Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp. 387407
References

References

Allwood, Jens
1981On the distinctions between semantics and pragmatics. In Wolfgang Klein & Willem Levelt (eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics, 177–189. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, Albert
2005Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 61(1), 161–188.Google Scholar
[ p. 405 ]
Bach, Kent
2004Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds). The handbook of pragmatics, 463–487. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
1954Indexical expressions. Mind, New Series, 63(251). 359–379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Mats
2009Peirce’s philosophy of communication: The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert
1994Making it explicit. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008Between saying and doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, David
2015Indexicals. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/indexicals/ (Downloaded June 9, 2019).
Brown, Roger
1958How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review 65(1). 14–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri
1989Direct reference, the semantics of thinking, and guise theory. In James Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 105–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Champagne, Marc
2015A less simplistic metaphysics: Peirce’s layered theory of meaning as a layered theory of being. Sign Systems Studies 43(4). 523–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019______ is necessary for interpreting a proposition. Chinese Semiotic Studies 15(1). 39–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967Truth and meaning. Synthese 17(1). 304–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Martin & Lloyd Humberstone
1980Two notions of necessity. Philosophical Studies 38(1). 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotion, Nick
1995Pragmatics. In Ted Honderich (ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy, 23–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1979Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gendler-Szabó, Zoltan
2005Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goudge, Thomas
1965Peirce’s index. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 1(2). 52–70.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. & Gregory Ward
(eds.) 2004The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Houser, Nathan
2020Semiotics and philosophy. The American Journal of Semiotics, forthcoming. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
1913Logical investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives. In James Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–565. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold
1977Propositional structure and illocutionary force: A study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech acts. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth
1988Grammar and conversational principles. In Frederick Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 2, 139–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Korta, Kepa & John Perry
2015Pragmatics. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/pragmatics/ (Downloaded June 7, 2019).
[ p. 406 ]
Kukla, Rebecca & Mark N. Lance
2009‘Yo!’ and ‘lo!’: The pragmatic topography of the space of reasons. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Martin
2007The art of pointing. On Peirce, indexicality, and photographic images. In James Elkins (ed.), Photography theory, 220–244. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2010De quelques airs de famille: Remarques sur le langage et la ressemblance chez Peirce et Wittgenstein. In Francois Latraverse (ed.), Peirce, Wittgenstein et le pragmatism, 1–22. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine
2008The problem of the essential icon. American Philosophical Quarterly 45(3). 207–232.Google Scholar
2014Charles Peirce’s limit concept of truth. Philosophy Compass 9(3). 204–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Steven
2010Rehabilitating objectivity: Rorty, Brandom, and the New Pragmatism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40(4). 567–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett
1990The myth of the essential indexical. Noûs 24. 723–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Charles
1938Foundations of the theory of signs. In Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap & Charles Morris (eds.), International encyclopedia of unified science I, 77–138. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1885On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation. American Journal of Mathematics 7(2–3). 180–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1992Essential Peirce, vol. 1: Selected philosophical writings (1867–1893). Eds. Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1998Essential Peirce, vol. 2: Selected philosophical writings (1893–1913). Eds. Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1931–58Collected papers (vol. 1–8). Eds. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss & Arthur Burks. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, John
1979The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13. 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Indexicals and demonstratives. In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Companion to the philosophy of language, 586–612. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998Indexicals, contexts and unarticulated constituents. In Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Amsterdam logic, language and computation conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard V. O.
1960Word and object. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois
2001What is said. Synthese 128(1–2). 75–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Pragmatic enrichment. In Gillian Russell & Delia Graff Fara (eds.), Routledge companion to the philosophy of language, 67–78. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar
1988On literacy and the myth of literal meaning. In Roger Säljö (ed.), The written world: Studies in literate thought and action, 13–40. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
1948Human knowledge: Its scope and its limits. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1970Pragmatics. Synthese 22(1–2). 272–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 407 ]
Swindal, James
2007Can a discursive pragmatism guarantee objectivity? Habermas and Brandom on the correctness of norms. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33(1). 113–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, Alfred
1983The concept of truth in the languages of the deductive sciences. In Joseph Henry Woodger (trs.), Logic, semantics, metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, 156–278. Hackett: Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Voss, Stephen & Charles Sayward
1976Eternal sentences. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54(1). 14–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, Howard
1986Has semantics rested on a mistake? The Journal of Philosophy 83(4). 185–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar