Article published in:
Pragmatics and its Interfaces as related to the Expression of Intention
Edited by Istvan Kecskes
[Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1] 2019
► pp. 85111
References

[ p. 107 ]References

Allan, Dave
1992Oxford Placement Test 1: Test pack. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides
2001Indirect speech acts. Synthese 128(1). 183–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to do things with words. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaanse, Roelien
2011The retrieval and inflection of verbs in the spontaneous speech of fluent aphasic speakers. Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(2). 163–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bohan, Jason, Alison J. S. Sanford, Sally Cochrane & Antony J. S. Sanford
2008Direct and indirect speech modulates depth of processing. Paper presented at 14th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Cambridge, UK.
Bortfeld, Heather
2003Comprehending idioms cross-linguistically. Experimental Psychology 50(3). 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capone, Alessandro
2010On the social practice of indirect reports (further advances in the theory of pragmemes). Journal of Pragmatics 42(2). 377–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charkova, Krassimira D. & Laura J. Halliday
2011Second- and foreign-language variation in tense backshifting in indirect reported speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(1). 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choj, Chzhi En
2001Sposoby peredachi chuzhoj rechi v russkom yazyke [Ways of expression of another’s speech in Russian]. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Cieślicka, Anna
2004Bilingual language users’ sensitivity to semantic analyzability of L2 idioms: Testing the effect of idiom analyzability in L2 metalinguistic tasks. In Janusz Arabski (ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, 143–164. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
2006Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research 22(2). 114–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(ed.) 1986aDirect and indirect speech (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 31). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986bReported speech: Some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eerland, Anita, Jan A. Engelen & Rolf A. Zwaan
2013The influence of direct and indirect speech on mental representations. PLoS One 8(6): e65480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gladkova, Anna
2017Communication modes, Russian. In: Young Y. Kim (eds.), The International encyclopedia of intercultural communication 1–9 Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Groefsema, Marjolein
1992Can you pass the salt? A short-circuited implicature? Lingua 87(1). 103–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 108 ]
Groenewold, Rimke, Roelien Bastiaanse, Lyndsey Nickels & Mike Huiskes
2014Perceived liveliness and speech comprehensibility in aphasia: The effects of direct speech in auditory narratives. International Journal for Language & Communication Disorders 49(4). 486–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
2017Indirect reported speech in storytelling: Its position, design, and uses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(2). 171–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karimvand, Parisa N.
2011Psycholinguistic perspectives on comprehension in second language acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2(6). 1268–1273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskés, István
2006On my mind: Thoughts about salience, context, and figurative language from a second language perspective. Second Language Research 22(2). 219–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Formulaic language in English lingua franca. In István Kecskés & Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, 191–219. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2008Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40, 385-406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskés, István
2014Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015Is the idiom principle blocked in bilingual L2 production? In Roberto Heredia & Anna Cieślicka (eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing, 28–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Indirect reporting in bilingual language production. In Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics, perspectives in pragmatics (Philosophy & Psychology 5), 9–29. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskés, István, Olga A. Obdalova, Ludmila Yu Minakova & Aleksandra V. Soboleva
2018Study of the perception of situation-bound utterances as culture-specific pragmatic units by Russian learners of English. System 76, 219–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latysheva, Svetlana V.
2008Modusnaya obuslovlennost’ aspektual’noj formy predikata v pridatochnom predlozhenii vyskazyvaniya s kosvennoj rech’yu [Modus conditionality of the aspectual form of predicates in a subclause with indirect speech]. Irkutsk: Baikal State University of Economics and Law dissertation.Google Scholar
Li, Charles
1986Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 29–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinchenko, Diana B.
2006Sposoby peredachi chuzhoj rechi v rechi mladshih shkol’nikov [Methods of transferring someone else’s speech in the speech of junior schoolchildren]. Taganrog: Taganrog State Pedagogical Institute dissertation.Google Scholar
Rost, Michael
2005L2 listening. In: Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research on second language learning and teaching, 503–527. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smemoe, Wendy B. & Rachel Hansen
2010The effects of direct and indirect speech acts on native English and ESL speakers’ perception of teacher written feedback. System 38(1). 75–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, Larry
2006Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal 90(1). 6–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 109 ]
Vandergrift, Larry & Marzieh H. Tafaghodtari
2010Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning 60(2). 470–497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, Nellie
2010Context sensibility and indirect reports. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81(1). 40–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Indirect reports and pragmatics. In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, 389–411. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2002Russian cultural scripts: The theory of cultural scripts and its applications. Ethos 30(4). 401–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Bo & Christoph Scheepers
2011Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations. Cognition 121(3). 447–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Bo, Pascal Belin & Christoph Scheepers
2012Brain ‘talks over’ boring quotes: Top-down activation of voice-selective areas while listening to monotonous direct speech quotations. NeuroImage 60(3). 1832–1842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 110 ] [ p. 111 ]