Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 26:2/3 (2019) ► pp.321–356

On perception as the basis for object concepts

A critical analysis

| Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Spain
| Universidad Autónoma de Madrid , Spain
Within cognitive and developmental psychology, it is commonly argued that perception is the basis for object concepts. According to this view, sensory experiences would translate into concepts thanks to the recognition, correlation and integration of physical attributes. Once attributes are integrated into general patterns, subjects would become able to parse objects into categories. In this article, we critically review the three epistemological perspectives according to which it can be claimed that object concepts depend on perception: state non-conceptualism, content non-conceptualism, and content conceptualism. We show that the three perspectives have problems that make perception inadequate as a conceptual basis. We suggest that the inquiry about the origin and development of object concepts can benefit from a pragmatic perspective that considers objects’ cultural functions as a conceptual foundation. We address this possibility from the theoretical framework of the pragmatics of the object, considering the importance of objects’ functional permanence.
Keywords: object, concepts, categorisation, functional permanence, pragmatics of the object
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Object concepts as a by-product of perception
  • 3.The relationship between perceptions and concepts: Three options, three problem sets
    • 3.1State non-conceptualism and its problems
      • 3.1.1Perceptual constancy is not a natural phenomenon
      • 3.1.2Perceptual constancy is conceptual
      • 3.1.3The perception of qualities involves different developmental achievements
    • 3.2Content non-conceptualism and its problems
      • 3.2.1Non-conceptual perceptions cannot justify beliefs: A semantic problem
      • 3.2.2Concepts do not have contact with the real world: A problem of reference
    • 3.3Conceptualism and its problems
      • 3.3.1Demonstrative concepts are a chimaera
      • 3.3.2Explanatory circularity
      • 3.3.3Misperception, culture and re-identification
      • 3.3.4Content overlapping and animal cognition
      • 3.3.5Inflexible concepts
      • 3.3.6Individual concepts and explanatory solipsism
  • 4.Perception in its labyrinth: A pragmatic and functional way out
    • 4.1Perception is not contemplation
    • 4.2The pragmatics of the object: Cognitive development from a pragmatic, functional, and cultural perspective
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Declaration of interest statement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19027.ale
References (192)
References
Alessandroni, Nicolás. 2017. Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 51(4). 618–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Varieties of embodiment in cognitive science. Theory & Psychology 28(2). 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alessandroni, Nicolás & Cintia Rodríguez. 2017. Is CONTAINER a natural and embodied image schema? A developmental, pragmatic, and cultural proposal. Human Development 60(4). 144–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alessandroni, Nicolás, Ana Moreno-Núñez, Cintia Rodríguez & María Jesús Del Olmo. 2019. Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: A case study 841. 1555–1571. Psychological Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, George A. & Steven L. Franconeri. 2007. How many objects can you track?: Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision 7(13). 14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anglin, Jeremy M. 1977. Word, object and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Archer, James. 1966. The psychological nature of concepts. In Herbert J. Klausmeier & Chester W. Harris (eds.), Analyses of concept learning, 37–49. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. trans. 2016. De anima [On the soul]. Transl. by Christopher Shields, edited by Lindsay Judson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jeanne E., Anthony P. Graesch, Enzo Ragazzini & Elinor Ochs. 2012. Life at home in the twenty-first century. California: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. Sense and sensibilia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Babska, Zofia. 1965. The formation of the conception of identity of visual characteristics of objects seen successively. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 30(2). 112–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bambach, Sven, Linda B. Smith, David J. Crandall & Chen Yu. 2016. Objects in the center: How the infant’s body constrains infant scenes. 2016 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), Cergy-Pontoise, 132–137. France: IEEE. DOI logo
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Léo Dutriaux & Christoph Scheepers. 2018. Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373(1752). Article 20170144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W., Steven Sloman & Sergio Chaigneau. 2005. The HIPE theory of function. In Laura Carlson & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Functional features for language and space: Insights from perception, categorization, and development, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bomba, Paul C. & Einar R. Siqueland. 1983. The nature and structure of infant form categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35(2). 294–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Bill. 1999. Perception and reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Perceptual experience has conceptual content. In Matthias Steup & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology, 217–230. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S., Jacqueline J. Goodnow & George A. Austin. 1956/2009. A study of thinking. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Burns, Barbara. 1986. Perceptual development and categorization: I. An investigation of task demands, stimulus set similarity, and age. The Journal of Genetic Psychology 147(3). 359–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byers, Patrick. 2016. Knowledge claims in cognitive development research: Problems and alternatives. New Ideas in Psychology 43(1). 16–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Alex. 2005. Perception and conceptual content. In Matthias Steup & Ernest Sosa (eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology, 231–250. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Cabell, Kenneth R. & Jaan Valsiner (eds.). 2014. The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cahen, Arnon & Michela C. Tacca. 2013. Linking perception and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 41(MAR). 1–2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, Susan. 2009. The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasola, Marianella & Yeojin A. Ahn. 2018. What develops in infants’ spatial categorization? Korean infants’ categorization of containment and tight-fit relations. Child Development 89(4). e382–e396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaigneau, Sergio & Lawrence W. Barsalou. 2008. The role of function in categories. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 8(1). 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Quanjing, Frank E. Garcea & Bradford Z. Mahon. 2016. The representation of object-directed action and function knowledge in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 26(4). 1609–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiou, Rocco, Paul F. Sowman, Andrew C. Etchell & Anina N. Rich. 2013. A conceptual lemon: Theta burst stimulation to the left anterior temporal lobe untangles object representation and its canonical color. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26(5). 1066–1074. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chuard, Philippe. 2007. Indiscriminable shades and demonstrative concepts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85(2). 277–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1973. What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Timothy E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 65–110. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan. 2015. Perceptual constancy. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception, 621–639. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Leslie B. & Mark S. Strauss. 1979. Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development 50(2). 419–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Michael. 1996. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda & John Tooby. 2013. Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology 64(1). 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costall, Alan. 2012. Canonical affordances in context. Avant 3(2). 85–93.Google Scholar
Costall, Alan & Ole Dreier (eds.). 2006. Doing things with things: The design and use of everyday objects. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
D’Alfonso, Simon. 2018. McDowell and misperception. Unpublished manuscript. [URL]
Dennett, Daniel C. 1969. Content and consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Efron, Robert. 1969. What is perception? In Robert S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968. Volume IV, 137–173. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eimas, Peter D. & Paul C. Quinn. 1994. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development 65(3). 903–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. 1982. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, Joseph F. 1976. Infants’ recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development 47(3). 627–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fechner, Gustav T. 1860. Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chaz & Brian J. Scholl. 2016. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 391. e229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Roland W. 2015. Visual development: Learning not to see. Current Biology 25(24). R1166–R1168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2017. Enactivist interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galpérine, Piotr. 1966. Essai sur la formation par étapes des actions et des concepts [Essay on the formation of actions and concepts in stages]. In Alekséi N. Leóntiev, Aleksandr R. Luria & Anatoliĭ A. Smirnov (eds.), Recherches Psychologiques en U.R.S.S., 114–132. Moscou: Editions du Progrès.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter. 2007. Representing actions and functional properties in conceptual spaces. In Tom Ziemke, Jordan Zlatev & Roslyn M. Frank (eds.), Body, language and mind. Volume 1: Embodiment, 167–195. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2019. From sensations to concepts: A proposal for two learning processes. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10(1). 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelaes, Sabine & Jean-Pierre Thibaut. 2004. L’apprentissage de concepts chez l’enfant: Facteurs cognilifs, structure des catégories et théories naïves [Learning concepts in children: Cognitive factors, category structure and naive theories]. L’Année Psychologique 104(3). 597–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre. 1978. On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development 49(1). 988–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979/2015. The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press / Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Gleason, Tracy R., Kate E. Fiske & Ruth K. Chan. 2004. The verbal nature of representations of the canonical colors of objects. Cognitive Development 19(1). 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldstone, Robert L. & Andrew T. Hendrickson. 2010. Categorical perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1(1). 69–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gori, Monica. 2015. Multisensory integration and calibration in children and adults with and without sensory and motor disabilities. Multisensory Research 28(1–2). 71–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gram, Moltke S. 1983. Direct realism: A study of perception. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granrud, Carl E. 2009. Development of size constancy in children: A test of the metacognitive theory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(3). 644–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Craig W., Matthew G. Clark, Sven Hroar Klempe & Jaan Valsiner (eds.). 2015. Constraints of agency: Explorations of theory in everyday life. Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heck, Richard. G. 2000. Nonconceptual content and the ‘space of reasons’. The Philosophical Review 109(4). 483–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmholtz, Hermann von. 1867. Handbuch der physiologischen Optik [Handbook of physiological optics]. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.Google Scholar
Hering, Ewald. 1878/1964. Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horst, Jessica S., Lisa M. Oakes & Kelly L. Madole. 2005. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize. Child Development 76(3). 614–631. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1739. A treatise of human nature. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, Janellen, Sean Duffy & Susan Levine. 2002. Infants and toddlers discriminate amount: Are they measuring? Psychological Science 13(3). 244–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Hilla & Hilary Putnam. 2016. Against perceptual conceptualism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24(1). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jahoda, Gustav & Ioan M. Lewis (eds.). 2015. Acquiring culture: Cross cultural studies in child development. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1900. Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Kagan, Jerome. 1966. A developmental approach to conceptual growth. In Herbert J. Klausmeier & Chester W. Harris (eds.), Analyses of concept learning, 37–49. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keil, Frank C. 1991. The emergence of theoretical beliefs as constraints on concepts. In Susan Carey & Rochel Gelman (eds.), The epigenesis of mind, 237–256. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kelly, Sean D. 2001. Demonstrative concepts and experience. The Philosophical Review 110(3). 397–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemler Nelson, Deborah G., Rachel Russell, Nell Duke & Kate Jones. 2000. Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Development 71(5). 1271–1288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Atsushi, Yuji Wada, Jiale Yang, Yumiko Otsuka, Ippeita Dan, Tomohiro Masuda, So Kanazawa & Masami K. Yamaguchi. 2010. Infants’ recognition of objects using canonical color. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 105(3). 256–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947. Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Koopman, Sarah E., Bradford Z. Mahon & Jessica F. Cantlon. 2017. Evolutionary constraints on human object perception. Cognitive Science 41(8). 2126–2148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krnel, Dušan & Darija Skubic. 2015. Concept formation in childhood: Cross-cultural perspectives. In James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 531–537. Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lécuyer, Roger & Katia Rovira. 1999. Organisation perceptive, délai inter essais et catégorisation chez les bébés de quatre mois [Perceptive organization, inter-trial delay and categorization in four-month-old babies]. L’Année Psychologique 99(2). 209–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Annie. 2010. The story of stuff. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Leóntiev, Alekséi N. & Aleksandr R. Luria. 1972. Some notes concerning Dr. Fodor’s ‘Reflections on L.S. Vygotsky’s Thought and Language’. Cognition 1(2–3). 311–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luria, Aleksandr R. 1974. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Edited by Michael Cole. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacVean, Mary. 2014, March 21. For many people, gathering possessions is just the stuff of life. Los Angeles Times. [URL]
Maddy, Penelope. 2017. What do philosophers do? Skepticism and the practice of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, Lambros. 2013. How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Creative thinging: The feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition 22(1). 140–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Thinking as “thinging”: Psychology with things. Current Directions in Psychological Science 29(1). 3–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maloney, J. Christopher. 2017. What is it like to perceive? Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Malt, Barbara C., Silvia P. Genari, Mutsumi Imai, Eef Ameel, Noburo Saji & Asifa Majid. 2015. Where are the concepts? What words can and can’t reveal. In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), The conceptual mind, 291–326. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mandler, Jean M. 2000. Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1(1), 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a. The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004b. Two kinds of knowledge acquisition. In Joan M. Lucariello, Judith A. Hudson, Robyn Fivush & Patricia J. Bauer (eds.), The development of the mediated mind: Sociocultural context and cognitive development, 13–32. London: LEA.Google Scholar
2008a. Infant concepts revisited. Philosophical Psychology 21(2). 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b. On the birth and growth of concepts. Philosophical Psychology. 21(2), 207–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., Patricia J. Bauer & Laraine McDonough. 1991. Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology 23(2). 263–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M., Robyn Fivush & J. Steven Reznick. 1987. The development of contextual categories. Cognitive Development 2(4). 339–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M. & Laraine McDonough. 1996. Drinking and driving don’t mix: Inductive generalization in infancy. Cognition 59(3). 307–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean M. & Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas. 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 6(4). 510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Eric & Stephen Laurence (eds.). 2015. The conceptual mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martí, Eduardo. 2017. Body, culture and cognition: Avoiding reductionist temptations. Estudios de Psicología 38(1). 140–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1994/1996. Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1942/1963. The structure of behavior. Transl. by Alden L. Fisher. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
. 1945/2005. Phenomenology of perception. Transl. by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mervis, Carolyn B. & Eleanor Rosch. 1981. Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology 32(1). 89–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miceli, Gabriele, Erin Fouch, Rita Capasso, Jennifer R. Shelton, Francesco Tomaiuolo & Alfonso Caramazza. 2001. The dissociation of color from form and function knowledge. Nature Neuroscience 4(6). 662–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Christiane & Cintia Rodríguez. 2000. La création des représentations chez l’enfant au travers des processus de sémiosis [The creation of representations in children through semiosis processes]. Enfance 53(1). 287–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morvan, Pierre le. 2004. Arguments against direct realism and how to counter them. American Philosophical Quarterly 41(3). 221–234.Google Scholar
Murphy, Gregory L. 2002. The big book of concepts. Massachusetts: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Katherine. 1973. Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 19(1). 21–39.Google Scholar
. 1983. Concepts, words, and experiments: Comment on “When is a cup not a cup?” by Anderson and Prawat. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 29(4). 387–394.Google Scholar
. 1985. Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Concept” is a useful concept in developmental research. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31(2). 96–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nogueira de Carvalho, Felipe. 2016. Demonstrative thought. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nudds, Matthew. 2009. Recent work in perception: Naïve realism and its opponents. Analysis 69(2). 334–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Lisa M. 2008. Categorization skills and concepts. In Marshall M. Haith & Janette B. Benson (eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development, 249–259. Cambridge: Academic Press / Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olkkonen, Maria, Thorsten Hansen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner. 2008. Color appearance of familiar objects: Effects of object shape, texture, and illumination changes. Journal of Vision 8(5). Article 13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olkkonen, Maria, Christoph Witzel, Thorsten Hansen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner. 2010. Categorical color constancy for real surfaces. Journal of Vision 10(9). Article 16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios, Pedro & Cintia Rodríguez. 2015. The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development 24(1). 23–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios, Pedro, Cintia Rodríguez & Cecilia Méndez-Sánchez. 2018. Communicative mediation by adults in the construction of symbolic uses by infants. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 52(2). 209–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Stephen E. 1977. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology 9(4). 441–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauen, Sabina, Träuble Birgit, Stefanie Hoehl & Sabrina Bechtel. 2015. Show me the world: Object categorization and socially guided object learning in infancy. Child Development Perspectives 9(2). 111–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 2001a. Phenomenology and nonconceptual content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(3). 609–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Does perception have a nonconceptual content? The Journal of Philosophy 98(5). 239–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, Diana I., Silvia Español, Liza Skidelsky & Ricardo A. Minervino. 2010. Introducción [Introduction]. In Diana. I. Pérez, Silvia Español, Liza Skidelsky & Ricardo A. Minervino (eds.), Conceptos. Debates contemporáneos en filosofía y psicología [Concepts. Contemporary debates in philosophy and psychology], 7–25. Buenos Aires: Catálogos.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1937. La construction du réel chez l’enfant [The construction of reality in the child]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
. 1961. Les mecanismes perceptifs [Perceptual mechanisms]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Prinz, Jesse J. 2002. Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard van O. 1977. Natural kinds. In Stephen P. Schwartz (ed.), Naming, necessity, and natural kinds, 155–177. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul C. & Mark H. Johnson. 2000. Global-before-basic object categorization in connectionist networks and 2-month-old infants. Infancy 1(1). 31–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Paul C., Peter D. Eimas & Stacey L. Rosenkrantz. 1993. Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception 22(4). 463–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rakison, David H. & George E. Butterworth. 1998. Infants’ attention to object structure in early categorization. Developmental Psychology 34(6). 1310–1325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichard, Suzanne, Marion Schneider & David Rapaport. 1944. The development of concept formation in children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 14(1). 156–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rettler, Bradley & Andrew M. Bailey. 2017. Object. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. [URL]
Ribot, Théodule-Armand. 1899. The evolution of general ideas. London: Open Court Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rock, Irvin. 1997. Indirect perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia. 2006. Del ritmo al símbolo: Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia [From rhythm to symbol: Signs at the birth of intelligence]. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
. 2007. God’s eye does not look at signs: Early development and semiotics. Infancia y Aprendizaje 30(3). 343–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In Eduardo Martí & Cintia Rodríguez (eds.), After Piaget, 123–150. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia, Marisol Basilio, Karina Cárdenas, Silvia Cavalcante, Ana Moreno-Núñez, Pedro Palacios & Noemi Yuste. 2018. Object pragmatics: Culture and communication, the bases for early cognitive development. In Alberto Rosa & Jaan Valsiner (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology, 2nd ed. 223–244. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia, Julia Benassi, Luisa Estrada & Nicolás Alessandroni. 2017. Early social interactions with people and objects. In Alan Slater & Gavin Bremner (eds.), An introduction to developmental psychology, 3rd ed. 213–258. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia & Christiane Moro. 1998. Objects are made permanent also by their conventional use. Infancia y Aprendizaje 84(1). 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan [The magic number three: When children still do not speak]. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
. 2008. Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind, 89–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia & Nora Scheuer. 2015. The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children. Estudios de Psicología, 36(1), 18–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, Cintia, Pedro Palacios, Karina Cárdenas & Noemi Yuste. 2014. Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisiéme sens? In Christiane Moro and Nathalie Müller-Mirza (eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique, 99–116. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Ross, Brian H. 2000. The effects of category use on learned categories. Memory & Cognition 28(1). 51–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossmanith, Nicole & Vasudevi Reddy. 2016. Structure and openness in the development of self in infancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23(1–2). 237–257.Google Scholar
Ruff, Holly A. 1978. Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. Child Development, 49(2). 293–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1959. The problems of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Terry, Ken Longden & Linda McGuigan. 1991. SPACE-Materials. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Sakharov, Leonid. S. 1990. Methods for investigating concepts. Soviet Psychology 28(4). 35–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Säljö, Roger. 2018. Conceptual change, materiality and hybrid minds. In Tamer G. Amin & Olivia Levrini (eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change, 113–120. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916/1971. Cours de linguistique générale [Course in general linguistics]. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Eva. 2015. Modest nonconceptualism. Epistemology, phenomenology, and content. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schyns, Philippe G., Robert L. Goldstone & Jean-Pierre Thibaut. 1998. The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(1). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedivy, Sonia. 1996. Must conceptually informed perceptual experience involve non-conceptual content? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26(3). 413–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1609/2002. Complete sonnets and poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shams, Ladan, Yukiyasu Kamitani & Shinsuke Shimojo. 2000. Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature 408(6814). Article 788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shanks, David R. 2015. Concept learning and representation: Models. In James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 538–541. Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloutsky, Vladimir M. 2003. The role of similarity in the development of categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(6). 246–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Category learning and conceptual development. In Simona Ghetti & John T. Wixted (eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Volume 41, 4th ed. 37–82. New York: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda B. 2005. Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science 29(4). 665–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda B., Sandra Street, Susan S. Jones & Karin H. James. 2014. Using the axis of elongation to align shapes: Developmental changes between 18 and 24 months of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 123(1). 15–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth S. 2000. Core knowledge. American Psychologist 55(11). 1233–1243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitz, René A. 1965. The first year of life: A psychoanalytic study of normal and deviant developments of object relations. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Stavans, Maayan & Renée Baillargeon. 2018. Four-month-old infants individuate and track simple tools following functional demonstrations. Developmental Science 21(1). Article e12500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Susi, Tarja & Tom Ziemke. 2005. On the subject of objects: Four views on object perception and tool use. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 3(2). 6–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thill, Serge & Katherine E. Twomey. 2016. What’s on the inside counts: A grounded account of concept acquisition and development. Frontiers in Psychology 7(1). Article 402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomikawa, Sandra A. & David H. Dodd. 1980. Early word meanings: Perceptually or functionally based? Child Development 51(4). 1103–1109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toribio, Josefa. 2008. State versus content: The unfair trial of perceptual nonconceptualism. Erkenntnis 69(3). 351–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, Jakob J. von. 1928. Theoretische Biologie [Theoretical biology]. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gulick, Ana & Michael Tarr. 2010. Is object color memory categorical? Journal of Vision 10(7). 407–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Petra & Albert Newen. 2014. Varieties of cognitive penetration in visual perception. Consciousness and Cognition 27(1). 62–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1931/1966. Development of the higher mental functions. In Alekséi N. Leóntiev, Aleksandr R. Luria & Anatoliĭ A. Smirnov (eds.), Psychological research in the U.S.S.R., vol. 11, 11–45. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
2018. From sign to meaning and sense. In Еkaterina Zavershneva & René van der Veer (eds.), Vygotsky’s notebooks, 251–270. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Wallman, James. 2013. Stuffocation. London: Crux.Google Scholar
Wallon, Henri & Gaby Ascoli. 1950. Comment l’enfant sait classer les objets [How the child classifies objects]. Enfance 3(1). 411–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welch, Livingston. 1947. A behaviorist explanation of concept formation. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology 71(2). 201–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Teresa & Marisa Biondi. 2015. Object processing in the infant: Lessons from neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(7). 406–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wisniewski, Edward J. & Douglas L. Medin. 1994. On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science 18(2). 221–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witzel, Christoph & Karl R. Gegenfurtner. 2013. Memory color. In Ronnier Luo (ed.), Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology, 1–7. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witzel, Christoph, Maria Olkkonen & Karl R. Gegenfurtner. 2016. Memory colours affect colour appearance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39(1). Article e262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, William K. 1913. The genesis of the categories. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10(24). 645–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jiale, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Ichiro Kuriki. 2013. Investigation of color constancy in 4.5-month-old infants under a strict control of luminance contrast for individual participants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 115(1). 126–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jiale, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Isamu Motoyoshi. 2015. Pre-constancy vision in infants. Current Biology 25(24). 3209–3212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Jiale, Yumiko Otsuka, So Kanazawa, Masami K. Yamaguchi & Isamu Motoyoshi. 2011. Perception of surface glossiness by infants aged 5 to 8 months. Perception 40(12). 1491–1502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Thomas. 1807. A course of lectures on natural philosophy and the mechanical arts. London: Joseph Johnson.Google Scholar
Younger, Barbara A. 2003. Parsing objects into categories. Infants’ perception and use of correlated attributes. In David H. Rakison & Lisa M. Oakes (eds.), Early category and concept development, 77–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Younger, Barbara A. & Dru D. Fearing. 2000. A global-to-basic trend in early categorization: Evidence from a dual-category habituation task. Infancy 1(1). 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamudio, Alicia M. & José A. Castorina. 2016. La cuestión del a priori: de Kant a Piaget [The question of the a priori: from Kant to Piaget]. Schème – Revista Eletrônica de Psicologia e Epistemologia Genéticas 8(2). 4–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaporozhets, Alexander V. 2002. The development of sensations and perceptions in early and preschool childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 40(3). 22–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zentall, Thomas R., Danielle M. Andrews & Jacob P. Case. 2018. Sameness may be a natural concept that does not require learning. Psychological Science 29(7). 1185–1189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zuccotti, Paula. 2015. Everything we touch: A 24-hour inventory of our lives. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Alessandroni, Nicolás, Lambros Malafouris & Shaun Gallagher
2024. An ecological approach to conceptual thinking in material engagement. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 20:2 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Alessandroni, Nicolás
2023. The road to conventional tool use: Developmental changes in children's material engagement with artifacts in nursery school. Infancy 28:2 ► pp. 388 ff. DOI logo
Prezioso, Emanuele & Nicolás Alessandroni
2023. Enacting memories through and with things: Remembering as material engagement. Memory Studies 16:4 ► pp. 962 ff. DOI logo
Vietri, Maximiliano, Nicolás Alessandroni & María Cristina Piro
2023. Intentional Understanding Through Action Coordination in Early Triadic Interactions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 57:2 ► pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
Gubenko, Alla & Claude Houssemand
2022. Alternative Object Use in Adults and Children: Embodied Cognitive Bases of Creativity. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Aston, Alexander
2021. You can’t perform the same ritual twice: minds, materials, automobiles, and the emergence of form. World Archaeology 53:1 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.