Article published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.387–407
A properly pragmatist pragmatics
Peircean reflections on the distinction between semantics and pragmatics
Although most contemporary philosophers of language hold that semantics and pragmatics require separate study, there is surprisingly little agreement on where exactly the line should be drawn between these two areas, and why. In this paper I suggest that this lack of clarity is at least partly caused by a certain historical obfuscation of the roots of the founding three-way distinction between syntax, semantics and pragmatics in Charles Peirce’s pragmatist philosophy of language. I then argue for recovering and revisiting these original roots, taking indexicality as a case-study of how certain questions connected with the distinction which are currently considered complex and difficult may be clarified by a ‘properly pragmatist pragmatics’. Such a view, I shall argue, upends a certain priority usually accorded to semantics over pragmatics, teaching that we do not work out what terms mean in some abstract overall sense and then work out to what use they are being put; rather, we must understand to what use terms are being put in order to understand what they mean.
Keywords: indexicality, semantics, pragmatics, pragmatism, Peirce
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.What is indexicality?
- 3.‘Pre-indexical’ analytic formal semantics: The downfall of ‘pure’ semantics
- 4.‘Post-indexical’ analytic formal semantics
- 5.Indexicality in a semeiotic context
- 6.Indexical purpose
- 7.A properly pragmatist pragmatics
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Allwood, Jens
1981 On
the distinctions between semantics and pragmatics. In Wolfgang Klein & Willem Levelt (eds.), Crossing
the boundaries in
linguistics, 177–189. Dordrecht: Springer. 
Atkin, Albert
2005 Peirce
on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce
Society 61(1), 161–188.
Bach, Kent
2004 Pragmatics
and the philosophy of language. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds). The
handbook of
pragmatics, 463–487. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1954 Indexical
expressions. Mind, New
Series, 63(251). 359–379.
Bergman, Mats
2009 Peirce’s
philosophy of communication: The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of
signs. London: Bloomsbury.
Brandom, Robert
1994 Making
it explicit. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
2008 Between
saying and doing: Towards an analytic
pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braun, David
Brown, Roger
1958 How
shall a thing be called? Psychological
Review 65(1). 14–21.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri
1989 Direct
reference, the semantics of thinking, and guise theory. In James Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes
from
Kaplan, 105–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Champagne, Marc
2015 A
less simplistic metaphysics: Peirce’s layered theory of meaning as a layered theory of
being. Sign Systems
Studies 43(4). 523–559.
2019 ______
is necessary for interpreting a proposition. Chinese Semiotic
Studies 15(1). 39–48.
Davidson, Donald
1967 Truth
and
meaning. Synthese 17(1). 304–323.
Davies, Martin & Lloyd Humberstone
1980 Two
notions of necessity. Philosophical
Studies 38(1). 1–30.
Fotion, Nick
1995 Pragmatics. In Ted Honderich (ed.), The
Oxford companion to
philosophy, 23–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gazdar, Gerald
1979 Pragmatics:
Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
Gendler-Szabó, Zoltan
2005 Semantics
versus
pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.
Goudge, Thomas
1965 Peirce’s
index. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce
Society 1(2). 52–70.
Horn, Laurence R. & Gregory Ward
(eds.) 2004 The
handbook of
pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Houser, Nathan
2020 Semiotics
and philosophy. The American Journal of
Semiotics, forthcoming.
Husserl, Edmund
1913 Logical
investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.
Kaplan, David
1989 Demonstratives:
An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of
demonstratives. In James Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes
from
Kaplan, 481–565. Oxford: OUP.
Katz, Jerrold
1977 Propositional
structure and illocutionary force: A study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech
acts. New York: Crowell.
Kempson, Ruth
1988 Grammar
and conversational principles. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics:
The Cambridge
survey, vol. 21, 139–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korta, Kepa & John Perry
Kukla, Rebecca & Mark N. Lance
2009 ‘Yo!’ and
‘lo!’: The pragmatic topography of the space of reasons. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lefebvre, Martin
2007 The
art of pointing. On Peirce, indexicality, and photographic
images. In James Elkins (ed.), Photography
theory, 220–244. New York: Routledge.
2010 De
quelques airs de famille: Remarques sur le langage et la ressemblance chez Peirce et
Wittgenstein. In Francois Latraverse (ed.), Peirce,
Wittgenstein et le
pragmatism, 1–22. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Legg, Catherine
2008 The
problem of the essential icon. American Philosophical
Quarterly 45(3). 207–232.
2014 Charles
Peirce’s limit concept of truth. Philosophy
Compass 9(3). 204–213.
Levine, Steven
2010 Rehabilitating
objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism. Canadian Journal of
Philosophy 40(4). 567–589.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett
1990 The myth of the essential
indexical. Noûs 241. 723–734.
Morris, Charles
1938 Foundations
of the theory of signs. In Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap & Charles Morris (eds.), International
encyclopedia of unified science
I, 77–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Peirce, Charles S.
1885 On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation. American Journal of Mathematics 7(2–3). 180–196.
Peirce, Charles S.
1992 Essential Peirce, vol. 1: Selected
philosophical writings (1867–1893). Eds. Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
1998 Essential Peirce, vol. 2: Selected
philosophical writings (1893–1913). Eds. Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
1931–58 Collected papers (vol.
1–8). Eds. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur Burks. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Perry, John
1979 The
problem of the essential
indexical. Noûs 131. 3–21.
1997 Indexicals
and demonstratives. In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Companion
to the philosophy of
language, 586–612. Oxford: Blackwell.
1998 Indexicals,
contexts and unarticulated constituents. In Proceedings of the 1995
CSLI-Amsterdam logic, language and computation
conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Quine, Willard V. O.
1960 Word and
object. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Recanati, Francois
2001 What
is
said. Synthese 128(1–2). 75–91.
2012 Pragmatic
enrichment. In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), Routledge
companion to the philosophy of language, 67–78. New York: Routledge.
Reichenbach, Hans
1947 Elements
of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1988 On
literacy and the myth of literal meaning. In Roger Säljö (ed.), The
written world: Studies in literate thought and
action, 13–40. Berlin: Springer.
Russell, Bertrand
1948 Human
knowledge: Its scope and its limits. London: Allen and Unwin.
Stalnaker, Robert
1970 Pragmatics. Synthese 22(1–2). 272–289.
Swindal, James
2007 Can
a discursive pragmatism guarantee objectivity? Habermas and Brandom on the correctness of
norms. Philosophy and Social
Criticism 33(1). 113–126.
Tarski, Alfred
1983 The
concept of truth in the languages of the deductive sciences. In Joseph Henry Woodger (trs.), Logic,
semantics, metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to
1938, 156–278. Hackett: Indianapolis.
Voss, Stephen & Charles Sayward
1976 Eternal
sentences. Australasian Journal of
Philosophy 54(1). 14–23.
Wettstein, Howard
1986 Has
semantics rested on a mistake? The Journal of
Philosophy 83(4). 185–209.