Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 26:2/3 (2019) ► pp. 414446
References
Ackermann, Edith
1995Construction and transfer of meaning through form. In Leslie P. Steffe & Jerry Gale (eds.), Constructivism in education, 341–354. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Allen, Graham
2011Intertextuality. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Jens
2003Meaning potentials and context: Some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning. In Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven & John Taylor (eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics, 29–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell & John Heritage
(eds.) 1984Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1987The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In Ulrich Neisser (ed.), Concepts and conceptual development, 101–140. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basturkman, Helen
2002Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussion and EAP. English for Specific Purposes 21(3). 233–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benwell, Bethan & Elizabeth Stokoe
2002Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies 4(4). 429–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Line
2008A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In Todd Oakley & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 109–148. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Per Aage
2005Mental space and cognitive semantics: A critical comment. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1578–1594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cazden, Courtney
1986Classroom discourse. In Merldin C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 432–463. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan
2007Frames, Idealized Cognitive Modes and Domains. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 170–187. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, Paul & Erna Yackel
1996Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist 3(4). 175–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2000Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructing meaning. Metaphor and Symbol 21(4). 245–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Seana & Todd Oakley
2001Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3–4). 175–196.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1992Contextualizing discourse: The prosody of interactive repair. In Peter Auer & Also Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language, 337–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2012How does ‘cognition’ matter to the analysis of talk-in-interaction?. Language Sciences 34(6). 746–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinsmore, John
1991Partitioned representations: A study in mental representation, language understanding and linguistic structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & John Heritage
1992Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2006Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 491–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Mental Spaces. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 351–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
2006Mental Spaces. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 303–371. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame Semantics. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 373–400. Berlin; New York: Monton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet M.
2003The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics 35(1). 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2007The Right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk. Language in Society 361. 319–341.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter
2014The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
2002Ethnomethodology’s program. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gash, Hugh
2015Knowledge construction: A paradigm shift. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2015(143). 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan
1997Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J.
1985The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40(3). 266–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2000Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10). 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C.
2006Views from a cognitive scientist: Cognitive representations underlying discourse are sometimes social. Discourse Studies 8(1). 59–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992aContextualization and understanding. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992bContextualization revisited. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language, 39–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamawand, Zeki
2016Semantics: A cognitive account of linguistic meaning. Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Hardin, Curtis D. & E. Tory Higgins
1996Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In Richard M. Sorrentino & E. Tory Higgins (eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 31, 28–84. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru
2011Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 58–81. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hata, Kazuki
2016Contrast-terminal: The sequential placement of trail-off but in extensive courses of action. Journal of Pragmatics 1011. 138–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Vivien
2015Academic discourse practices in action: Invoking discursive norms in mathematics and language lessons. Linguistics and Education 311. 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkle and ethomothodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2011Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 159–183. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies 15(5). 551–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Cognition in discourse. In Hedwig te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 184–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond
2012Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in response to polar questions. In de Ruiter Jan P. (ed.). Questions: formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Robert
2005A cognitive agnostic in conversation analysis: When do strategies affect spoken interaction? In Hedwig te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 134–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, Anders
2004‘How’re we doing’: An interactional approach to cognitive processes of online meaning construction. Unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2005Conceptual disintegration and blending in interactional sequences: A discussion of new phenomena, processes vs. products, and methodology. Journal of Pragmatics 37(10). 1653–1685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Compression in interaction. In Todd Oakley & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 179–208. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, Anders & Todd Oakley
2008Mental spaces and discourse analysis. In Todd Oakley, & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 1–26. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, G. Rasmus
2008‘Mental spaces’ and ‘blending’ in discourse and interaction: A response. In Todd Oakley & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 247–250. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1990The speech event and the functions of language. In Roman Jakobson, Linda R. Waugh and Monique Monville-Burston (eds.), On Language, 69–79. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1986Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies 9(2). 153–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufer, David S. & Kathleen Carley
1993Communication at a distance: The influence of print on sociocultural organization and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2012Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Last retrived from https://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com/. doi:  DOI logo. (9 April, 2019)
Lantolf, James P.
(ed.) 2000Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003Contextualizing ‘contextualization cues’. In Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano & Paul J. Thibault (eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, 31–39. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony J.
2007An introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
2003Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael
2003Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36(1). 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1975A framework for representing knowledge. In Patrick Henry Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miranda, Shaila M. & Carol Saunders
2003The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information System Research 14(1). 87–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Todd
2009From attention to meaning: Explorations in semiotics, linguistics, and rhetoric. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Todd & Anders Hougaard
(eds.) 2008Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Charles Kay & Ivor Armstrong Richards
1989The meaning of meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.Google Scholar
Orr, Mary
2003Intertextuality: Debates and contexts. Malden, USA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Yuling
2012Interactional Linguistics as a research perspective. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Last retrieved from https://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com/. doi:  DOI logo. (9 April, 2019.)
Parrill, Fey & Eve Sweetser
2004What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture 4(2). 197–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual, Esther
2008Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In Todd Oakley & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 79–108. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pena-Shaff, Judith B. & Craig Nicholls
2004Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computer and Education 42(3). 243–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, Teresa
1994Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning 44(3). 493–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Hedwig te Molder
2005Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey & John Heritage
2006The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35(5). 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1992Outlines of a dialogically based social-cognitive approach to human cognition and communication. In Astri Heen Wold (ed.), The dialogical alternative: Towards a theory of language and mind, 19–44. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1984On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social interaction, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1972Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75–119. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
1992In another context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 191–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Harvey Sacks
1973Opening up closings. Semiotica 8(4). 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence
1999Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 107(3–4). 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwitalla, Johannes
1992Comments on Margret Selting: Intonation as a contextualization device. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language, 259–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
1999WordSmith tools help manual, version 3.0. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
1992Intonation as a contextualization device: Case studies on the role of prosody, especially intonation, in contextualizing story telling in conversation. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language, 233–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2005Talk and practical epistemology: The social life of knowledge in a Caribbean community. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sara W. & Andreas H. Jucker
1998Interactive aspects of reference assignment in conversations. Pragmatics & Cognition 6(1–2). 153–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stahl, Gerry
2006Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig
2011Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 3–26. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2010Three concepts of keywords. In Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds.), Keyness in texts, 21–42. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve & Gilles Fauconnier
1996Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of Mental Space Theory. In Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammars, 1–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Terasaki, Alene K.
2004Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark
2001Cognitive dimensions of social science: The way we think about politics, economics, law, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans
2001Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of ‘over’. Language 77(4). 724–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Boxtel, Carla, Jos van der Linden & Gellof Kanselaar
2000Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10(4). 311–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Steve
2014Newcastle University Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert F.
2008Guided conceptualization: Mental spaces in institutional discourse. In Todd Oakley & Anders Hougaard (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 209–234. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yin, Robert K.
2014Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yin, Robert K. & Darnella Davis
2007Adding new dimensions to case study evaluations: The case of evaluating comprehensive reforms. In George Julnes & Debra J. Rog (eds.), Informing federal policies for evaluation methodology, 75–93. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Key publications of author

Pan, Yun
2017Raising trainee translators’ critical language awareness in news translation. Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 21. 160–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020Corpus linguistics approaches to trainee translators’ framing practice in news translation. The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting Research 12(1). 90–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar