Article published In:
New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 252276
Bayard, Donn & Sateesh Krishnayya
2001Gender, expletive use, and context: Male and female expletive use in structured and unstructured conversation among New Zealand university students. Women and Language 24(1). 1–15.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1992Understanding utterances. An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3537–3550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Slurs and expletives: A case against a general account of expressive meaning. Language Sciences 521. 22–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Kate Burridge
2001Introducing English grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Bross, Fabian
2021On the interpretation of expressive adjectives: Pragmatics or Syntax? Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1). 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2000Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 121. 1–44.Google Scholar
2002Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013aWord meaning, what is said and explicature. In Carlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), What is said and what is not, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2013bImplicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy, 261–283. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Billy
2007 “Blazing a trail”: Moving from natural to linguistic meaning in accounting for the tones of English. In Randi A. Nilsen, Nana A. Appiah Amfo & Kaja Borthen (eds.), Interpreting utterances: Pragmatics and its interfaces. Essays in honour of Thorstein Fretheim, 69–81. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Carmella Hollo
2000English grammar. An introduction. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Daly, Nicola, Janet Holmes, Jonathan Newton & Maria Stubbe
2004Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36(5). 945–964. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian
1991Expletives: Men only? Communication Monographs 58(2). 156–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Brian Dillon & Charles Clifton
2015A note on interpreting damn expressives: Transferring the blame. Language and Cognition 7(2). 291–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1993A student’s grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P.
1957Meaning. Philosophical Review 661. 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2019The grammar of expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Jacqueline Guéron
1999English grammar. A generative perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, Alison
2017Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In Ilse Depraetere & Raphael Salkie (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line, 55–100. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Robert, Larry G. Coleman & John A. Daly
1980Expletives and androgyny. Anthropological Linguistics 22(3). 131–137.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1988English grammar. An outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Susan E.
1992Expletives of lower working-class women. Language in Society 21(2). 391–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
1992Sentential adverbs and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 193–214.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
2016Rethinking explicit utterance content. Journal of Pragmatics 1021. 24–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jay, Timothy B.
2005American women: Their cursing habits and religiosity. In Allyson Jule (ed.), Gender and the language of religion, 63–84. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Barbara K. & Barry S. Sapolsky
2004Offensive language in prime-time television: Four years after television age and content ratings. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 48(4). 554–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1988How gestures can become like words? In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Madella, Pauline
2020Prosodic pointing: From pragmatic awareness to pragmatic competence in Chinese hearers of L2 English. PhD dissertation, University of Brighton.
Mazzarella, Diana
2013‘Optimal relevance’ as a pragmatic criterion: The role of epistemic vigilance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 251. 20–45.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Laura A. & Lerita M. Coleman
1992Difference without dominance: Children’s talk in mixed- and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles 27(5–6). 241–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, David
1992Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Bróna
2009‘She’s a fucking ticket’: The pragmatics of fuck in Irish English – an age and gender perspective. Corpora 4(1). 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2009aTowards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1). 182–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bMight interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Łodź Papers in Pragmatics 5(2). 241–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Understanding and overcoming pragmatic failure in intercultural communication: From focus on speakers to focus on hearers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(1). 23–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Interlocutors-related and hearer-specific causes of misunderstanding: Processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance. Research in Language 15(1). 11–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018aExpressive APs and expletive NPs revisited: Refining the extant relevance-theoretic procedural account. Lingua 2051. 54–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bPragmatic competence injustice. Social Epistemology. A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 32(3). 143–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Qualifying insults, offensive epithets, slurs and expressive expletives: A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(2). 156–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020aTowards a relevance-theoretic approach to the diminutive morpheme. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24(4). 774–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020bEl malentendido. In Victoria Escandell Vidal, José Amenós Pons & Aoife Kathleen Ahern (eds.), Pragmática, 384–407. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
2022Is free enrichment always free? Revisiting ad hoc-concept construction. Journal of Pragmatics 1871. 130–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. Ad hoc concepts, affective attitude and epistemic stance. Pragmatics & Cognition.
Submitted. Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics.
Potts, Christopher
2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007aThe expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007bThe centrality of expressive indices. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 255–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François
1989The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4(4). 295–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate
2019Referring expressions, pragmatics, and style: Reference and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1994Understanding verbal understanding. In Jean Khalfa (ed.), What is intelligence? 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1995Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15(44). 117–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staley, Constance M.
1978Male-female use of expletives: A heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Linguistics 20(8). 367–380.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason
2000Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4). 391–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Making it articulated. Mind & Language 17(1–2). 149–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2001Natural pragmatics and natural codes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 131. 109–158.Google Scholar
2002Paul Grice, saying and meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 207–248.Google Scholar
2003Interjection, language, and the ‘showing/saying’ continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition 11(1). 39–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Pragmatics and prosody. In Keith Allan & Kasia Jazczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 567–584. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua 175–1761. 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2016Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua 175–1761. 5–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
2006Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language 21(3). 404–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics 1451. 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
1993Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1–2). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 249–287.Google Scholar
2004Relevance theory. In Larry Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton
2006Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1559–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2023. Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3  pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Piskorska, Agnieszka & Manuel Padilla Cruz
2023. Concepts and context in relevance-theoretic pragmatics. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.