Literacy and the languages of rationality
Literacy, specifically the use of writing for rational purposes, adds a new dimension to the traditional problem of the relation between language, thought and rationality. Central to rational thought are the logical relations expressed by such terms as “is”, “or”, “and” and “not”. Whereas some see these concepts as fundamental and innate, it is here argued that such terms exhibit a diverse range of uses in speech and thought but through literacy and education they become explicit objects of thought and formalized or ‘normed’ into logical operators as part of a literate rationality. This more formal orientation to language is seen as metarepresentational and may be shown to have both an historical and a developmental trajectory.
References (51)
Adams, M.J
1990 Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bialystok E. and Craik F.I.M
2009 “
Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind”.
Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 19–23.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D
1986 Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings.
Language 621: 384–414.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, D
2009 “
Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing”. In
D.R. Olson and
N. Torrance (eds),
Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 75–91.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Braine, M.D. and Rumain, B
1981 “
Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies”.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 311: 46–70.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandom, R
2000 Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caines, M
2009,
May 15. “Arrange one’s face: Review of H. Mantel’s ‘Wolf Hall’”.
Times Literary Supplement. Retrieved from
[URL].
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chartier, R
1995 Forms and Meanings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, A
2008 Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S. and Khlentzos, D
2010 “
The logic instinct”.
Mind and Language 251: 30–65.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donaldson, M
1978 Children’s Minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferreiro, E. and Teborsky, A
1982 Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleming, J.D
2007 “
Making sense of science and the literal: Modern semantics and early modern hermeneutics”. In
K. Killeen and
P.J. Forshaw (eds),
The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, 45–60.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, J
1975 The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, W.G
1976 The Language of Disjunction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. OISE/University of Toronto.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
French, L. and Nelson, K
1985 Young Children’s Understanding of Relational Terms. New York: Springer Verlag.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gadamar, H.-G
1975 Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gaskell, Mrs
1948 Mary Barton. London: Dent.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goody, J. and Watt, I
1963 “
The consequences of literacy”.
Comparative Studies in Society and History 5(3): 304–345.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H.P
1989 Studies in the Ways with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hallidy, M.A.K
1985 Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, R
2009 Rationality and the Literate Mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halverson, J
1991 “
Olson on literacy”.
Language in Society 201: 619–640.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilton, D.J
1995 “
The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment”.
Psychological Bulletin 1181: 48–271.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, N.P
2006 “
The challenges of segmenting spoken language”. In
J. Gippert,
N.P. Himmelmann, and
V. Mosel (eds)
Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 253–274.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A
1996 “
On the reality of cognitive illusions”.
Psychological Review 103(3): 582–591.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leezenberg, M
2001 Contexts of Metaphor. New York: Elsevier.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S.C
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levy-Bruhl, L
1926 How Natives Think. London: George Allen & Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locke, J
1961 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dent. (Original work published 1690)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Petersen, O.P
1988 “
Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children”.
Reading Research Quarterly 231: 263–284.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luria, A
1976 Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macnamara, J
1986 A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLuhan, M
1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noveck, I.A
2001 “
When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures”.
Cognition 781: 165–188.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D.R
1977 “
From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”.
Harvard Educational Review 47(3): 257–281.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D.R
1994 The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D.R
2012 “
Narrative, cognition and rationality”. In
J.P. Gee and
M. Handford (eds.),
The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 604–615.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D.R. and Astington, J.W
(
2013) “
Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth”.
First Language 331: 617–627.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D.R. and Oatley, K
2014 “
Literacy and thought: The quotation theory of writing”.
Written Communication 311: 4–26.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J
2003 “
Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface”.
Cognition 86(3): 253–282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piaget, J
1962 The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, J
2007 Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snow, C. and Uccelli, P
2009 “
The challenge of academic language”. In
D.R. Olson and
N. Torrance (eds),
The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 112–133.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sprat, T
1966 In
J.I. Cope and
H.W. Jones (eds),
History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. St. Louis: Washington University Press. (Original work published in 1667).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanovich, K
1999 Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanovich, K.E
2009 What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, L
1962 Philosophical Investigations. Translated by
G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yuill, N
2009 “
The relation between ambiguity understanding and metalinguistic discussion of joking riddles in good and poor comprehenders: Potential for intervention and possible processes of change”.
First Language 291: 65–79.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Koller, Aaron
2024.
The Evolving Definition of “Word” in Early Northwest Semitic Writing: From דברים to תיבות.
Journal of Near Eastern Studies 83:1
► pp. 123 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Olson, David R.
2022.
Two cheers for literacy: Walter Ong, President Trump and the literate mind.
Explorations in Media Ecology
21:1
► pp. 37 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hambye, Philippe
2017.
Langues et discours comme objets sociologiques : une illustration en sociologie de l’éducation.
Langage et société N° 160-161:2
► pp. 59 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.