Review published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 19:1 (2011) ► pp. 154158
References
Ausín, T.
2005a “Weighing and gradualism in Leibniz as instruments for the analysis of normative conflicts”. Studia Leibnitiana 37(1): 99–111.Google Scholar
2005bEntre la lógica y el derecho. Paradojas y conflictos normativos. México/Madrid: Plaza y Valdés. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M.
2001“Nihil sine ratione → Blandior ratio”. In H. Poser (ed), Nihil sine ratione. Proceedings of the VII Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Berlin: Leibniz Gesellschaft, 276–280.Google Scholar
Ranea, A. G.
1989“The a priori method and the actio concept revised. Dynamics and metaphysics in an unpublished controversy between Leibniz and Denis Papin”. Studia Leibnitiana 20(1): 42–68.Google Scholar