Article published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 17:1 (2009) ► pp.146–175
Dimensions of evaluation
Cognitive and linguistic perspectives
In the past two decades or so, a number of researchers from various fields within linguistics have turned their attention to interpersonal phenomena, such as the linguistic expression of speaker opinion or evaluation (also called stance or appraisal), or the encoding of subjectivity in language and its diachronic development (subjectification/subjectivization). Many linguists have offered categorizations of evaluative meaning, based on authentic discourse data, but no connection has been made with cognitive approaches to appraisal processes. This paper offers a first meta-theoretical exploration of such issues. It compares dimensions of evaluation that have been identified in linguistic and cognitive studies, and also examines how psychological research into basic emotions can be related to linguistic research on affect. On the basis of these comparisons a proposal for a new classification of evaluative meanings is made. The focus of this paper is on only one aspect of the highly complex phenomenon of evaluation, namely potential evaluative dimensions, although other relevant issues will also be touched upon, including the pragmatics of evaluation (evaluation and context).
Keywords: affect, appraisal, basic emotions, cognition, emotion, evaluative meaning, evaluation, stance
Cited by
Cited by 28 other publications
Alba-Juez, Laura
2016. The variables of the evaluative functional relationship. In Metapragmatics of Humor [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 14], ► pp. 11 ff. 
Alba-Juez, Laura & Salvatore Attardo
2014. The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 93 ff.
Alba-Juez, Laura & Geoff Thompson
2014. The many faces and phases of evaluation. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 3 ff.
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2022. Assessments and actions: Instances from Arabic broadcast political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 211 ff.
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2019. Chapter 12. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 301 ff.
Breeze, Ruth
Damholdt, Malene Flensborg, Vestergaard Christina, Anna Kryvous, Catharina Vesterager Smedegaard & Johanna Seibt
2019. What is in three words? Exploring a three-word methodology for assessing impressions of a social robot encounter online and in real life. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10:1 ► pp. 438 ff.
DeCoursey, C.A.
2012. Trialing cartoons: Teachers’ attitudes towards animation as an ELT instructional tool. Computers & Education 59:2 ► pp. 436 ff.
DeCoursey, Christina A. & Aliaa N. Hamad
2019. Emotions across the essay: What second-language writers feel across four weeks’ writing a research essay. English Studies at NBU 5:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Ding, Jiaolong & Guangwu Feng
2022. A neo-Gricean speaker-belief-based analysis of Chinese evaluatives. Journal of Pragmatics 200 ► pp. 227 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
2018. Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society 29:5 ► pp. 514 ff.
Giannoni, Davide Simone
2016. An Investigation of Value Claims in Academic and Corporate ‘About us’ Texts. Applied Linguistics ► pp. amw010 ff.
Haupt, Jaromír
2014. Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 53 ff.
Herman, Thierry & Diane Liberatore
2022. When Evaluative Adjectives Prevent Contradiction in a Debate. Argumentation 36:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Kovtun, Oksana
2020. СЕМАНТИКО-ПРАГМАТИЧНИЙ ПОТЕНЦІАЛ АКСІОЛОГІЧНОЇ ПОТУЖНОСТІ АНГЛІЙСЬКОГО ПРИКМЕТНИКА: ПСИХОЛОГІЯ СПРИЙНЯТТЯ В ПРОЦЕСІ ВИВЧЕННЯ АНГЛІЙСЬКОЇ МОВИ ЯК ІНОЗЕМНОЇ. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World 15 ► pp. 122 ff.
2020. СЕМАНТИКО-ПРАГМАТИЧНИЙ ПОТЕНЦІАЛ АКСІОЛОГІЧНОЇ ПОТУЖНОСТІ АНГЛІЙСЬКОГО ПРИКМЕТНИКА: ПСИХОЛОГІЯ СПРИЙНЯТТЯ В ПРОЦЕСІ ВИВЧЕННЯ АНГЛІЙСЬКОЇ МОВИ ЯК ІНОЗЕМНОЇ. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World 15 ► pp. 122 ff.
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
2020. Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:4 ► pp. 471 ff.
2022. I wanted to honour your journal, and you spat in my face: emotive (im)politeness and face in the English and Russian blind peer review. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Li, Ya-Ying, Fang-Hao Song, Yan Liu & Yong Wang
2022. Cognitive Preference Performance of In-Vehicle Human–Machine Interface Icons under Female New Energy Vehicles. Sustainability 14:22 ► pp. 14759 ff.
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
2019. Emotionalität von Texten aus kognitionslinguistischer Perspektive. In Emotionen, ► pp. 403 ff.
SOKOLOVA, M. & G. LAPALME
2011. Learning opinions in user-generated web content. Natural Language Engineering 17:4 ► pp. 541 ff.
Soler Gallego, Silvia
2020. Defining subjectivity in visual art audio description. Meta 64:3 ► pp. 708 ff.
Song, Jiannan
2021. Appraising with Metaphors: A Case Study of the Strategic Ritual for Invoking Journalistic Emotions in News Reporting of the China–US Trade Disputes. Critical Arts 35:5-6 ► pp. 179 ff.
Vertommen, Bram
2022. The strategic value of pronominal choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff.
Vertommen, Bram, Astrid Vandendaele & Ellen Van Praet
2012. Towards a multidimensional approach to journalistic stance. Analyzing foreign media coverage of Belgium. Discourse, Context & Media 1:2-3 ► pp. 123 ff.
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Wei, Yipu, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted M. Sanders & Willem M. Mak
2021. The Role of Connectives and Stance Markers in the Processing of Subjective Causal Relations. Discourse Processes 58:8 ► pp. 766 ff.
Ковтун, О. В.
2021. СЕМАНТИКО-ПРАГМАТИЧНИЙ ПОТЕНЦІАЛ АКСІОЛОГІЧНОЇ ПОТУЖНОСТІ АНГЛІЙСЬКОГО ПРИКМЕТНИКА: ПСИХОЛОГІЯ ЙОГО СПРИЙНЯТТЯ В ПРОЦЕСІ ВИВЧЕННЯ АНГЛІЙСЬКОЇ МОВИ ЯК ІНОЗЕМНОЇ. Лінгвістичні дослідження 2:54 ► pp. 141 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.