Article published in:
Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 484–504

Archaic lists, writing and mind

| New York University
Theories of writing and mind have proposed that the uses of literacy give rise to a distinct repertoire of cognitive skills, attitudes, and concepts. This paper reconsiders the earliest lexical lists of the Ancient Near East as one type of evidence on writing and mind. Past and present conceptions of the lists are briefly reviewed. Early views cast the lists as reflecting a Sumerian mentality or a uniquely literate mode of thought, while recent accounts suggest they may simply be routine scribal exercises. A view from the philosophy of science, on which lists are considered a sub-type of ordering system, suggests a way of aligning a scribal practice account with aspects of earlier views by articulating the nature of list entries and the intentions of the list makers. On this account, the Ancient Near Eastern lists can be seen both as uniquely literate and as uniquely informative on the role of writing in mind.
Keywords: writing, writing and science, cuneiform writing, lexical lists, literacy
Published online: 24 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.3.04wat
References

References

Algaze, G.
2008 Ancient Mesopotamia at the Dawn of Civilization: The Evolution of an Urban Landscape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Amiet, P.
1972 “Glyptique Susienne”. Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Iran, 43. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Charpin, D.
2010 Reading and Writing in Babylon. Trans. J.M. Todd. London and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Civil, M.
1995 “Ancient Mesopotamian lexicography”. In J. Sasson (ed), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 2305–2314.Google Scholar
2004 “The Series DIRI = (w)atru”. Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon 15. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
2005 “Texts from the Series Urra=hubullu ”. Nos. 55-60. In I. Sparr and W.G. Lambert (eds), Cuneiform Texts in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vol. II, Literary and Scholastic Texts of the First Millennium B.C. Part IV, The Scholastic Tradition. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 230–3.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.S.
1996 “Sumerian and Akkadian”. In P.T. Daniels and W. Bright (eds), The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 37–57.Google Scholar
2004 “Babylonian beginnings: The origin of the cuneiform writing system in comparative perspective”. In S.D. Houston (ed), The First Writing: Script Invention as Theory and Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71–99.Google Scholar
Crüsemann, N., van Ess, M., Hilgert, M. and Salje, B.
2013 Frühe Grossarchitektur der Stadt Uruk. Berlin: M. I. Verlag.Google Scholar
Delnero, P.
2012 Memorization and the Transmission of Sumerian Literary Compositions. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 71(2): 189–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englund, R.K.
1998 “Texts from the Late Uruk Period”. In J. Bauer, R.K. Englund, and M. Krebernik (eds), Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und frühdynastiche Zeit. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 160/1. Freiberg: Universitätsverlag; Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 15–233.Google Scholar
2004 “Proto-cuneiform account books and journals”. In M. Hudson and C. Wunsch (eds), Creating Economic Order: Record Keeping, Standardization, and the Development of Accounting in the Ancient Near East. Bethesda: CDL Press, 23–46.Google Scholar
2011 “Accounting in Proto-Cuneiform”. In K. Radner and E. Robson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 32–50.Google Scholar
Englund, R.K. and H.J. Nissen
1993 Die Lexicalischen Listen der Archaischen Texte aus Uruk. (ATU, Archaische Texte aus Uruk, Vol. 3.) Berlin: Verlag.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A.
1936 Archaische Texte aus Uruk. (ATU, Archaische Texte aus Uruk, Vol. 1.) Berlin: Verlag.Google Scholar
Frahm, E.
2004 “Royal Hermeneutics: Observations on the Commentaries from Ashurbanipal’s Libraries at Nineveh”. Iraq 66 (Nineveh: Papers of the 49th Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Part One): 45–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glassner, J-J.
2003 The Invention of Cuneiform. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. (Originally published as Ecrire á Sumer: L’invention du cunéiforme, 2000, Editions du Seuil.)Google Scholar
Goody, J.
1977 The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987 The Interface between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. and Watt, I.
1968 “The consequences of literacy”. In J. Goody (ed) Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–68. Originally published in Contemporary Studies in Society and History 5 (1963): 304–345.Google Scholar
Green, M.W., Nissen, H.J., with Damerow, P. and Englund, R.K.
1987 Zeichenliste der Archaische Texte aus Uruk. Archaische Texte aus Uruk. Vol. 2. Berlin: Verlag.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975 “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic: 41–58.Google Scholar
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halverson, J.
1992 “Goody and the implosion of the literacy thesis”. Man 27: 301–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, E.A.
1976 Origins of Western Literacy. Toronto: OISE Press.Google Scholar
1982 The Literate Revolution in Greece and its Cultural Consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von
1836/1999 On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species. Translated by P. Heath, edited by M. Losonsky. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houston, S.D.
(ed) 2004 The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B.
1926 “Die Eigenbegrifflichkeit der Babylonischen Welt”. Islamica 2, 355–372. Translation, T. Jacobsen (from B. Foster and H. von Siebenthal), 1976. The Conceptual Autonomy of the Babylonian World. Monographs on the Ancient Near East (MANE) Volume 1, Fascicle 4. Malibu: UndenaGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. and Bock, W.J.
2002 “Classifications and ordering systems”. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40: 169–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E. and Laurence, S.
(eds) 2007 Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P.
1996 “Mesopotamian cuneiform: Origin”. In P.T. Daniels and W. Bright (eds), The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 33–36.Google Scholar
2011 “Literacy, schooling, and the transmission of knowledge in early Mesopotamian culture”. In W.S. van Egmond and W.H. van Soldt (eds), Theory and Practice of Knowledge Transfer: Studies in School Education in the Ancient Near East and Beyond. Leiden: Nederlands Institute voor het Nabije Oosten, 39–58.Google Scholar
2013 “The Mesopotamian king lists: History in the making. Paper presented at the workshop “Ancient and modern perspectives on historiography in Mesopotamia.” Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University, April.
Nissen, H.J.
1986 “The Archaic Texts from Uruk”. World Archaeology 17(3): 317–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H.J., Damerow, P., and Englund R.K.
1993 Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East. Translated by P. Larsen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D.R.
1977 “From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”. Harvard Educational Review 47 (3): 257–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994 The World on Paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing”. Cognition 60: 83–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “What writing is”. Pragmatics and Cognition 9: 239–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Knowledge and its artifacts”. In K. Chemla (ed), History of Science, History of Text. Boston: Springer, 231- 45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, A.L.
1978 “Man and nature in Mesopotamian civilization”. In C.C. Gillispie (ed), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 15, Supplement 1 (Topical Essays, R. Adams and L. Zeiszner). New York: Scribner, 634–659.Google Scholar
Pearce, L.E.
1995 “The scribes and scholars of ancient Mesopotamia”. In J. Sasson (ed), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 2265–2278.Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S.
1873/1991 “On the nature of signs”. In J. Hoopes (ed), Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 141–143.Google Scholar
Postgate, J.N.
1992 Early Mesopotamia: Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potts, D.
1997 Mesopotamian Civilization: The Material Foundations. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Rubio, G.
2006 “Writing in another tongue: Alloglottography in the Ancient Near East”. In S. Sanders (ed), Margins of Writing: Origins of Cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 33–70.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D.
1992 Before Writing. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, S. and Cole, M.
(1981) The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stenning, K.
2002 Seeing Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.
2011 “Tablets as artefacts, scribes as artisans”. In K. Radner and E. Robson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 5–31.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G.
2004 “Writing systems: A case study in cultural evolution”. In S. Houston (ed), The First Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 39–68.Google Scholar
Vansina, J.
1965 Oral Tradition: A Study in Historical Methodology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
1985 Oral Tradition as History. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Van De Meiroop, M.
2004 A History of the Ancient Near East. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Egmond, W.S. and van Soldt, W.H.
(eds) 2012 Theory and Practice of Knowledge Transfer: Studies in School Education in the Ancient Near East and Beyond. Nederlands Institute voor het Nabije Oosten: Leiden.Google Scholar
Veldhuis, N.
1997 Elementary Education at Nippur: The Lists of Trees and Wooden Objects. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
2004 Religion, Literature, and Scholarship: The Sumerian Composition Nanše and the Birds, with a Catalogue of Sumerian Bird Names. Cuneiform Monographs 22. Leiden: Brill/Styx.Google Scholar
2006 “How did they learn cuneiform? Tribute / Word List C as an elementary exercise”. In P. Michalowski and N. Veldhuis (eds), Approaches to Sumerian Literature: Studies in Honor of Stip (H.L.J. Vanstiphout). (Cuneiform Monographs Vol. 35). Boston, Leiden: Brill, 181–200.Google Scholar
2011a “Levels of Literacy”. In K. Radner and E. Robson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 68–88.Google Scholar
2011b “Domesticizing Babylonian Scribal Culture in Assyria: Transformation by Preservation”. In W.S. van Egmond and W.H. van Soldt (eds), Theory and Practice of Knowledge Transfer: Studies in School Education in the Ancient Near East and Beyond. Nederlands Institute voor het Nabije Oosten: Leiden, 11–24.Google Scholar
(2013) Lexical texts, Ancient Near East. In R. Bagnall, K. Broderson, C.B. Champion, A. Erskine, & S. Huebner (Eds.), The Encylopedia of Ancient History, First Edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visicato, G.
2000 The Power and the Writing: The Early Scribes of Mesopotamia. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar
von Soden, W.
1936 “Leistung und Grenze sumerischer und babylonischer Wissenschaft”. Die Welt als Geschichte 2: 411–464.Google Scholar
Wagensonner, K.
2007 “Early Lexical Lists Revisited: Structures and Classification as a Mnemonic Device”. In L. Kogan, N. Koslova, S. Loesov, and S. Tischenko (eds), Language in the Ancient Near East. (Proceedings of the 53rd Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale Vol. 1, Part 1.) Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 285–310.Google Scholar
Watson, R. and Horowitz, W.
2011 Writing Science Before the Greeks: A Naturalistic Analysis of the Babylonian Astronomical Treatise MUL.APIN. Leiden, Boston: Brill CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A.K.
2006 “Keeping the word: On orality and literacy (with a sideways glance at Navaho)”. Oral Tradition 21(2): 295–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, I.
2010 On Art in the Ancient Near East. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.
1997 “The nature of external representations in problem solving”. Cognitive Science 21(2): 179–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar