I report an empirical study deriving from a Gestalt-Interactionist approach to metaphor. Both the type of figurative expression (metaphor or simile) and the form of the expression (A is B or B is A) were manipulated in a factorial design. Subjects were asked to evaluate a given figurative expression both with regard to complexity and interest, and in terms of the degree of imageability of the tenor and the vehicle. As hypothesized, the design factors interacted in their influence on these ratings. Specifically, both the metaphor in standardform and the simile in reversed form received relatively higher ratings in degree of interest aroused and degree of complexity, while receiving relatively lower ratings in degree of vehicle imageability.
2000. Emergence of Features in Metaphor Comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 15:3 ► pp. 117 ff.
Glicksohn, Joseph & Tal Yafe
1998. Physiognomic Perception and metaphoric Thinking in Young Children. Metaphor and Symbol 13:3 ► pp. 179 ff.
Goodblatt, Chanita
1996. Semantic Fields and Metaphor: Going beyond Theory. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.