Article published In:
Prosody and HumorEdited by Salvatore Attardo, Manuela Maria Wagner and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
[Pragmatics & Cognition 19:2] 2011
► pp. 203–223
Edited by Salvatore Attardo, Manuela Maria Wagner and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
[Pragmatics & Cognition 19:2] 2011
► pp. 203–223
Recognizing sarcasm without language
A cross-linguistic study of English and Cantonese
The goal of the present research was to determine whether certain speaker intentions conveyed through prosody in an unfamiliar language can be accurately recognized. English and Cantonese utterances expressing sarcasm, sincerity, humorous irony, or neutrality through prosody were presented to English and Cantonese listeners unfamiliar with the other language. Listeners identified the communicative intent of utterances in both languages in a crossed design. Participants successfully identified sarcasm spoken in their native language but identified sarcasm at near-chance levels in the unfamiliar language. Both groups were relatively more successful at recognizing the other attitudes when listening to the unfamiliar language (in addition to the native language). Our data suggest that while sarcastic utterances in Cantonese and English share certain acoustic features, these cues are insufficient to recognize sarcasm between languages; rather, this ability depends on (native) language experience.
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper, Aleksandra Siemieniuk & Valerio Capraro
2020. “Wonderful! We’ve just missed the bus.” – Parental use of irony and children’s irony comprehension. PLOS ONE 15:2 ► pp. e0228538 ff. 
Bouazizi, Mondher & Tomoaki Ohtsuki
2022. Sarcasm Over Time and Across Platforms: Does the Way We Express Sarcasm Change?. IEEE Access 10 ► pp. 55958 ff.
Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna, Katarzyna Jankowiak & Paweł Chełminiak
2021. Modality matters: Testing bilingual irony comprehension in the textual, auditory, and audio-visual modality. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 219 ff.
Bromberek-Dyzman, Katarzyna, Joanna Kowalik & Anna Pękacz
2023. Task Effects in Irony Comprehension in English as a Foreign Language. Language and Speech 66:4 ► pp. 833 ff.
Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, Gerard J. Steen & Marlies A.R. Iepsma
2015. Making ads less complex, yet more creative and persuasive: the effects of conventional metaphors and irony in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising 34:3 ► pp. 515 ff.
Caffarra, Sendy, Arman Motamed Haeri, Elissa Michell & Clara D. Martin
2019. When is irony influenced by communicative constraints? ERP evidence supporting interactive models. European Journal of Neuroscience 50:10 ► pp. 3566 ff.
Deliens, Gaétane, Kyriakos Antoniou, Elise Clin, Ekaterina Ostashchenko & Mikhail Kissine
2018. Context, facial expression and prosody in irony processing. Journal of Memory and Language 99 ► pp. 35 ff.
Deliens, Gaétane, Fanny Stercq, Alison Mary, Hichem Slama, Axel Cleeremans, Philippe Peigneux, Mikhail Kissine & Peter G. Roma
2015. Impact of Acute Sleep Deprivation on Sarcasm Detection. PLOS ONE 10:11 ► pp. e0140527 ff.
Feraru, Silvia Monica, Dagmar Schuller & Bjdrn Schuller
2015. 2015 International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), ► pp. 125 ff.
Fish, Karyn, Kathrin Rothermich & Marc D. Pell
2017. The sound of (in)sincerity. Journal of Pragmatics 121 ► pp. 147 ff.
Giustolisi, Beatrice, Lara Mantovan & Francesca Panzeri
2022. The Roles of Manual and non-manual Cues in Recognizing Irony in Italian Sign Language. Metaphor and Symbol 37:4 ► pp. 323 ff.
Kreuz, Roger J. & Alexander A. Johnson
2020. The production of verbal irony. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 263 ff.
Lehmann, Claudia
2023. Chapter 9. Multimodal markers of irony in televised discourse. In Multimodal Im/politeness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 333], ► pp. 251 ff.
LEHMANN, CLAUDIA
2023. As if that wasn't enough: Englishas ifclauses as multimodal utterance constructions. English Language and Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 175 ff.
Leymann, Saskia, Tomas O. Lentz & Christian Burgers
2022. Prosodic markers of satirical imitation. HUMOR 35:4 ► pp. 509 ff.
Li, Shanpeng, Aoju Chen, Ying Chen & Ping Tang
2022. The role of auditory and visual cues in the interpretation of Mandarin ironic speech. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 3 ff.
Lin, Yi, Hongwei Ding & Yang Zhang
2020. Prosody Dominates Over Semantics in Emotion Word Processing: Evidence From Cross-Channel and Cross-Modal Stroop Effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63:3 ► pp. 896 ff.
Manuoğlu, Elif & Bengi Öner-Özkan
2022. Sarcastic and Deviant Trolling in Turkey: Associations With Dark Triad and Aggression. Social Media + Society 8:3 ► pp. 205630512211260 ff.
Mauchand, Maël, Nikos Vergis & Marc D. Pell
2020. Irony, Prosody, and Social Impressions of Affective Stance. Discourse Processes 57:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
PETERS, SARA, KATHRYN WILSON, TIMOTHY W. BOITEAU, CARLOS GELORMINI-LEZAMA & AMIT ALMOR
2016. Do you hear itnow? A native advantage for sarcasm processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19:2 ► pp. 400 ff.
Prichard, Caleb & John Rucynski
2022. L2 learners' ability to recognize ironic online comments and the effect of instruction. System 105 ► pp. 102733 ff.
Rajadesingan, Ashwin, Reza Zafarani & Huan Liu
2015. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ► pp. 97 ff.
Rivière, Elora & Maud Champagne-Lavau
2020. Which contextual and sociocultural information predict irony perception?. Discourse Processes 57:3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Rivière, Elora, Madelyne Klein & Maud Champagne-Lavau
2018. Using context and prosody in irony understanding: Variability amongst individuals. Journal of Pragmatics 138 ► pp. 165 ff.
Rothermich, Kathrin, Marc D. Pell & Ruth Filik
2015. Introducing RISC: A New Video Inventory for Testing Social Perception. PLOS ONE 10:7 ► pp. e0133902 ff.
Sayenko, Tetyana
2014. Prosodic enhancers of humorous effect in political speeches. In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6], ► pp. 81 ff.
Silva, Priscilla Souza, Haroldo Barroso, Leila Weitzel, Dilcielly Almeida Ribeiro & José Santos
2018. Impact of Sarcasm in Sentiment Analysis Methodology. In Social Network Analytics for Contemporary Business Organizations [Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics, ], ► pp. 71 ff.
Silva, Priscilla Souza, Haroldo Barroso, Leila Weitzel, Dilcielly Almeida Ribeiro & José Santos
2022. Impact of Sarcasm in Sentiment Analysis Methodology. In Research Anthology on Implementing Sentiment Analysis Across Multiple Disciplines, ► pp. 1611 ff.
Tang, Ping, Lei Liu, Shanpeng Li & Wentao Gu
2015. 2015 International Conference Oriental COCOSDA held jointly with 2015 Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation (O-COCOSDA/CASLRE), ► pp. 113 ff.
Vergis, Nikos
2023. How affect modulates conversational meanings: a review of experimental research: invited review. Cognition and Emotion ► pp. 1 ff.
Vergis, Nikos & Marc D. Pell
2020. Factors in the perception of speaker politeness: the effect of linguistic structure, imposition and prosody. Journal of Politeness Research 16:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Voyer, Daniel & Janie P. Vu
2016. Using Sarcasm to Compliment: Context, Intonation, and the Perception of Statements with a Negative Literal Meaning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45:3 ► pp. 615 ff.
Williams, Graham
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2018. Bibliography. In The Psychology of Humor, ► pp. 373 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.