CG construction devices to explicitly manifest intentions of giving accounts and explanations, confirming and checking information, negotiating adequate compensations, establishing close interpersonal relationships, and aligning with the organization. This article enhances our understanding of the functioning process of metapragmatic indicators in complaint settlement in institutional telephone interactions.
2012The pragmatic knowledge of Iranian EFL learners in using face keeping strategies in reaction to complaints at two different levels. English Language Teaching 5(2). 78–92.
Barr, Dale J.
2004Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary?Cognitive Science 28(6). 937–962.
Barr, Dale J. & Boaz Keysar
2005Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In Herbert L. Colston & Albert N. Katz (eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences, 21–43. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bippus, Amy M., Norah E. Dunbar & Shr-Jie Liu
2012Humorous responses to interpersonal complaints: Effects of humor style and nonverbal expression. The Journal of Psychology 146(4). 437–453.
Boxer, Diana
1993Social distance and speech behavior: The case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics 191. 103–125.
Caffi, Claudia
1984Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 81. 433–435.
Caffi, Claudia
1994Metapragmatics. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2461–2466. Elsevier.
Caffi, Claudia
2007Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chan, Alvin M.
2006The Chinese concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international business. Presentation at Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, Brisbane, Queensland.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H.
2009Context and common ground. In Jacob L. Mey (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, 116–119. Oxford: Elsevier.
Clark, Herbert H. & Susan E. Brennan
1991Grounding in communication. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149. Washington: APA Books.
Colston, Herbert L. & Albert N. Katz
(eds.)2005Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cruz, Manuel P.
2015Fostering EF/SL learners’ meta-pragmatic awareness of complaints and their interactive effects. Language Awareness 24(2). 123–137.
Dersley, Ian & Anthony J. Wootton
2000Complaint sequences within antagonistic arguments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33(4). 375–406.
Drew, Paul
1998Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3/4). 295–325.
Drew, Paul & Traci Walker2009Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 2400–2414.
Edwards, Derek
2005Moaning, whining and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies 7(1). 5–29.
Einwiller, Sabine A. & Sarah Steilen
2015Handling complaints on social network sites: An analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relations Review 411. 195–204.
Ekström, Mats & Fredrik Lundström
2014The termination of complaints in calls to an authority for student support. Journal of Pragmatics 741. 132–149.
Fan, Alei, Anna S. Mattilab & Xinyuan Zhao
2015How does social distance impact customers’ complaint intentions? A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Hospitality Management 471. 35–42.
Filip, Alina
2013Complaint management: A customer satisfaction learning process. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 931. 271–275.
Garín-Muñoz, Teresa, Teodosio Pérez-Amaral, Covadonga Gijón & Rafael López
2016Consumer complaint behavior in telecommunications: The case of mobile phone users in Spain. Telecommunications Policy 401. 804–820.
Giannoni, Davide S.
2014A comparison of British and Italian customer-complaint forms. English for Specific Purposes 341. 48–57.
Giora, Rachel
2003On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, Jerald
1990Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Barry M. Staw & Larry L. Cummings (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 121, 111–157. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Heinemann, Trine & Véronique Traverso
2009Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 2381–2384.
Holt, Elizabeth
2012Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(4). 430–448.
Hübler, Axel
2011Metapragmatics. In Wolfram Büblitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Foundations of pragmatics, 107–136. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.
Hübler, Axel & Wolfram Bublitz
2007Introducing metapragmatics in use. In Wolfram Büblitz & Axel Hübler (eds.), Metapragmatics in use, 1–26. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jefferson, Gail
1984On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies of conversation analysis, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kecskes, Istvan
2008Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40(3). 385–406.
Kecskes, Istvan
2010Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 2889–2897.
Kecskes, Istvan
2013Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kecskes, Istvan & Jacob L. Mey
2008Introduction. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 1–5. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kecskes, Istvan & Fenhui Zhang2013On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. In Alessandro Capone, Francolo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 375–395. Springer: New York.
Kecskes, Istvan
2017The interplay of recipient design and salience in shaping speaker’s utterance. In María de Ponte & Kepa Korta (eds.), Reference and representation in thought and language, 238–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2016The Chinese way of response to hospitality service failure: The effects of face and guanxi. International Journal of Hospitality Management 571. 18–29.
Liu, Ping & Yongping Ran
2016Creating meso-contexts: The functions of metapragmatic expressions in argumentative TV talk shows. Intercultural Pragmatics 13(2). 283–307.
Luo, Yadong
1997Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human Systems Management 16(1). 43–51.
Martínez-Flor, Alicia & Esther Usó-Juan
2015The role of instruction on EFL learners’ use of complaining apologizing semantic formulas. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2121. 23–28.
Mey, Jacob L.
2001Pragmatics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, Jacob L.
2008 “Impeach or exorcise?” Or, what’s in the (common) ground? In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 255–275. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
Migdadi, Fathi, Muhammad A. Badarneh & Kawakib Radwan Al-Momani
2012Public complaints and complaint responses in calls to a Jordanian radio phone-in program. Applied Linguistics 33(3). 321–341.
Monzoni, Chiara M.
2009Direct complaints in (Italian) calls to the ambulance: The use of negatively framed questions. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 2465–2478.
1978Compliment responses: Notes on the cooperation of multiple constraints. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79–112. New York: Academic Press.
Rader, M.
1977Complaint letters: When is conflicts with ought. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1988Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In Paul Drew & Anthony J. Wootton (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, 89–135. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selting, Margret
2012Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics 441. 387–415.
Silverstein, Michael
1993Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya
2008Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–37.
Traverso, Véronique2009The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 2385–2399.
Trosborg, Anna
1987Apology strategies in natives and non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics 111. 141–167.
Vande Kopple, William J.
1985Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36(1). 82–93.
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.
2013Culture’s impact on consumer complaining responses to embarrassing service failure. Journal of Business Research 66(3). 298–305.
Yilmaz, Cengiz, Kaan Varnali & Berna T. Kasnakoglu
2016How do firms benefit from customer complaints?Journal of Business Research 691. 944–955.
Zhang, Yi & Camilla Vásquez
2014Hotels’ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction. Discourse, Context and Media 61. 54–64.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Kecskes, Istvan, Olga Obdalova, Ludmila Minakova & Aleksandra Soboleva
2018. A study of the perception of situation-bound utterances as culture-specific pragmatic units by Russian learners of English. System 76 ► pp. 219 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.