Article published in:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 829


Algeo, John
1998Vocabulary. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 4, 1776–1997, 57–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles
1997Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Antoinette Renouf
1996Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72. 69–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald, Fabian Tomaschek, Susanne Gahl & Michael Ramscar
2017The ecclesiastes principle in language change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 21–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte
2007Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, George
1776The philosophy of rhetoric, vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark & Don Chapman
2016The effect of representativeness and size in historical corpora: An empirical study of changes in lexical frequency. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language VII: Generalizing vs. particularizing methodologies in historical linguistic analysis, 131–150. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Durkin, Philip
2014Borrowed words: A history of loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref[ p. 27 ]Google Scholar
Elliott, Ward E. Y. & Robert J. Valenza
2011Shakespeare’s vocabulary: Did it dwarf all others? In Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language: Transdisciplinary approaches, 34–57. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fischer, Roswitha
1998Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan, Justyna A. Robinson, Marc Alexander, Iona C. Hine, Seth Mehl & Fraser Dallachy
2017Linguistic DNA: Investigating conceptual change in Early Modern English discourse. Studia Neophilologica 89:sup1. 21–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garner, Brian
1982Shakespeare’s Latinate neologisms. Shakespeare Studies 15. 149–170.Google Scholar
Goodland, Giles
2011‘Strange deliveries’: Contextualising Shakespeare’s first citations in the OED . In Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language: Transdisciplinary approaches, 8–33. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Kaisa
1994Agricolasta nykykieleen: Suomen kirjakielen historia. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
2004–2005Nykysuomen etymologinen sanakirja, 2 vols. Juva: WSOY.Google Scholar
2018Suomi on kuuden kerroksen kieli. Tiede 1/2018 36–43.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri
1979Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. 4th ed. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
Huumo, Katja, Lea Laitinen & Outi Paloposki
(eds.) 2004Yhteistä kieltä tekemässä: Näkökulmia suomen kirjakielen kehitykseen 1800-luvulla. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Iivonen, Antti, Terttu Nevalainen, Reijo Aulanko & Hannu Kaskinen
1987Puheen intonaatio. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz
1967‘Abstand languages’ and ‘Ausbau languages’. Anthropological Linguistics 9(7). 29–41.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2001Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lancashire, Ian
2012Early Modern English: Lexicon and semantics. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, Vol. 1 (HSK 34.1), 637–652. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika
2013Language contact and prestige. Anglia 131(4). 562–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lönnrot, Elias
1857Suomalaisia kielenoppi-sanoja. Suomi 17. 73–87.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
1992Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 3: Early Modern English 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001Shakespeare’s new words. In Sylvia Adamson, Lynette Hunter, Lynne Magnusson, Ann Thompson & Katie Wales (eds.), Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: A guide, 237–255. London: The Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
2014Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective, 103–128. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.[ p. 28 ]Google Scholar
2015Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (ed.), Can we predict linguistic change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16). Helsinki: VARIENG. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/16​/nevalainen/
2017Early Modern English. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. http://​linguistics​.oxfordre​.com. doi:  Crossref (9 May 2018).
Nevalainen, Terttu & Heli Tissari
2010Contextualizing 18th-century politeness: Social distinction and morphological levelling. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth century English: Ideology and change, 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Carla Suhr & Irma Taavitsainen
2019Corpus linguistics as digital scholarship: Big data, rich data and uncharted data. In Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), From data to evidence in English language research (Language and Computers: Studies in Digital Linguistics). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nordlund, Taru & Ritva Pallaskallio
2017Competing norms and standards: Methodological triangulation in the study of language planning in nineteenth-century Finland. In Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin & Anita Auer (eds.), Exploring future paths for historical sociolinguistics, 131–156. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norri, Juhani
2016Dictionary of medical vocabulary in English, 1375–1550: Body parts, sicknesses, instruments and medicinal preparations. London & New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja
2012Periods: Early Modern English. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 1 (HSK 34.1), 48–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
In progress. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://​www​.oed​.com/
Rapola, Martti
[1953] 1991Sivistyksen suomenkielinen nimitys. Kielikello 3. Online. http://​www​.kielikello​.fi​/index​.php​?mid​=2​&pid​=11​&aid​=953
Säily, Tanja, Eetu Mäkelä & Mika Hämäläinen
2018Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 29–48. [=this volume] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Jürgen
1980Documentation in the OED: Shakespeare and Nashe as test cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1989Early Modern English lexicography. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gabriele
2014Sir Thomas Elyot as lexicographer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online (April 2014) doi:  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2012Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2017Semantic change. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. http://​linguistics​.oxfordre​.com (9 May 2018) doi:  Crossref
Trudgill, Peter
2004Glocalisation and the Ausbau sociolinguistics of modern Europe. In Anna Duszak & Urszula Okulska (eds.), Speaking from the margin: Global English from a European perspective, 35–49. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.[ p. 29 ]Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2011“Halles Lanfranke” and its most excellent and learned expositive table. In Olga Timofeeva & Tanja Säily (eds.), Words in dictionaries and history: Essays in honour of R.W. McConchie (Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 14), 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanhan kirjasuomen sanakirja
In progress. Kotimaisten kielten keskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 38. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten keskus. URN:NBN:fi: kotus201435. http://​kaino​.kotus​.fi​/vks/
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
1968Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wermser, Richard
1976Statistische Studien zur Entwicklung des englischen Wortschatzes (Schweizer Anglistische Arbeiten 91). Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar