Article published in:Pragmatics and its Interfaces as related to the Expression of Intention
Edited by Istvan Kecskes
[Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1] 2019
► pp. 112–134
The interplay of prior experience and actual situational context in intercultural first encounters
The study aims to investigate how prior experience of interlocutors interacts with actual situational context in intercultural interactions when the latter is represented by a well-known frame: getting acquainted with others. It attempts to demonstrate how the cultural frame of the target language is broken up and substituted with an emergent frame that is co-constructed from elements from prior experience with the target language, the first language and the actual situational experience.Getting acquainted with others is a closed social situation, a cultural frame in which interlocutors usually have to follow a behavior pattern dictated by the requirements of the socio-cultural background in a given speech community. There is a ‘skeleton’ of these ‘getting to know you’ procedures that can be considered universal but is substantiated differently in every language. In each conversation in any language, ‘flesh’ is added to the ‘skeleton’ in a dynamic and co-constructed manner. However, there is a difference between how this happens in L1 and in intercultural interactions. While in L1 the ‘flesh’ on the skeleton is predetermined to a significant extent by requirements of core common ground in the given language, in intercultural encounters this ‘flesh building’ process in the target language (in this case English) is not set but is co-constructed by the interlocutors as emergent common ground relying on their prior experience with their own L1 culture, limited experience with the target culture and the assessment of the actual situational context. In this study the co-construction process, i.e. emergent common ground will be analyzed by examining the use of formulaic language and freely generated language in several discourse segments.
Keywords: getting acquainted, actual situational context, prior context, skeleton, co-construction, common ground
Published online: 27 March 2020
[ p. 131 ]References
Arnseth, Hans Christian & Ivar Solheim
Barr, Dale J.
Barr, Dale J. & Boaz Keysar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Brennan
Colston, Herbert L. & Albert N. Katz
D’Andrade, Roy & Claudia Strauss
Enfield, Nicholas J.
Fant, Lars & Fanny Forsberg Lundell
Gil, José María
Goffman, Erving[ p. 132 ]
Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh
Kecskes, Istvan & Fenghui, Zhang
Kellerman, Kathy & Tae–Seop Lim
Koschmann, Timothy & Curtis D. LeBaron
2003 Reconsidering common ground: Examining Clark’s Contribution Theory in the OR. In Kari Kuutti, Helena Eija Karsten, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Paul Dourish & Kjeld Schmidt (eds.), Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 81–98. Dordrecht/Boston/ London: Kluwer.
Levinson, Stephen C.[ p. 133 ]
Linell, Per & Lennart Gustavsson
Liu, Ping & Xiaoye You
Maynard, Douglas W., & Zimmerman, Don H.
Vittengl, Jeffrey R. & Craig S. Holt
Wittgenstein, Ludwig[ p. 134 ]
Cited by 2 other publications
Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
Sinkeviciute, Valeria & Andrea Rodriguez
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.