The purpose of this paper is to apply the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model (EC-Model
hereafter; see Schmid 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018; Schmid & Mantlik 2015) of language knowledge to
genre, with the aim of showing how a unified theory of the relation between usage and linguistic knowledge and convention can shed
light on the way genre knowledge becomes entrenched in the individual and shared conventional behavior in communities. The
EC-Model is a usage-based and emergentist model of language knowledge and convention rooted in cognitive linguistics and
usage-based approaches. It sees knowledge as emerging from language usage, and explains the processes underlying the intertwining
of social practice and cognition. However, so far, no suggestion has been advanced on how to extend the model to account for
entrenchment and conventionalization at the supra-sentential level. In the area of genre studies various attempts have been made
by scholars to develop or apply theories belonging to different scientific domains to understand the nature of genre. However, so
far, there has been no research that applies a unified model in the attempt to link entrenchment of genres in individuals to their
conventionalization at the societal level. I largely focus on the long tradition of rhetorical studies of genre, one among the
different approaches that, over time, have regarded genre as their main topic of investigation. I concentrate on this tradition as
it opens up the entire field of enquiry that defines contemporary genre research. To these I add by showing how the explanations
provided so far can be cognitively clarified and unified under the EC-Model. The paper, then, argues that the EC-Model is
theoretically apt to address questions about the nature of genre, capturing in an elegant way the interplay between cognition and
social interaction in genre emergence, evolution, stabilization and variation.
Andrews, James R. (ed.). 2007. Rhetoric, religion and the roots of identity in British colonial America. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou. 2009. Deconstructing verbal humour with Construction Grammar. In Geert Brône & Jeroen Vandaele (eds.), Cognitive Poetics: Goals, gains and gaps, 289–314. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Antonopoulou, Eleni & Kiki Nikiforidou. 2011. Construction Grammar and conventional discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43(10). 2594–2609.
Austin, John L.1975 [1962]. How to do things with words. Harvard: MIT Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. The problem of speech genre. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1975. The Puritan origin of the American self. Yale: Yale University Press.
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition, culture, power. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bitzer, Lloyd F.1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 11. 1–14.
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boggel, Sandra. 2009. Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English religious texts. Bern: Peter Lang.
Bremer, Francis J.2003. John Winthrop. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as a symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, Kenneth. 1969a. A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Burke, Kenneth. 1969b. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bybee, Joan L.2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition, Language 82(4). 711–733.
Bybee, Joan L.2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, Yu-Chun. 2016. The entrenchment and conventionalization of linguistic knowledge: A neurolinguistics perspective. PhD dissertation, LMU Munich.
Clark, Herbert H.1998. Communal lexicon. In Kirsten Malmkjær & John Williams (eds.), Context in language learning and language understanding, 63–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H.1999. On the origins of conversation. Verbum 21(2). 147–161.
Cowley, Stephen J.2017. Entrenchment: A view from radical embodied cognitive science. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 409–431. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. New York: Longman.
Croft, William. 2009. Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stephanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Devitt, Amy. 2009. Re-fusing form in genre study. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the Internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 27–47. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dijk, Teun van. 2006. Introduction: Discourse, interaction and cognition. Discourse Studies 8(1). 5–7.
Djik, Teun van. 2014. Discourse and knowledge: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fotion, Nick. 1979. Speech activity and language use. Philosophia 8(4). 615–638.
Fotion, Nick. 2003. From speech acts to speech activity. In Barry Smith (ed.), John Searle, 34–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freadman, Anne. 1994. Anyone for tennis? In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds.), Genre and the New Rhetoric, 43–66. London: Taylor & Francis.
Freadman, Anne. 2002. Uptake. In Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard & Tatiana Teslenko (eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change, 39–53. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Freadman, Anne. 2012. The traps and trappings of genre theory. Applied Linguistics 33(5). 544–563.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2017. Entrenchment as onomasiological salience. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 153–174. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Giltrow, Janet. 2002. Meta-genre. In Richard Coe, Lorelei Lingard & Tatiana Teslenko (eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change, 187–205. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Green, Ian. 2000. Print and Protestantism in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall Jamieson, Kathleen. 1973. Generic constraints and the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 6(3). 162–170.
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2015. Cognitive sociolinguistic aspects of football chants: The role of social and physical context in usage-based construction grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63(3). 273–294.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Alexander Bergs. 2018. A construction grammar approach to genre. CogniTextes 181 <[URL]> (5 November 2018).
Hopper, Paul J.1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 131. 139–157.
Iza Erviti, Aneider. 2015. Complementary alternation discourse constructions in English: A preliminary study. International Journal of English Studies 15(1). 71–96.
Jost, Ethan & Morten H. Christiansen. 2017. Statistical learning as a domain-general mechanism of entrenchment. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 227–244. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2002. “Salience” as an explanatory factor in linguistic change: Evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2010. Religious discourse. In Andreas Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, 523–547. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Langacker, Ronald W.2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Langacker, Ronald W.2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188.
Langacker, Ronald W.2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lassen, Inger. 2016. Making sense of a generic label: A study of genre (re)cognition among novice genre analysts. In Ninke Stukker, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.), Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 395–426. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Michaelis, Laura & Knud Lambrecht. 1996. Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72(2). 215–247.
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(2). 151–167.
Miller, Carolyn. 2015. Genre change and evolution. In Natasha Artemeva & Aviva Freedman (eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions, 154–185. Edmonton, AB: Inkshed Publications.
Miller, Carolyn. 2016. Genre innovation: Evolution, emergence or something else?The Journal of Media Innovations 3(2). 4–19.
Miller, Carolyn. 2017. Where do genres come from? In Carolyn Miller & Ashley R. Kelly (eds.), Emerging genres in new media environments, 1–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, Carolyn & Dawn Shepherd. 2004. Blogging as social action. In Laura Gurak, Smiljana Antonijevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff & Jessica Reymann (eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community and the culture of the weblogs. <[URL]> (7 September 2018).
Miller, Carolyn & Dawn Shepherd. 2009. Questions for genre theory from the blogosphere. In Janet Giltrow & Dieter Stein (eds.), Genres in the Internet: Issues in the theory of genre, 263–290. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2009. Constructional analysis. In Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Grammar, meaning and pragmatics, 16–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2010. Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past + now. Language and Literature 19(3). 265–284.
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2016. ‘Genre knowledge’ in a constructional framework: Lexis, grammar and perspective in folk tales. In Ninke Stukker, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.), Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 331–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Østergaard, Svend & Peer F. Bundgaard. 2014. The double feedback loop and the parameter theory of text genres. In Jan Engberg, Carmen Daniela Maier & Ole Togeby (eds.), Reflections upon genre: Encounters between literature, knowledge, and emerging communicative conventions, 17–43. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Østergaard, Svend & Peer F. Bundgaard. 2015. The emergence and nature of genres – a social-dynamic account. Cognitive Semiotics 8(2). 97–127.
Östman, Jan-Ola. 2005. Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions, 121–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Paltridge, Brian. 1995. Working with genre: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4). 393–406.
Reid, Ronald F.2007. Puritan rhetoric and America’s civil religion: A study of three special occasion sermons. In James Andrews (ed.), Rhetoric, religion and the roots of identity in British colonial America, 65–120. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Rütten, Tanja. 2011. How to do things with texts: Patterns of instruction in religious discourse 1350–1700. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rütten, Tanja. 2012. Forms of early mass communication: The religious domain. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 295–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sbisà, Marina. 1989. Linguaggio, ragione, interazione: Per una teoria pragmatica degli atti linguistici. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Sbisà, Marina. 2002. Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences. In Anita Fetzer & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction, 71–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2014. Lexico-grammatical patterns, pragmatic associations and discourse frequency. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 239–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. Why cognitive linguistic must embrace the pragmatic and social dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 543–557.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2017. A framework for understanding entrenchment and its psychological foundations. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 9–36. Boston: APA and Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2018. Ein integratives soziokognitives Modell des dynamischen Lexikons. In Stefan Engelberg, Henning Lobin, Kathryn Steyer & Sascha Wolfer (eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität, 215–231. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623.
Searle, John R.1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1). 1–23.
Searle, John R.1995. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
Steen, Gerard. 2011. Genre between the humanities and the sciences. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller & Astrid Lohöfer (eds.), Bi-directionality in the cognitive sciences, 24–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stukker, Ninke, Wilbert Spooren & Gerard Steen (eds.). 2016. Genre in language, discourse and cognition, 331–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John. 2004. Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John. 2009. Worlds of genre – Metaphors of genre. In Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini & Débora Figueiredo (eds.), Genre in a changing world, 3–16. Lafayette: Parlor Press.
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vergaro, Carla. 2005. “Dear Sirs…con la presente ci pregiamo di…”. Il genere business lettere in italiano e in inglese. Roma: Aracne.
Vergaro, Carla. 2008. On the pragmatics of concessive constructions in Italian and English business letter discourse. Multilingua 27(3). 255–283.
Vergaro, Carla. 2017a. Come fare le cose con i testi: A Modell of Christian Charity di John Winthrop. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria 25(1). 99–116.
Vergaro, Carla. 2017b. Logica illocutoria e azione in A Modell of Christian Charity di John Winthrop. In Mirella Vallone (ed.), Faith in literature. Religione, cultura e identità negli Stati Uniti d’America, 19–37. Perugia: Morlacchi UP.
Wells, Susan. 2014. Genres as species and spaces. Philosophy and Rhetoric 47(2). 113–136.
Wenger, Etienne. 1999. Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zwaan, Rolf A.1994. Effects of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20(4). 920–933.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Yu, Danni & Carla Vergaro
2024. Regular selves constructed through genres: A socio-cognitive approach to the study of positioning acts in Italian rectors’ inaugural speeches. Discourse & Society
Yu, Danni
2023. A Cross-Cultural Genre Analysis of Leadership Statements in Italian and American University Sustainability Reports. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 66:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Tseng, Ming-Yu & Grace Zhang
2022. Conceptual metonymy and emotive-affective meaning at the interface: Examples from online medical consultations. Lingua 268 ► pp. 103192 ff.
Vergaro, Carla
2020. The Contribution of Metadiscourse to the Illocutionary Logic of Winthrop’sA Modell of Christian Charitiy. English Studies 101:8 ► pp. 921 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.