The purpose of this paper is to apply the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (EC-Model
hereafter; see Schmid 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018; Schmid & Mantlik 2015) of language knowledge to
genre, with the aim of showing how a unified theory of the relation between usage and linguistic knowledge and convention can shed
light on the way genre knowledge becomes entrenched in the individual and shared conventional behavior in communities. The
EC-Model is a usage-based and emergentist model of language knowledge and convention rooted in cognitive linguistics and
usage-based approaches. It sees knowledge as emerging from language usage, and explains the processes underlying the intertwining
of social practice and cognition. However, so far, no suggestion has been advanced on how to extend the model to account for
entrenchment and conventionalization at the supra-sentential level. In the area of genre studies various attempts have been made
by scholars to develop or apply theories belonging to different scientific domains to understand the nature of genre. However, so
far, there has been no research that applies a unified model in the attempt to link entrenchment of genres in individuals to their
conventionalization at the societal level. I largely focus on the long tradition of rhetorical studies of genre, one among the
different approaches that, over time, have regarded genre as their main topic of investigation. I concentrate on this tradition as
it opens up the entire field of enquiry that defines contemporary genre research. To these I add by showing how the explanations
provided so far can be cognitively clarified and unified under the EC-Model. The paper, then, argues that the EC-Model is
theoretically apt to address questions about the nature of genre, capturing in an elegant way the interplay between cognition and
social interaction in genre emergence, evolution, stabilization and variation.
(ed.)2007Rhetoric, religion and the roots of identity in British colonial America. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2009Deconstructing verbal humour with Construction Grammar. In Geert Brône & Jeroen Vandaele (eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, gains and gaps, 289–314. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou
2011Construction Grammar and conventional discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10). 2594–2609.
Austin, John L.
1975 [1962]How to do things with words. Harvard: MIT Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
(eds.)2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Bercovitch, Sacvan
1975The Puritan origin of the American self. Yale: Yale University Press.
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin
1995Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bitzer, Lloyd F.
1968The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11. 1–14.
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boggel, Sandra
2009Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English religious texts. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bremer, Francis J.
2003John Winthrop. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, Kenneth
1966Language as a symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, Kenneth
1969aA grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, Kenneth
1969bA rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bybee, Joan L.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language 82(4). 711–733.
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2016The entrenchment and conventionalization of linguistic knowledge: A neurolinguistics perspective. PhD dissertation, LMU Munich.
Clark, Herbert H.
1998Communal lexicon. In Kirsten Malmkjær & John Williams (eds.), Context in language learning and language understanding, 63–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H.
1999On the origins of conversation. Verbum 21(2). 147–161.
Cowley, Stephen J.
2017Entrenchment: A view from radical embodied cognitive science. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 409–431. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. New York: Longman.
Croft, William
2009Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stephanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Devitt, Amy
2009Re-fusing form in genre study. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the Internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dijk, Teun van
2006Introduction: Discourse, interaction and cognition. Discourse Studies 8(1). 5–7.
Djik, Teun van
2014Discourse and knowledge: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1979Speech activity and language use. Philosophia 8(4). 615–638.
Fotion, Nick
2003From speech acts to speech activity. In Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle, 34–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freadman, Anne
1994Anyone for tennis? In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric, 43–66. London: Taylor & Francis.
Freadman, Anne
2002Uptake. In Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard & Tatiana Teslenko (eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change, 39–53. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Freadman, Anne
2012The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics 33(5). 544–563.
Geeraerts, Dirk
2017Entrenchment as onomasiological salience. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 153–174. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Giltrow, Janet
2002Meta-genre. In Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard & Tatiana Teslenko (eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change, 187–205. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
2000Print and Protestantism in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall Jamieson, Kathleen
1973Generic constraints and the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 6(3). 162–170.
Harder, Peter
2010Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Thomas
2015Cognitive sociolinguistic aspects of football chants: The role of social and physical context in usage-based construction grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63(3). 273–294.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Alexander Bergs
2018A construction grammar approach to genre. CogniTextes 181 [URL] (5 November 2018).
Hopper, Paul J.
1987Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157.
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2015Complementary alternation discourse constructions in English: A preliminary study. International Journal of English Studies 15(1). 71–96.
Jost, Ethan & Morten H. Christiansen
2017Statistical learning as a domain-general mechanism of entrenchment. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 227–244. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams
2002 “Salience” as an explanatory factor in linguistic change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kohnen, Thomas
2010Religious discourse. In Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, 523–547. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, William
1966The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2000A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2001Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lassen, Inger
2016Making sense of a generic label: A study of genre (re)cognition among novice genre analysts. In Ninke Stukker, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.), Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 395–426. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1996Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72(2). 215–247.
Miller, Carolyn
1984Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(2). 151–167.
Miller, Carolyn
2015Genre change and evolution. In Natasha Artemeva & Aviva Freedman (eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions, 154–185. Edmonton, AB: Inkshed Publications.
Miller, Carolyn
2016Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence or something else?The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2). 4–19.
Miller, Carolyn
2017Where do genres come from? In Carolyn Miller & Ashley R. Kelly (eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments, 1–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, Carolyn & Dawn Shepherd
2004Blogging as social action. In Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff & Jessica Reymann (eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community and the culture of the weblogs. [URL] (7 September 2018).
2016‘Genre knowledge’ in a constructional framework: Lexis, grammar and perspective in folk tales. In Ninke Stukker, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.), Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 331–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2014The double feedback loop and the parameter theory of text genres. In Jan Engberg, Carmen Daniela Maier & Ole Togeby (eds.), Reflections upon genre: Encounters between literature, knowledge, and emerging communicative conventions, 17–43. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Østergaard, Svend & Peer F. Bundgaard
2015The emergence and nature of genres – a social-dynamic account. Cognitive Semiotics 8(2). 97–127.
Östman, Jan-Ola
2005Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 121–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Paltridge, Brian
1995Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4). 393–406.
Reid, Ronald F.
2007Puritan rhetoric and America’s civil religion: A study of three special occasion sermons. In James Andrews (ed.), Rhetoric, religion and the roots of identity in British colonial America, 65–120. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Rütten, Tanja
2011How to do things with texts: Patterns of instruction in religious discourse 1350–1700. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rütten, Tanja
2012Forms of early mass communication: The religious domain. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 295–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sbisà, Marina
1989Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: Per una teoria pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sbisà, Marina
2002Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2014Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2015A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2016Why cognitive linguistic must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2017A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2018Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. In Stefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
2015Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623.
Searle, John R.
1976A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1). 1–23.
Searle, John R.
1995The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
Steen, Gerard
2011Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences, 24–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen
(eds.)2016Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 331–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Swales, John
1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John
2004Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John
2009Worlds of genre – Metaphors of genre. In Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini & Débora Figueiredo (eds.), Genre in a changing world, 3–16. Lafayette: Parlor Press.
Tomasello, Michael
2008Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vergaro, Carla
2005“Dear Sirs…con la presente ci pregiamo di…”. Il genere business lettere in italiano e in inglese. Roma: Aracne.
Vergaro, Carla
2008On the pragmatics of concessive constructions in Italian and English business letter discourse. Multilingua 27(3). 255–283.
Vergaro, Carla
2017aCome fare le cose con i testi: A Modell of Christian Charity di John Winthrop. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 25(1). 99–116.
Vergaro, Carla
2017bLogica illocutoria e azione in A Modell of Christian Charity di John Winthrop. In Mirella Vallone (ed.), Faith in literature. Religione, cultura e identità negli Stati Uniti d’America, 19–37. Perugia: Morlacchi UP.
Wells, Susan
2014Genres as species and spaces. Philosophy and Rhetoric 47(2). 113–136.
Wenger, Etienne
1999Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zwaan, Rolf A.
1994Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(4). 920–933.
Cited by (4)
Cited by 4 other publications
Yu, Danni & Carla Vergaro
2024. Regular selves constructed through genres: A socio-cognitive approach to the study of positioning acts in Italian rectors’ inaugural speeches. Discourse & Society
Yu, Danni
2023. A Cross-Cultural Genre Analysis of Leadership Statements in Italian and American University Sustainability Reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 66:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2022. Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua 268 ► pp. 103192 ff.
Vergaro, Carla
2020. The Contribution of Metadiscourse to the Illocutionary Logic of Winthrop’sA Modell of Christian Charitiy. English Studies 101:8 ► pp. 921 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.