Article published in:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 3049
References

References

Adamson, Sylvia
1989With double tongue: Diglossia, stylistics and the teaching of English. In Mick Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 204–240. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Alexander, Marc & Christian Kay
2014The spread of RED in the Historical Thesaurus of English. In Wendy Anderson, Carole P. Biggam, Carole Hough & Christian Kay (eds.), Colour studies: A broad spectrum, 126–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Amoia, Marilisa & Jose Manuel Martinez
2013Using comparable collections of historical texts for building a diachronic dictionary for spelling normalization. In Piroska Lendvai & Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities (LaTeCH 2013), 84–89. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baron, Alistair, Paul Rayson & Dawn Archer
2009Automatic standardization of spelling for historical text mining. In Claire Warwick (ed.), Digital Humanities 2009: Conference abstracts, 309–312. College Park, MD: Maryland Institute for Technology in the Humanities.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2001Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Steven, Ewan Klein & Edward Loper
2009Natural language processing with Python: Analyzing text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte
2007Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Philip R.
2013MorphAdorner v2: A Java library for the morphological adornment of English language texts. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://​morphadorner​.northwestern​.edu​/morphadorner/ (19 May 2018)[ p. 48 ]
CEEC. Corpora of Early English Correspondence
. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg et al. at the Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/CEEC/ (19 May 2018)
Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo
2012The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics), 332–352. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Andrea Nini & Diansheng Guo
2017Analyzing lexical emergence in Modern American English online. English Language and Linguistics 21(1). 99–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2004Using the OED quotations database as a corpus – a linguistic appraisal. ICAME Journal 28. 17–30.Google Scholar
Kaislaniemi, Samuli
2018The Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension (CEECE). In Terttu Nevalainen, Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds.), Patterns of change in 18th-century English: A sociolinguistic approach (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8), 45–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kaunisto, Mark
2013Scare quotes and glosses: Indicators of lexical innovation with affixed derivatives. In Roderick W. McConchie, Teo Juvonen, Mark Kaunisto, Minna Nevala & Jukka Tyrkkö (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 3), 97–106. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kay, Christian, Jane Roberts, Michael Samuels & Irené Wotherspoon
(eds.) 2009Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press. http://​www​.oed​.com​/thesaurus (19 May 2018)
Miller, George A.
1995WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38(11). 39–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, III: 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OED. Oxford English Dictionary
. OED Online. Oxford University Press. http://​www​.oed​.com (19 May 2018)
Palander-Collin, Minna & Mikko Hakala
2011Standardized versions of the Corpora of Early English Correspondence. Corpus Resource Database (CoRD). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/CEEC​/standardized​.html (19 May 2018)
PCEEC
2006Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, tagged version. Annotated by Arja Nurmi, Ann Taylor, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk, and Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/CoRD​/corpora​/CEEC/ (19 May 2018.)
Philips, Lawrence
2000The double metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ Users Journal 18(6). 38–43.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2003Word-formation in English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette
2007Tracing lexical productivity and creativity in the British media: ‘The chavs and the chav-nots’. In Judith Munat (ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 58), 61–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref[ p. 49 ]Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja
2014Sociolinguistic variation in English derivational productivity: Studies and methods in diachronic corpus linguistics (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XCIV). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja & Jukka Suomela
2017 types 2: Exploring word-frequency differences in corpora. In Turo Hiltunen, Joe McVeigh & Tanja Säily (eds.), Big and rich data in English corpus linguistics: Methods and explorations (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 19). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/19​/saily​_suomela/ (19 May 2018)
Säily, Tanja, Jukka Suomela & Eetu Mäkelä
In preparation. Variation in morphological productivity in the history of English: The case of -er .
Scherrer, Yves & Tomaž Erjavec
2016Modernising historical Slovene words. Natural Language Engineering 22(6). 881–905. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kerremans, Daphné, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2018. Using data-mining to identify and study patterns in lexical innovation on the web. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Nevalainen, Terttu
2018. From speaker innovation to lexical change. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1  pp. 8 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.