Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Perspectives on Genre
Edited by Carla Vergaro
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3] 2018
► pp. 483–514

genre as struggle

Toward a cognitive-pragmatic account of an emerging genre

 | National Sun Yat-sen University
This study investigates the cognitive-pragmatic motivations for the emergence of a genre of health communication called Patient Decision Aid (PDA). It elucidates genre as struggle, i.e. how the emerging genre exemplifies various struggles on three strata: the difficulties facing patients, doctors, and health providers at practice level; the changes anticipated to take place at discourse level; and the tensions in the pragmatics-cognition-society nexus. Particularly illustrated here are five struggles that characterize changes or breakthroughs that PDAs are anticipated to make. It suggests that the five struggles roughly correspond to five principles for genre theory proposed by Berkenkotter and Huckin (1993), with some modification of the latter. It also illustrates that genre intervenes in the complexity between social issues and social cognition and that PDAs as a new genre involve restructuring, reshaping and redesigning the key discourse facets (e.g. prior discourse, participants, language, medium, the world, and purpose). Based on examples of Chinese-language PDAs officially released in Taiwan and on information from health professionals, policy makers, and PDA developers, this study contributes empirical evidence toward a better understanding of an emerging genre.
Keywords: emerging genre, genre as struggle , health communication, patient decision aid
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1PDAs as an emerging genre
    • 2.2Genre as metaphor
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Toward a cognitive-pragmatic, discourse analytical approach
  • 4. genre as struggle
    • 4.1Struggle to provide more than health information: To restructure prior discourses and medium
    • 4.2Struggle to become more patient-centered, interactive and multi-directional than before: To reconnect participants
    • 4.3Struggle to develop a form: To redesign language and medium
    • 4.4Struggle to adapt the conventions of English-language PDAs to local situations: To readapt to the world
    • 4.5Struggle to improve decision quality and decision outcome: To reset purpose
  • 5.Tensions between pragmatics, society, and cognition
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18021.tse
References (45)
References
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric, 79–101. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
. 1997. The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In Wendy Bishop & Hans A. Ostrom (eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives, 19–26. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 10(4). 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Britain, Conor. 2009. Raising reality to the mythic on the Web: The future of interactive documentary film. North Carolina: Elon University.Google Scholar
Brown, John Seely, Allan Collins & Paul Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1). 32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni & Tim Whelan. 1997. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science and Medicine 44(5). 681–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clever, Sarah L., Daniel E. Ford, Lisa V. Rubenstein, Kathryn M. Rost, Lisa S. Meredith, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Nae-Yuh Wang, Jose J. Arbelaez & Lisa A. Cooper. 2006. Primary care patients’ involvement in decision-making is associated with improvement in depression. Medical Care 44(5). 398–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Angela. 1999. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up – and there’s no going back. BMJ 319(7212). 719–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda. 2010. Earnings calls: Exploring an emerging financial reporting genre. Discourse & Communication 4(4). 343–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy J. 1997. Genre as language standard. In Wendy Bishop & Hans A. Ostrom (eds.), Genre and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives, 45–55. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/ Cook.Google Scholar
Elwyn, Glyn, Dominick L. Frosch, Richard G. Thomson, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Amy Lloyd, Paul Kinnersley, Emma Cording, Dave Tomson, Carole M. Dodd, Stephen Rollnick, Adrian G. K. Edwards & Michael J. Barry. 2012. Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine 27(10). 1361–1367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. & Linda L. Emanuel. 1992. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 2671. 2221–2226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishelov, David. 1993. Metaphors of genre: The role of analogies in genre theory. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Gifreu, Arnau. 2011. The interactive multimedia documentary as a discourse on interactive non-fiction: For a proposal of the definition and categorisation of the emerging genre. [URL] 91, [URL]. (28 March 2018).
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 31, Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Hsing-Chun (謝幸㚬). 2016 November. Sharing the experience of using SDM: Do I need statins to prevent cardiovascular disease? (決策輔助工具分享: 我需要史達汀類降血脂藥物來預防心血管疾病嗎？). [URL] (15 February 2018).
Hua, Yi-Ming (花逸茗). 2017 January. Shared decision making (醫病共享決策). [URL] (15 February 2018).
Johnstone, Barbara. 2018. Discourse analysis, 3rd edn. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2012. Genre as social process. In Bill Cope & Mary Kalanztis (eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing, 22–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Kun-Yuan (李堃源). 2017 November. Sharing the results of implementing SDM (SDM實踐運動成果分享). [URL] (25 February 2018).
Lee, Yi-Kung (李宜恭). 2017 June. How to make PDAs? (如何做出病人決策輔助工具?). [URL] (25 March 2018).
Liao, Hsun-Hsiang (廖熏香). 2016 July. Improving doctor-patient relationship: Shared decision making (醫病關係促進: 醫病共享決策). [URL] (1 March 2018).
. 2017a. The current status and an overall review of the implementation of shared decision making in Taiwan in 2017 (2017醫病共享決策國內推行現況與整體回顧). [URL] (25 March 2018).
. 2017b. Shared decision making: Concepts reviewed and fallacies clarified (醫病共享決 策: 觀念回顧與迷思釐清). [URL] (1 March 2018).
Liao, Hsun-Hsiang, Huey-Wen Liang, Hou-Chaung Chen, Ching-I. Chang, Pa-Chun Wang & Chung-Liang Shih. 2017. Shared decision making in Taiwan. The Journal of Evidence and Quality in Health Care (ZEFQ) 123/1241. 95–98.Google Scholar
Lin, Patria Y., Duncan G. Campbell, Edmund Chaney, Chuan-Fen Liu, Patrick J. Heagerty, Bradford L. Felker & Susan C. Hedrick. 2005. The influence of patient preference on depression treatment in primary care. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 30(2). 164–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malm, Ulf, Bo Ivarsson, Peter Allebeck & Ian Falloon. 2003. Integrated care in schizophrenia: A 2-year randomized controlled study of two community-based treatment programs. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107(6). 415–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(2). 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence or something else? The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2). 4–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. & Ashley R. Kelly (eds.). 2017. Emerging genres in new media environments. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Annette M., Alaa Rostom, Valerie J. Fiset, Jacqueline M. Tetroe, Vikki A. Entwistle, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, M. Barry & June E. Jones. 1999. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: A systematic review. BMJ 3191. 731–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Annette M., Carol Bennett, Dawn Stacey, Michael J. Barry, Nananda F. Col, Karen B. Eden, Vikki A. Entwistle, Valerie J. Fiset, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Sara D. Khangura, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas & David R. Rovner. 2007. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Decision Making 27(5). 554–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oravec, Jo A. 2013. Weblogs as an emerging genre in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 14(2). 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Østergaard, Svend & Peer F. Bundgaard. 2015. The emergence and nature of genres – a social-dynamic account. Cognitive Semiotics 8(2). 97–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozanne, Elissa M., Rebecca Howe, Bayan Omer & Laura J. Esserman. 2014. Development of a personalized decision aid for breast cancer risk reduction and management. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 14(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puschmann, Cornelius. 2010. The corporate blog as an emerging genre of computer-mediated communication: Features, constraints, discourse situation. Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.Google Scholar
Sepucha, Karen R., Cornelia M. Borkhoff, Joanne Lally, Carrie A. Levin, Daniel D. Matlock, Chirk Ng, Mary E. Ropka, Dawn Stacey, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Celia E. Wills & Richard Thomson. 2013. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: Key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13(Suppl 2). S12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences: Examining the interdisciplinary potential of cognitive approaches in linguistics and literary studies, 21–42. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Ming-Yu. 2011. The genre of research grant proposals: Towards a cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 43(8). 2254–2268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volk, Robert J., Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas, Dawn Stacey & Glyn Elwyn. 2013. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: Evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 13(Suppl 2). S1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Pi-Chuan (吳碧娟). 2016. Shard decision making scheme: PDA competition and promotion (【醫病共享決策計畫】輔助工具競賽及響應辦法). [URL] (12 January 2018).
Yates, Joanne & Wanda J. Orlikowski. 1992. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review 17(2). 299–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lin, Mei
2024. Incorporating Textual Analysis for Genre Measurement of Narrative Discourse in Business English. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.