Article published in:
Pragmatics and its Interfaces as related to the Expression of Intention
Edited by Istvan Kecskes
[Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1] 2019
► pp. 112134

[ p. 131 ]References

Arnseth, Hans Christian & Ivar Solheim
2002Making sense of shared knowledge. In Gary Stahl (ed.), Proceedings of CSCL 2002 on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, 102–110. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barr, Dale J.
2004Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary?, Cognitive Science 28(6). 937–962. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J. & Boaz Keysar
2005aMaking sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In Herbert L. Colston & Albert N. Katz (eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences, 21–43. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2005bMindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In Malle, Bertram F. and Sara D. Hodges (eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others, 271–283. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Charles R.
1992Uncertainty and social interaction. Communication Yearbook. 16(1). 491–502.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Brennan
1991Grounding in communication. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert L. & Albert N. Katz
(eds.) 2005Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy & Claudia Strauss
(eds.) 1992Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1997Universal and cultural-specific properties of greetings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 7(1). 63–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2008Common ground as a resource for social affiliation. In István Kecskés & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 223–254. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fant, Lars & Fanny Forsberg Lundell
2019Keeping up appearances: Impression management in native and non-native speakers of four languages. Intercultural Pragmatics. 16(1). 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1884/1980The foundations of arithmetic. Austin John Langshaw (trans.), 2nd rev. edn. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gee, James P.
1999An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gil, José María
2019A relational account of communication on the basis of slips of the tongue. Intercultural Pragmatics. 16(2). 153–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
2003On our mind: Salience context and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
1967Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
[ p. 132 ]
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2011Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In Bethan L. Davies, Michael Haugh & Andrew John Merrison (eds.), Situated politeness. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael & Donal Carbaugh
2015Self-disclosure in initial interactions amongst speakers of American and Australian English. Multilingua: Journal of Cross–Cultural and Interlanguage Communication. 34(4). 461–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas
1990The language of self–disclosure. In Howard Giles and P. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 191–207. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2019First things first: The pragmatics of “Natural Order”. Intercultural Pragmatics. 16(3). 257–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2019English as a lingua franca: The pragmatic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018How does intercultural communication differ from intracultural communication? In Andy Curtis & Roland Sussex (eds.), Intercultural communication in Asia: Education, language and values, 115–135. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Intracultural communication and intercultural communication: Are they different? International Review of Pragmatics. 7.171–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010aThe paradox of communication: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Society. 1(1). 50–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bSituation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics. 42(11). 2889–2897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics. 40(3). 385–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Situation–bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan & Fenghui, Zhang
2009Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition. 17(2). 331–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, Kathy & Tae–Seop Lim
1989Conversational acquaintance: The flexibility of routinized behaviours. In Brenda Dervin, Lawrence Grossberg, Barbara J. O’Keefe & Ellen Wartella (eds.), Rethinking communication, vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars, 172–192. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Koschmann, Timothy & Curtis D. LeBaron
2003Reconsidering common ground: Examining Clark’s Contribution Theory in the OR. In Kari Kuutti, Helena Eija Karsten, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Paul Dourish & Kjeld Schmidt (eds.), Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 81–98. Dordrecht/Boston/ London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kronenfeld, David
2008Cultural models. Intercultural Pragmatics. 5(1). 67–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003Language and mind: Let’s get the issues straight! In Dedre Gentner & Susan Goldin–Meadow (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and cognition, 25–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 133 ]
1992Activity types and language. In Paul Drew, & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1979Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 8(1). 339–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per & Lennart Gustavsson
1987Initiativ och respons: Om dialogens dynamik, dominans och koherens. SIC, 15. Universitetet i Linköping, Tema Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Liu, Ping & Xiaoye You
2019Metapragmatic comments in web-based intercultural peer evaluation. Intercultural Pragmatics. 16(1). 57–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., & Zimmerman, Don H.
1984Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly. 47(4), 301–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortaçtepe, Deniz
2012The development of conceptual socialization in international students: A language socialization perspective on conceptual fluency and social identity (Advances in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
1987Topic selection in phatic communication. Multilingua, 6(3), 247–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C.
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy. 25(5). 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
1999Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Usami, Mayumi
2002Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation: Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
1994Gengo kōdo ni okeru “politeness” no nichiei hikaku [A comparative study of polite language behaviour in Japan and the United States]. Speech Communication Education 7. 30–41.Google Scholar
Violi, Patrizia
2000Prototypicality, typicality, and context. In Liliana Albertazzi (ed.), Meaning and Cognition: A multidisciplinary approach, 103–123. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vittengl, Jeffrey R. & Craig S. Holt
2000Getting acquainted: The relationship of self–disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1). 53–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Richard
2019Meaning, reasoning, and common knowledge. Intercultural Pragmatics. 16(3). 289–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1921/1922Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Ogden Charles Kay (trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
[ p. 134 ]
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2021. The pragmatics of initial interactions: Cross-cultural and intercultural perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics 185  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Sinkeviciute, Valeria & Andrea Rodriguez
2021. “So… introductions”: Conversational openings in getting acquainted interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 179  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.