Article published In:
Pragmatics & CognitionVol. 29:1 (2022) ► pp.59–81
Mathematics, relevance theory and the situated cognition paradigm
Mathematics is a highly specialised arena of human endeavour, one in which complex notations are invented and are subjected to complex and involved manipulations in the course of everyday work. What part do these writing practices play in mathematical communication, and how can we understand their use in the mathematical world in relation to theories of communication and cognition? To answer this, I examine in detail an excerpt from a research meeting in which communicative board-writing practices can be observed, and attempt to explain the observed exchanges with reference to relevance theory (a cognitivist theory of pragmatics), in combination with the situated cognition paradigm. Successful communication in the excerpt appears well described by the notion of metacognitive acquaintance, as described in Sperber & Wilson (2015), especially when a situated view of cognition is adopted. Though this example is taken from a relatively informal face-to-face communicative situation, characteristics of such situations extend even into formal written mathematics, since even the technical terminology developed in the course of the meeting includes details that may provide readers with a kind of access to the mathematicians’ cognitive processes.
Keywords: cognitivism, situated cognition, relevance theory, pragmatics of mathematics, inferential model
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A very brief introduction to relevance theory
- 3.An example, metacognitively explained
- 4.Getting acquainted with cognition
- 5.Terminology, and the richness of a mental state
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Barany, Michael J.
2010 Mathematical research in context. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. MSc dissertation.
Bringsjord, Selmer
1998 Computationalism
is dead; now what? Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial
Intelligence 10(4). 393–402. 
Carston, Robyn
2002 Thoughts
and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit
communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cave, Terence & Deirdre Wilson
2018 Reading
beyond the code: Literature and relevance
theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Andy
2010 Supersizing
the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive
extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, Andy & David Chalmers
1998 The
extended
mind. Analysis 58(1). 7–19.
Clark, Billy
2013 Relevance
theory (Cambridge Textbooks in
Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Saussure, Louis & Tim Wharton
2020 Relevance,
effects and affect. International Review of
Pragmatics 12(2). 183–205.
Dreyfus, Hubert L.
1978 What computers can’t do: The limits of
artificial intelligence. New York: Harper Collins.
Forceville, Charles
2014 Relevance theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In David Machin (ed.), Visual communication, 51–70. Belrin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Greiffenhagen, Christian
2014 The
materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. The British Journal of
Sociology 65(3). 502–528.
Grice, H. Paul
1989 Studies in the way of
words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hutchins, Edwin
1995 Cognition
in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2010 Cognitive
ecology. Topics in Cognitive
Science 2(4). 705–715.
Kolaiti, Patricia
2019 The
limits of expression: Language, literature,
mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2020 Perceptual
relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary
Semantics 49(2). 99–117.
Lakatos, Imre
1976 Proofs
and refutations: The logic of mathematical
discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lane, Lorenzo
2016 The
bridge between worlds: Relating position and disposition in the mathematical
field. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
McCallum, Kate
2020 Situating mathematical communication: The settings, interactions and material practices of contemporary mathematical research. Brighton: University of Brighton PhD dissertation.
Noë, Alva
2009 Out
of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of
consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.
Pignocchi, Alessandro
2018 The
continuity between art and everyday communication. In Florian Cova & Sébastien Réhault (eds.), Advances
in experimental philosophy of
aesthetics, 241–264. London: Bloomsbury.
Putnam, Hilary
1991 Representation
and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, John R.
1980 Minds, brains, and
programs. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 3(3). 417–424.
1992 The rediscovery of the
mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver
1949 The
mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Sperber, Dan
1982 Apparently
irrational beliefs. In Martin Hollis & Steven Lukes (eds.), Rationality
and relativism, 149–180. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1997 Intuitive
and reflective beliefs. Mind &
Language 12(1). 67–83.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance:
Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2015 Beyond
speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of
Philosophy 15(2). 117–149.
Wharton, Tim
2008 “MeaningNN”
and “showing”: Gricean intentions and relevance-theoretic intentions. Intercultural
Pragmatics 5(2). 131–152.
Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
2019 Slave
to the passions: Making emotions relevant. In Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston (eds.), Relevance,
pragmatics and
interpretation, 253–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre
2017 Communication,
comprehension and ‘non-propositional effects’. Paper presented at
the
Beyond meaning conference, National and Kapodistrian University of
Athens.
2018 Relevance
theory and literary interpretation. In Terence Cave & Deirdre Wilson (eds.), Reading
beyond the code: Literature and relevance
theory, 185–204. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
2019 Pragmatics
and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of
Pragmatics 1451. 31–38.
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
2004 Relevance
theory. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The
handbook of
pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.