Cover not available
Review published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 17:2 (2009) ► pp.464–471
Book review

Douglas Walton. Dialog Theory for Critical Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2007. xviii + 307 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 1885 8Hardcover 978 90 272 9200 1e-Book

Reviewed by
| University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland,
Published online: 18 August 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.14sau
References (14)
References
Bach, K. 1994. “Converzational impliciture”. Mind and Language 91: 124–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bench-Capon, T. 2002. “Agreeing to differ: Modelling persuasive dialogue between parties with different values”. Informal logic 221: 231–245.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. and Grootendorst, R. 1996. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (ed). 2002. Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and converzation”. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
1971. “Mathematical models of dialogue”. Theoria 371: 130–155. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1979 [1907]. Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. and Asher, N. 1993. “Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment”. Linguistics and Philosophy 161: 437–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. 1972. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995 [1986]. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar