Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp. 337362


Blakemore, Diane
1996Are apposition markers discourse markers? Journal of Linguistics 321, 325–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Restatement and exemplification: A relevance theoretic re-assessment of elaboration. Pragmatics & Cognition 5(1), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Discourse markers. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 221–240. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 141. 383–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6(2). 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311. 931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein
2001In defence of monosemy. In Németh T. Enikő & Károly Bibok (eds.), Pragmatics and the flexibility of word meaning, 79–115. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hasunuma, Akiko
1995Danwa setuzoku go datte ni tuite (On the discourse conjunction datte). Himeji Dokkyo Daigaku Gaikokugo Gakubu Kiyo 41. 265–281.Google Scholar
1997 Datte to demo – Toritate to setuzoku no kankei ( Datte and demo: Correlation between designation and connection). Himeji Dokkyo Daigaku Gaikokugo Gakubu Kiyo 61. 197–217.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2006Japanese (Revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Yoko
2010Hanashi Kotoba ni okeru Inyou Hyougen (Quote representations in spoken language). Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2007From temporal to contrastive and causal: The emergence of connective after all . In Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds.), Connectives as discourse landmarks, 89–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo
1988From bound grammatical markers to free discourse markers: History of some Japanese connectives. Berkeley Linguistic Society 141. 340–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko K.
1993Kaiwa bunseki (Conversation analysis). Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
2000Joi no gengogaku (Linguistics of emotion). Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko
1994Functions of the connective datte in Japanese conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 41. 147–163.Google Scholar
Murillo, Silvia
2004A relevance reassessment of reformulation markers. Journal of Pragmatics 361. 2059–2068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
2002Ninchi gengogaku (Cognitive linguistics). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
2005Nihongo no bunpoka kenkyu ni atatte – Gaikan to rironteki kadai (On the studies of the grammaticalization of Japanese – Overview and theoretical task). Nihongo no Kenkyu 1(3). 1–17.Google Scholar
Oki, Yuko
1996Taiwagata setuzokushi ni okeru shoryaku no kikou to gyakusetu – datte to nazenara, demo  – (The mechanism of deletion and contradiction in interactive conjunctions – datte to nazenara, demo  –). In Osamu Nakajo (ed.), Ronshu kotoba to kyouiku (Essays: Language and education), 97–111. Tokyo: Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
2006Nihongo danwa ron (The theory of Japanese discourse). Tokyo: Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
Otsu, Takahiro
2018Multifuctionality of ‘after all’: A unitary account. Journal of Pragmatics 1341. 102–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary
, 2nd edn. 1989 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
[1986]1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tada, Tomoko
2012Fukujoshi no gainen to toritatejoshi no gainen (The concepts of adverbial particles and focus particles). Aoyama Gobun 421. 69–87.Google Scholar
Takiura, Masato
2003 Datte no goyouron: Enzanshi ga oshieru mono (Pragmatics of datte: What operators tell). Gekkan Gengo 32(3). 33–39.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroaki
1997 In other words and conversational implicature. Pragmatics 71. 367–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1997The discourse connective after all: A historical pragmatic account. Paper presented at the Sixteenth International Congress of Linguists, Paris, July 1997.
2004Historical pragmatics. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 539–561. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011The conceptual-procedural distinction: Past, present and future. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Handout 5: Semantics, pragmatics and the conceptual-procedural distinction. GIST (Generative Initiatives in Syntactic Theory, Wilson Seminar). University of Gent. November 2012.Google Scholar
Yamada, Daisuke
2006 Datte no imiron (The semantics of datte ). Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Pragmatics Society, 129–136.Google Scholar

Data references

BNC = The British National Corpus
Women = Gendai Nihongo Kenkyukai (ed.) 1998Josei no kotoba – Shokuba hen (Women’s Language: Office edition). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Men = Gendai Nihongo Kenkyukai (ed.) 2002Dansei no kotoba – Shokuba hen (Men’s Language: Office edition). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar