Is up always good and down always bad?
From linguistic to conceptual orientational metaphors in Arabic
The current study investigates Arabic orientational metaphors in Modern Standard Arabic. Specifically, it is a corpus-based study that tries to retrieve conceptual orientational metaphors of up-down, front-back, right-left, and central-peripheral spatial orientation. The study assumes that every orientation can be described using a set of different lexemes, and these lexemes express different linguistic orientational metaphors with different levels of usage frequency. It is hypothesized that studying the relationships between these lexemes, their etymologies, and frequency can provide a detailed, integrative account of metaphorical aspects and conceptual systems related to each spatial orientation. A bottom-up methodology to identify metaphorical usages of spatial lexemes was applied to the Stanford Arabic Corpus. The results list the spatial linguistic metaphors comprising conceptual metaphors and show for each orientation that mapping orientations onto conceptual metaphors is a complicated process, which integrates linguistic and cognitive levels. The cognitive-perceptual and cultural implications of these findings are discussed.
- 2.Orientational metaphors
- 3.Basic questions and hypotheses
- 4.Methodology and procedures
- 5.1 up-down
- 5.2 front-back
- 5.3 right-left
- 5.4 center-periphery
- 6.1 up-down spatial orientation
- 6.2 front-back spatial orientation
- 6.3 right-left spatial orientation
- 6.4 center-peripheral spatial orientation
Published online: 25 November 2019
De la Fuente, Juanma, Julio Santiago, Antonio Roman, Cristina G. Dumitrache & Daniel Casasanto
Dunning, Ted E.
Gibbs, Raymond & Ana Cristina Macedo
2010 Metaphor and embodied cognition. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 261. 679–700. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.phpscript=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-44502010000300014&lng=en&nrm=iso>(18 November 2017) doi:
Green, Spence & Christopher Manning
. UCREL Significance Test System. Lancaster University. Available at http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/sigtest/ (23 November 2017).
Hong, Tian, Xianyou He, Richard Tillman, Xueru Zhao & Yumei Deng
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bŭsta, Miloš Jacubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
Majid, Asif, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson
2016 Orientational metaphors in English, German, and Egyptian-Arabic: A comparative study with comments on the underlying theoretical basis. A paper presented in The Metaphors: Retrospect and Prospects Conference . Genoa, Italy. May 22.
Semino, Elena & Zsófia Demjen
Speer, Robert & Catherine Havasi
2012 Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012).
Steen, Gerard J.
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr & Trijntje Pasma
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.