Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 26:2/3 (2019) ► pp.167–196

The intercorporeality of closing a curtain

Sharing similar past experiences in interaction

| Tampere University , Finland
| University of Southern Denmark , Denmark
Jointly coordinated affective activities are fundamental for social relationships. This study investigates a naturally occurring interaction between two women who produced reciprocal emotional stances towards similar past experiences. Adopting a microanalytic approach, we describe how the participants re-enact their past experiences through different but aligning synchronized gestures. This embodied dialogue evolves into affective flooding, in which participants co-produce their body memories of pulling down window blinds to block out sunshine. We show how the participants live this moment intercorporeally and how multiple timescales are tied together in gesture, which is both an incarnation of body history and a novel expression of it. Thus, collaborative gesturing is a resource for experiencing together emotions re-enacted from body memories. Contributing to our understanding of the intercorporeality of human action, we provide an empirical investigation into how emotions and multiple timescales are nested in cooperative gestures. Data are in Finnish with English translations.
Keywords: intercorporeality, microanalysis, gesture, affective peak, synchronous action
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Intercorporeality and interaffectivity in interaction
  • 2.Intercorporeal and ecological approaches to gesture
  • 3.Sharing emotion and affect in interaction
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Data and setting
    • 4.2Methodological approach
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1Merging into an extended We-relationship
      • 5.1.1Affective peak experienced through co-gesturing
      • 5.1.2Celebrating the similarity of past experiences and emotional stances
      • 5.1.3Experiencing togetherness through a shared re-enactment of past experiences
    • 5.2Empathetic co-participation as a basis for emotional alliance
    • 5.3Recycling gestures with transformation enables the emergence of a similar but individual emotional stance
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 12 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19030.kat
References (126)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Alač, Morana & Edwin Hutchins. 2004. I see what you are saying: Action as cognition in fMRI brain mapping practice. Journal of Cognition and Culture 4(3). 629–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrén, Mats. 2010. Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 months. PhD thesis. Lund: Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature.Google Scholar
. 2017. Children’s Expressive Handling of Objects in a Shared World. In Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, 105–141. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andrén, Mats & Asta Cekaite. 2017. Don’t Laugh! Socialization of Laughter and Smiling in Pre-school and School Settings. In Amanda Bateman & Amelia Church (eds.), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 127–147. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes & Ivan Leudar. 2005. Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology 441. 181–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behnke, Elizabeth A. 2008. Interkinaesthetic Affectivity: A Phenomenological Approach. Continental Philosophy Review 41(2). 143–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjørndahl, Johanne S., Riccardo Fusaroli, Svend Østergaard & Kristian Tylén. 2014. Thinking together with material representations: Joint epistemic actions in creative problem solving. Cognitive Semiotics 7(1). 103–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bressem, Jana. 2014. Repetitions in gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body–language–communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction 21, 1641–1649. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana, Silvia H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller. 2018. Ways of expressing action in multimodal narrations – the semiotic complexity of character viewpoint depictions. In Anika Hübl & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages, 223–250. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cekaite, Asta. 2018. Intimate Skin-To-Skin Touch in Social Encounters: Lamination of Embodied Intertwinings. In Donald Favareau (ed.), Co-operative Engagements of Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, 37–41. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Cekaite, Asta & Kvist Holm Malva. 2017. The Comforting Touch: Tactile Intimacy and Talk in Managing Children’s Distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(2). 109–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, Nick. 1995. Merleau-Ponty, the elusive body and carnal sociology. Body & Society 1(1). 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, Elena & Jürgen Streeck. 2017. Taking the World by Hand: How (Some) Gestures Mean. In Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, 173–201. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. [1859] 1996. On the origin of species. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Gillian Beer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Jürgen Streeck. 2018. The body in interaction: Its multiple modalities and temporalities. In Arnulf Deppermann & Jürgen Streeck (eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources, 1–30. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolezal, Luna. 2015. The phenomenology of self-presentation: Describing the structures of intercorporeality with Erving Goffman. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16(2). 237–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, Robin Ian MacDonald. 2010. The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34(2). 260–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1984. Expression and the nature of emotion. In Klaus R. Scherer & Paul Ekman (eds.), Approaches to emotion, 319–344. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48(4). 384–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1(1). 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17(2). 124–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Erika L. Rosenberg. 1997. What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2008. Common ground as a resource for social affiliation. In Istvan Kecskes & Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 223–254. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Field, Tiffany M., Robert Woodson, Reena Greenberg & Debra Cohen. 1982. Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates. Science 218(4568). 179–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridlund, Alan J. 1991. Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(2). 229–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridlund, Alan J. & Bradley Duchaine. 1996. Facial expressions of emotion and the delusion of the hermetic self. In Rom Harré & W. Gerrod Parrott (eds.), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions, 259–284. London: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Froese, Tom & Thomas Fuchs. 2012. The extended body: A case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11(2). 205–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Thomas. 2017. Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity. In Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, 3–23. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Thomas & Hanne De Jaegher. 2009. Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8(4). 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in interaction. New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1961. Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
. 1963. Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1971. Relations in Public: Micro-Studies of the Public Order. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62(1–2). 29–49.Google Scholar
. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3). 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000a. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10). 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000b. Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(1–2). 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003a. Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In Charles Goodwin (ed.), Conversation and brain damage, 90–116. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003b. Pointing as situated practice. In Kita Sotaro (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet, 217–241. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2004. A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2). 151–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007a. Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18(1). 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. Environmentally Coupled Gestures. In Susan Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena Levy (eds.), Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, 195–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. Co-Operative Action. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Why Multimodality? Why Co-Operative Action? Paper presented at the 3rd Multimodality Day, Copenhagen. DOI logo
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1980. Processes of Mutual Monitoring Implicated in the Production of Description Sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4). 303–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The Embodiment of Friendship, Power and Marginalization in a Multi-Ethnic, Multi-Class Preadolescent US Girls’ Peer Group. Girlhood Studies 1(2). 72–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Asta Cekaite. 2013. Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 122–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. Oxford and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Asta Cekaite & Charles Goodwin. 2012. Emotion as stance. In Marja-Leena Sorjojen & Anssi Peräkylä (eds.), Emotion in interaction, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin. 2000. Emotion within situated activity. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, 239–257. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2011. Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge and London: The MIT press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science 2(4). 705–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutto, Daniel D. & Erik Myin. 2013. Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Analysis 74(1). 174–176Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2001. From the Transmission of Representations to the Education of Attention. In Harvey Whitehouse (ed.), The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography, 113–153. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1980. The analysis of conversations in which ‘troubles’ and ‘anxieties’ are expressed. Progress Report (British) SSRC (HR 4805/2). London: Social Science Research Council. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail & John R. E. Lee. 1992. The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. Journal of Pragmatics 5(5). 399–422. Reprinted in Paul Drew and John Heritage (Eds.) Talk at Work, 1992. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 521–548.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jourard, Sidney M. & Paul Lasakow. 1958. Some factors in self-disclosure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 56(1). 91–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katila, Julia. 2018a. Tactile Intercorporeality in a Group of Mothers and Their Children. A micro study of practices for intimacy and participation. PhD thesis. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018b. Touch Between Mother and Child as Affective Practice: Reproducing Affective Inequalities in Haptic Negotiations of Bodily Borders and the Interpersonal Space. In Tuula Juvonen & Marjo Kolehmainen (eds.), Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships, 201–217. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katila, Julia & Sanna Raudaskoski. 2020. Interaction Analysis as an Embodied and Interactive Process: Multimodal, Co-operative, and Intercorporeal Ways of Seeing Video Data as Complementary Professional Visions. Human Studies 431. 445–470 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaukomaa Timo, Anssi Peräkylä & Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2015. How Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of the Speaker’s Utterance. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(3). 319–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kinnunen, Taina & Marjo Kolehmainen. 2018. Touch and affect: Analysing the archive of touch biographies. Body & Society 25(1). 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirsh, David. 2013. Embodied Cognition and the Magical Future of Interaction Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20(1). 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, Britta Timm & Carsten Stage. 2015. Introduction: Affective methodologies. In Britta Timm Knudsen & Carsten Stage (eds.), Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect, 1–22. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Konvalinka, Ivana, Dimitris Xygalatas, Joseph Bulbulia, Uffe Schjødt, Else-Marie Jegindø, Sebastian Wallot, Guy Van Orden & Andreas Roepstorff. 2011. Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 108(20). 8514–8519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3). 441–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. On the Human “Interaction Engine”. In Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, 39–69. Oxford & New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Logren, Aija, Johanna Ruusuvuori & Jaana Laitinen. 2017. Self-reflective talk in group counselling. Discourse Studies 19(4). 422–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, Max M., Rick Dale, Ellen G. Bard & Patrick Jeuniaux. 2012. Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 36(8). 1404–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manne, Sharon, Jamie Ostroff, Christine M. Rini, Kevin Fox, Lori Goldstein & Generosa Grana. 2004. The interpersonal process model of intimacy: The role of self-disclosure and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Family Psychology 18(4). 589–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1964. Signs. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan. 2017. Introduction. In Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, xv–xlix. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Christian & Ulrich V. Wedelstaedt. 2017. Intercorporeality, Interkinesthesia, and Enaction: New Perspectives on Moving Bodies in Interaction. In Christian Meyer & Ulrich V. Wedelstaedt (eds.), Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion Intercorporeality, Interkinaesthesia, and Enaction in Sports, 1–23. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mol, Annemarie & John Law. 2004. Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: The Example of Hypoglycaemia. Body & Society 10(2–3). 43–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice. 2015. The Embodied Turn in Research on Language and Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(2). 121–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipsen, Johanne S. 2017. Creative Synergies: On How Ideas Grow in Interaction. PhD thesis. Aarhus: Aarhus University, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Semiotics.Google Scholar
Philipsen, Johanne S. & Lasse V. Jensen. 2018. How Do Signs Come To Mean? Reflections on the Goodwinian Interactional Approach to Empirical Investigations of the Human Semiotic Ecology. In Donald Favareau (ed.), Co-operative Engagements of Intertwined Semiosis: Essays in Honour of Charles Goodwin, 355–358. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Pudlinski, Christopher. 2005. Doing empathy and sympathy: Caring responses to troubles tellings on a peer support line. Discourse Studies 7(3). 267–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rennung, Miriam & Anja S. Göritz. 2016. Prosocial Consequences of Interpersonal Synchrony: A Meta-Analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 224(3). 168–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Dee & Matthew Reason. 2012. Introduction. In Dee Reynolds & Matthew Reason (eds.) Kinesthetic empathy in creative and cultural practices, 17–25. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna. 2013. Emotion, affect and conversation analysis. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis, 330–349. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Birte Asmuß, Pentti Henttonen & Niklas Ravaja. 2019. Complaining about others at work. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(1). 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna & Anssi Peräkylä. 2009. Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(4). 377–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, UK.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, volumes 1 and 21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 4(50). 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 2002. Home Position. Gesture 2(2). 133–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2009. The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers, vol. 11. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
. 1964. Collected Papers, vol. 21. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ronald & Suzanne B. K. Scollon. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit. 2012. Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking. Text & Talk 32(4). 525–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2008. Depicting by gesture. Gesture 8(3). 285–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Gesturecraft: The Manufacture of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Praxeology of gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedhina Tessendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 674–688. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2015. Embodiment in Human Communication. Annual Review of Anthropology 441. 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Self-Making Man: A Day of Action, Life, and Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Times of rest temporalities of some communicative postures. In Arnulf Deppermann & Jürgen Streeck (eds.), Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources, 325–350. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Scott Jordan. 2009. Projection and Anticipation: The Forward-Looking Nature of Embodied Communication. Discourse Processes 46(2–3). 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin & Curtis LeBaron. 2011. Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, Susan A. J. 2012. Enkinaesthesia: The Essential Sensuous Background for Co-Agency. In Zdravko Radman (ed.), Knowing without Thinking: Mind, Action, Cognition, and the Phenomenon of the Background, 167–186. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Susan. 2017. Feeling our way: Enkinaesthetic enquiry and immanent intercorporeality. In Christian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck & J. Scott Jordan (eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, 104–140. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Helen Lawrence. 2000. “I used to dance, but I don’t dance now”: The habitual past in English. Journal of English Linguistics 28(4). 324–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Information (International Social Science Council) 13(2). 65–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trevarthen, Colwyn & Kenneth J. Aitken. 2001. Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications. Journal of Child Psychiatry 42(1). 3–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tutt, Dylan & Jon Hindmarsh. 2011. Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44(3). 211–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedelstaedt, Ulrich. V. & Christian Meyer. 2017. Intercorporeality and interkinesthetic gestalts in handball. In Christian Meyer & Ulrich V. Wedelstaedt (eds.), Moving Bodies in Interaction – Interacting Bodies in Motion Intercorporeality, Interkinaesthesia, and Enaction in Sports, 57–92. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weller, Anna, Gaelle Villejoubert & Frederic Vallée-Tourangeau. 2011. Interactive insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning 17(4). 424–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Andrew D. & Sabrina Golonka. 2013. Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology 41. 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Melissa. 2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(2). 207–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1979. The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55(1). 168–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Akiyama, Yuka & Lourdes Ortega
2024.  Coming out, heteronormativity, and possibilities of intercultural learning in a Google Hangouts telecollaboration . International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 27:5 ► pp. 656 ff. DOI logo
Andries, Fien, Katharina Meissl, Clarissa de Vries, Kurt Feyaerts, Bert Oben, Paul Sambre, Myriam Vermeerbergen & Geert Brône
2023. Multimodal stance-taking in interaction—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Asta Cekaite
2023. Trajectories of love: Affective reciprocity during kissing in the everyday life of romantic couples. Journal of Pragmatics 214 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia, Sara A. Goico, Yumei Gan & Marjorie Harness Goodwin
2023. The Primacy of Affective Engagement in Simultaneously Unfolding Participation Frameworks. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 347 ff. DOI logo
Keevallik, Leelo & Emily Hofstetter
2023. Sounding for others: Vocal resources for embodied togetherness. Language & Communication 90 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Kreeta Niemi
2022. Primary schoolboys’ embodied relationships in the classroom. Research on Children and Social Interaction 6:1 DOI logo
Katila, Julia & Johanne S. Philipsen
2022. Forms of professional interkinesthesia in nurses' body work: A case study of an infant's stepping. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Niemi, Kreeta & Julia Katila
2022. Embodied and affective negotiation over spatial and epistemic group territories among school-children: (Re)producing moral orders in open learning environments. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Simon
2021. The feel of a recurrent gesture. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Philipsen, Johanne S & Julia Katila
2021. Interkinesthesia in psychotherapy: a resource for exploring body memories and learning new ways of making-a-body. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 16:4 ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.