Discussion published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 2:2 (1994) ► pp.285–306
Discussion
Look, Ma! No Frans!
This paper criticizes the pragma-dialectical conception of a fallacy, according to which a fallacy is an argumentative speech act which violates one or more of the rules of 'rational discussion'. That conception is found to be neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for committing a fallacy. It is also found wanting in several other respects.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian
2011. Argumentation Appraisal. In Giving Reasons [Argumentation Library, 20], ► pp. 165 ff. 
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2012. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 439 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
2015. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 181 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 517 ff.
Wreen, Michael
2009. Look Before You Leap. Social Epistemology 23:2 ► pp. 89 ff.
Šuster, Danilo
2012. Informal Logic and Informal Consequence. In Between Logic and Reality, ► pp. 101 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.