Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.457–473

An experimental study of the detection of clicks in English

 | University of St. ThomasMinnesota
 | University of St. ThomasMinnesota
This experimental study sets out to determine whether people detect click sounds in American English. Recent research has documented the use of non-phonemic clicks in a variety of languages to fulfill a range of functions such as sequence management or signaling searches and different types of attitudinal stance. While these clicks are acoustically salient and have been reported to occur with a frequency of up to 14 per minute in British English, they have not been widely investigated until relatively recently. For this experiment, we designed video stimuli consisting of A and B pairs of approximately 10 seconds of speech, one with a click and the other with the click edited out. We gave 118 participants a questionnaire and asked if they could detect a difference between the pairs of videos. The results indicate that the majority of participants, between 79% and 86%, do not detect click sounds.
Keywords: clicks, detection, experimental study, paralinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Video stimuli
    • 3.3Preliminary experiments
      • 3.3.1Edit detection
      • 3.3.2Pilot
    • 3.4Instrument and procedure
    • 3.5Data coding and analysis
    • 3.6Research hypotheses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative
    • 4.2Qualitative
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 6 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20009.vig
References (47)
References
Arlington, Jody, Sebastian Brenninkmeyer, Danielle Arn, Rita Grundhauser & Daniel O’Connell. 1992. A usual extreme case: Pause reports of informal spontaneous dialogue. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30(2). 161–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer, Maria Fagnano & Michael Tanenhaus. 2003. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1). 25–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benor, Sarah. 2004. Second style acquisition: The linguistic socialization of newly orthodox Jews. Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar
Block, Ned. 2007. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 301. 481–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Susan & Maurice Williams. 1995. The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 341. 383–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Jean Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous dialog. Cognition 841. 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christentfeld, Nicholas. 1995. Does it hurt to say um? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19(3). 171–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duez, Danielle. 1985. Perceptions of silent pauses in continuous speech. Language and Speech 28(4). 377–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Thomas Bever. 1965. The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 41. 414–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean. 2001. Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory and Cognition 29(2). 320–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Interpreting pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes 34(1). 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, Erica, Peter French & Philip Harrison. 2013. Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43(3). 339–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González Temer, Verónica. 2014. Clicks in Chilean Spanish conversation. In Theodora Lee (ed.), Proceedings of the first postgraduate and academic researchers in linguistics at York, 74–99. York: University of York.Google Scholar
Hieke, Adolf, Sabine Kowal & Daniel O’Connell. 1983. The trouble with “articulatory” pauses. Language and Speech 26(3). 203–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jokinen, Kristiina. 2010. Hesitation and uncertainty as feedback. DiSS-LPSS 5th workshop on disfluency in spontaneous speech and 2nd international symposium on linguistic patterns in spontaneous speech, 103–106. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Kayser, Christoph, Christopher Petkov, Michael Lippert & Nikos Logothetis. 2005. Current Biology 15(21). 1943–1947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts. 2005. How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech. Language and Speech 481. 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2020. Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 90–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James & Winifred Strange. 1968. The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception & Psychophysics 3(6). 427–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, Sven & Jamie Clark. 2002. Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection. Journal of Memory and Language 47(3). 343–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattys, Sven, Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce, James Melhorn & Sharron E. Whitecross. 2005. Detecting silent pauses in speech: A new tool for measuring on-line lexical and semantic processing. Psychological Science 16(12). 958–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGuire, Grant. 2010. A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research (Unpublished manuscript). Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Moreno, Julia. 2019. [!] What’s the name of it? [!]: Phonetic clicks in word search strategies in Glasgow. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 1823–1827. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43(3). 299–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 66–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paschen, Ludger. 2019. On clicks in Russian everyday communication. In Nicole Richter & Nadine Thielemann (eds.), Urban voices: The sociolinguistics, grammar and pragmatics of spoken Russian, 237–257. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pillion, Betsy. 2019. Acoustic properties of para-phonemic sounds: Clicks in American English. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 2660–2664. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil. 2018. Clicks as discourse markers in Peninsular Spanish. Spanish in Context 15(3). 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics 29(1). 83–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics 1591. 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2012. Affectivity in interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reber, Arthur & John Anderson. 1970. The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages. Perception and Pyschophysics 8(2). 81–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherer, Klaus, Harvey London & Jared Wolf. 1973. The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality 7(1). 31–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleef, Erik. 2019. The evaluation of unfilled pauses: Limits of the prestige, solidarity and dynamism dimensions. Lingua 2281. 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Walter & Richard Shiffrin. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84(1). 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen. 2014. Laughing, breathing, clicking – The prosody of nonverbal vocalisations. In Proceedings of the conference on speech prosody (SP7), 598–602. Dublin, IE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. On clicks in German. In Adrian Leemann, María-José Kolly, Stephan Schmid & Volker Dellwo (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Studies from German-speaking Europe, 21–33. Frankfurt/Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen & Zofia Malisz. 2016. Inter-speech clicks in an Interspeech keynote. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 1397–1401. San Francisco, CA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ward, Nigel. 2006. Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Pragmatics & Cognition 14(1). 129–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko. 2003. The constituent complexity and types of fillers in Japanese. In Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquin Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 2473–2476. Adelaide: Causal Productions.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko, Keikichi Hirose, Yasuharu Den & Nobuaki Minematsu. 2008. Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners. Speech Communication 50(2). 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Melissa. 2005. Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation. York: University of York dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2007. Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. In Jürgen Trouvain & William Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 1069–1072. Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
. 2011a. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(2). 207–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. The phonetics–interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics 43(4). 1080–1099. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiaoming, Jiang & Marc D. Pell. 2017. The sound of confidence and doubt. Speech Communication 881. 106–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Momtaz, Sara & Gavin M. Bidelman
2024. Effects of Stimulus Rate and Periodicity on Auditory Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Sounds. eneuro 11:3 ► pp. ENEURO.0027-23.2024 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.