Cover not available
Article published In:
The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 8–29

From speaker innovation to lexical change

A sociohistorical approach to neologisms

| University of Helsinki, Finland

Applying a sociolinguistic approach to the study of neologisms, this paper discusses the actuation and diffusion of new words in Early Modern English (EModE; 1500–1700) and draws some parallels with word coining in the comparable but more recent period of Early Modern Finnish (EModF; 1810–1880). The success of this exercise ultimately depends on the data and tools available for ascertaining the status of neologisms in a broader synchronic and diachronic context. The use of historical dictionaries and digital databases shows that many words that were earlier considered particular innovations in EModE are now up for re-evaluation. Determining their actual moments of coinage and entry into the language may be beyond historical lexicology and lexicography, but the new tools make it possible to better monitor their provenance and process of diffusion over time.

Keywords: Early Modern English, Early Modern Finnish, neologism detection, speaker innovation, diffusion, codification, vernacularization, standardization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modelling the process of lexical change
  • 3.Monitoring lexical diffusion in English
    • 3.1Dictionaries
    • 3.2Databases
  • 4.Reviewing processes of lexical innovation in Early Modern English
    • 4.1Shakespeare: An innovator or an early adopter?
    • 4.2Vernacularization
      • 4.2.1Diffusion of new vocabulary
      • 4.2.2Sir Thomas Elyot as a neologizer
  • 5.Reviewing processes of lexical innovation in Early Modern Finnish
    • 5.1Developing a literary language
    • 5.2Active neologizers
  • 6.Comparing the processes of vernacularization
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18008.nev
References
Algeo, John
1998 Vocabulary. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 41, 1776–1997, 57–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles
1997 Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald & Antoinette Renouf
1996 Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 721. 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald, Fabian Tomaschek, Susanne Gahl & Michael Ramscar
2017 The ecclesiastes principle in language change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 21–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Charlotte
2007 Treasure-house of the language: The living OED. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, George
1776 The philosophy of rhetoric, vol. 11. London.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark & Don Chapman
2016 The effect of representativeness and size in historical corpora: An empirical study of changes in lexical frequency. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore & Miranda Wilcox (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language VII: Generalizing vs. particularizing methodologies in historical linguistic analysis, 131–150. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Durkin, Philip
2014 Borrowed words: A history of loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Ward E. Y. & Robert J. Valenza
2011 Shakespeare’s vocabulary: Did it dwarf all others? In Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language: Transdisciplinary approaches, 34–57. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fischer, Roswitha
1998 Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan, Justyna A. Robinson, Marc Alexander, Iona C. Hine, Seth Mehl & Fraser Dallachy
2017 Linguistic DNA: Investigating conceptual change in Early Modern English discourse. Studia Neophilologica 891:sup1. 21–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garner, Brian
1982 Shakespeare’s Latinate neologisms. Shakespeare Studies 151. 149–170.Google Scholar
Goodland, Giles
2011 ‘Strange deliveries’: Contextualising Shakespeare’s first citations in the OED . In Mireille Ravassat & Jonathan Culpeper (eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language: Transdisciplinary approaches, 8–33. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Häkkinen, Kaisa
1994 Agricolasta nykykieleen: Suomen kirjakielen historia. Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
2004–2005 Nykysuomen etymologinen sanakirja, 21 vols. Juva: WSOY.Google Scholar
2018 Suomi on kuuden kerroksen kieli. Tiede 11/2018 36–43.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Lauri
1979 Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys. 4th ed. Helsinki: Otava.Google Scholar
Huumo, Katja, Lea Laitinen & Outi Paloposki
(eds.) 2004 Yhteistä kieltä tekemässä: Näkökulmia suomen kirjakielen kehitykseen 1800-luvulla. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Iivonen, Antti, Terttu Nevalainen, Reijo Aulanko & Hannu Kaskinen
1987 Puheen intonaatio. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz
1967 ‘Abstand languages’ and ‘Ausbau languages’. Anthropological Linguistics 9(7). 29–41.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2001 Principles of linguistic change, vol. 21: Social factors. Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lancashire, Ian
2012 Early Modern English: Lexicon and semantics. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, Vol. 11 (HSK 34.1), 637–652. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lutz, Angelika
2013 Language contact and prestige. Anglia 131(4). 562–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lönnrot, Elias
1857 Suomalaisia kielenoppi-sanoja. Suomi 171. 73–87.Google Scholar
Milroy, James
1992 Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999 Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 31: Early Modern English 1476–1776, 332–458. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001 Shakespeare’s new words. In Sylvia Adamson, Lynette Hunter, Lynne Magnusson, Ann Thompson & Katie Wales (eds.), Reading Shakespeare’s dramatic language: A guide, 237–255. London: The Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
2014 Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective, 103–128. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer (ed.), Can we predict linguistic change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]
2017 Early Modern English. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. [URL]. doi:  DOI logo (9 May 2018).
Nevalainen, Terttu & Heli Tissari
2010 Contextualizing 18th-century politeness: Social distinction and morphological levelling. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth century English: Ideology and change, 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Carla Suhr & Irma Taavitsainen
2019 Corpus linguistics as digital scholarship: Big data, rich data and uncharted data. In Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), From data to evidence in English language research (Language and Computers: Studies in Digital Linguistics). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nordlund, Taru & Ritva Pallaskallio
2017 Competing norms and standards: Methodological triangulation in the study of language planning in nineteenth-century Finland. In Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin & Anita Auer (eds.), Exploring future paths for historical sociolinguistics, 131–156. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norri, Juhani
2016 Dictionary of medical vocabulary in English, 1375–1550: Body parts, sicknesses, instruments and medicinal preparations. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja
2012 Periods: Early Modern English. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 11 (HSK 34.1), 48–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
In progress. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Rapola, Martti
[1953] 1991 Sivistyksen suomenkielinen nimitys. Kielikello 31. Online. [URL]
Säily, Tanja, Eetu Mäkelä & Mika Hämäläinen
2018 Explorations into the social contexts of neologism use in early English correspondence. Pragmatics & Cognition 25(1). 29–48. [=this volume] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Jürgen
1980 Documentation in the OED: Shakespeare and Nashe as test cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1989 Early Modern English lexicography. 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Gabriele
2014 Sir Thomas Elyot as lexicographer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online (April 2014) doi:  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2012 Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2017 Semantic change. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. [URL] (9 May 2018) doi:  DOI logo
Trudgill, Peter
2004 Glocalisation and the Ausbau sociolinguistics of modern Europe. In Anna Duszak & Urszula Okulska (eds.), Speaking from the margin: Global English from a European perspective, 35–49. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka
2011 “Halles Lanfranke” and its most excellent and learned expositive table. In Olga Timofeeva & Tanja Säily (eds.), Words in dictionaries and history: Essays in honour of R.W. McConchie (Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 14), 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhan kirjasuomen sanakirja
In progress. Kotimaisten kielten keskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 38. Helsinki: Kotimaisten kielten keskus. URN:NBN:fi: kotus201435. [URL]
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wermser, Richard
1976 Statistische Studien zur Entwicklung des englischen Wortschatzes (Schweizer Anglistische Arbeiten 91). Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar