Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 24:3 (2017) ► pp.346–372

Deliberately misleading or unintentionally ambiguous?

A cognitive linguistic view on defective codes of memory

| Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin, Poland
The present paper focuses on the use of deliberately misleading or unintentionally misinformative phrases related to the so called “Polish concentration camp” issue. This problem has been gaining increasing attention in the Polish media and political sphere. In the article I present the background of the problem including the current legal situation, as well as a linguistic analysis of a selection of problematic collocations. I attempt to maintain an objective stance and refrain from passing any emotional judgement on the issue, providing, at the same time, an in-depth analysis of the linguistic data. I frame the present paper within the cognitive linguistics methodology. I combine Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner’s (2002) Conceptual Integration Theory with Kerstin Norén and Per Linell’s (2007) concept of meaning potentials in order to account for the emergent and modifiable nature of meanings of complex expressions.
Keywords: defective codes of memory, Polish concentration camps, cognitive linguistics, conceptual integration, meaning potentials
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Polish concentration camps” as defective codes of memory
  • 3.Methodology and data
  • 4.Conceptual Integration Theory
  • 5.Meaning potentials
  • 6.Analysis
  • 7.Final comments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18014.pra
References

References

Benyon, David
2012 Presence in blended spaces. Interacting with Computers 24(4). 219–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bibó, István
2015 The art of peacemaking: Political essays by István Bibó. Yale: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Andreas
1999 Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition, 60–91. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Line & Per Aage Brandt
2005 Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 31. 216–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
British National Corpus (BYU-BNC)
accessed on [URL]
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)
accessed on [URL]
Cymet, David
2010 History vs. apologetics. The Holocaust, the Third Reich, and the Catholic Church. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985 Mental Spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
1998 Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2). 133–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2003 Conceptual blending, form, and meaning. Recherches en Communication 191 (Special issue Sémiotique cognitive – Cognitive Semiotics, Ed. Pierre Fastrez). 57–86.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H.
1975 Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Bert
2001 Love’s own truths: Bonding and balancing in close relationships. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen, Inc.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
2003 Schemas and lexical blends. In Herbert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 69–95. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1991 Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research 23(2). 25–32.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy Wallburg, Lore
2009 In search of new horizons: A young girl’s journey from Nazi Germany to America. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.Google Scholar
Melnyk, Andrew
2008 My grandfather’s mill: Journey to freedom. Philadelphia: Xlibris Corporation.Google Scholar
Mierzwińska-Hajnos, Agnieszka
2017 Lexical vs. conceptual blends: How to reconcile the two? Acta Neophilologica 19(1). 55–68.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2007 What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf . Patterns of Prejudice 41(1). 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1). 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Instrumentalization of Holocaust memory and false historical analogies. In David M. Seymour & Mercedes Camino (eds.), The Holocaust in the twenty-first century: Contesting/contested memories, 57–69. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Norén, Kerstin & Per Linell
2007 Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics 17(3). 387–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nowak-Far, Artur
2015 Defective codes of memory about genocide crimes: Fundamental problems of axiological and legal assessment. In Artur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.)., Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 83–104. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.Google Scholar
Rakiewicz, Filip
2015 References to the so-called “Polish concentration camps” as an infringement of personal interests: A civil-law perspective. In Artur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 105–140. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Iain Morley & Michael Boyd
2018 Ritual, play and belief, in evolution and early human societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosiak-Zięba, Ewa
2015 On the so-called “Polish concentration camps”: A logical pragmatic perspective”. In Artur Nowak-Far & Łukasz Zamęcki (eds.), Defective codes of memory: How the memory of international crimes is distorted in public discourse, 177–190. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Poland: Warsaw.Google Scholar
Statiev, Alexander
2010 The Soviet counterinsurgency in the Western borderlands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard
2011 From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de 211. 83–110.Google Scholar
2014 Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Cognitive Semiotics 5(1/2). 179–197.Google Scholar
2015 Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics 901. 67–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark & Gilles Fauconnier
1995 Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(3). 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ukWac corpus
accessed on [URL]
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2006 An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar