The paper investigates the ‘logical space of reasons’ as a social space in which rational agents operate and persons in an important sense come to be. Building from an investigation of argumentative agents in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, I discuss both interior and exterior criteria for personhood and propose that the latter shows how argumentation, as a principal activity of the space of reasons, results in the particular kinds of persons we recognize there as rational agents. The overall analysis is indebted to Robert Brandom’s centralizing of the practice of giving and receiving reasons and the suggestive ways this can be applied to the realm of argumentation.
2017. Building and Using Common Knowledge for Developing School–Community Links. In Working Relationally in and across Practices, ► pp. 96 ff.
Tindale, Christopher
2020. Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue. Co-herencia 17:32 ► pp. 159 ff.
Tindale, Christopher W.
2013. Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:. Philosophy & Rhetoric 46:4 ► pp. 508 ff.
Tindale, Christopher W.
2017. Replicating Reasons: Arguments, Memes, and the Cognitive Environment. Philosophy & Rhetoric 50:4 ► pp. 566 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.