Article published in:
New Developments in Relevance TheoryEdited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 299–320
Metaphor and mental shortcuts
The role of non-propositional effects
Elly Ifantidou | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Anna Piata | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Cognitive-pragmatic approaches to how metaphors are understood view the activation of perceptual or motor effects as inferred (Steinhart 2001; Bergen 2005; Wilson and Carston 2006; Carston 2010; Gibbs and de Macedo 2010; Wilson and Carston 2019). Crucially, inferences elicit conceptual representations, e.g. in the form of implicatures, and/or mental simulations, e.g. in the form of imagery, memory, an impression and other private elements. Emotional effects, being non-conceptual, must be left out of this picture. But evidence in neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics has shown that metaphors activate brain regions linked to emotions (for a review, see Ifantidou 2019; Citron 2020), and that in L2, in the absence of fully-propositional meaning (due to unknown words), metaphors yield meaningful interpretations by evoking imagery, impressions, emotions (Ifantidou 2019, 2021a, 2021b; Ifantidou and Hatzidaki 2019). Drawing on relevance-theoretic views, we would like to argue that metaphors are processed in not entirely propositional terms. Subjective experience heuristics (originally proposed as “availability heuristic” by Tversky and Kahneman 1974; Schwarzand and Wänke 2002; “affect heuristic” by Zajonc 1980) allows making rapid responses by absorbing emotions, imagery, impressions, into the interpretation process, an ability which outweighs (the need for) standard inferential reasoning processes. Such a position is likely to apply to non-metaphorical language, too and thus pervade linguistic processing in general.
Keywords: inference, emotion, imagery, perception, non-propositional meaning, relevance theory
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: The ‘affective’ turn in pragmatic inferencing
- 2.The nature of inference: What it involves
- 3.Are metaphors understood in entirely propositional terms?
- 4.Relevance theory and non-propositional content
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 27 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21009.ifa
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21009.ifa
References
Aggelopoulos, Nikolaos
Almäng, Jan
Baillargeon, Renée
Bergen, Benjamin
Bermúdez, José & Arnon Cahen
2008 Nonconceptual mental content. In Edward Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2020 Edition. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/content-nonconceptual/
Biehl, Martin, Christian Guckelsberger, Christoph Salge, Simón C. Smith & Daniel Polani
Borod, Joan C., Kashemi D. Rorie, Lawrence H. Pick, Ronald L. Bloom, Fani Andelman, Alfonso L. Campbell, Loraine K. Obler, James R. Tweedy, Joan Welkowitz & Martin Sliwinski
Boulenger, Veronique, Olaf Hauk & Friedemann Pulvermüller
Boulenger, Veronique, Yury Shtyrov & Friedemann Pulvermüller
Carston, Robyn
Citron, Francesca
Citron, Francesca & Adele E. Goldberg
Citron, Francesca, Jeremie Güsten, Nora Michaelis & Adele E. Goldberg
Citron, Francesca, Nora Michaelis & Adele E. Goldberg
Damasio, Antonio R.
Denison, Stephanie Mia
2012 Inductive inference in infants and young children: The role of probabilistic reasoning. Berkeley: University of California PhD Thesis.
de Saussure, Louis & Tim Wharton
Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
Gazes, Regina Paxton, Robert R. Hampton & Stella F. Lourenco
Gibbs, Raymond W.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Ana Cristina Pelosi Silva de Macedo
Hamilton, David L., Nate Way & Jacqueline M. Chen
Henry, Julie D., Louise H. Phillips, John R. Crawford, Magdalena Ietswaart & Fiona Summers
Hickson, Linda & Ishita Khemka
Holmes, Emily & Andrew Mathews
Ifantidou, Elly
Ifantidou, Elly & Anna Hatzidaki
Jończyk, Rafał
Kopp, Richard R.
Langacker, Ronald W.
Levin, Samuel R.
MacWhinney, Brian
Mahon, Bradford Z. & Alfonso Caramazza
Mazzone, Marco
Mitchell, Jason P.
Needham-Didsbury, Isabelle
2016 Interpreting metaphor: Perspectives from pragmatics and psychotherapy. London: UCL PhD thesis.
Piata, Anna
Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod
Pulvermüller, Friedemann
Rivera, Susan, Ann Wakeley & Jonas Langer
Sadoski, Mark & Allan Paivio
Santostefano, Sebastiano
Schwarzand, Norbert & Michaela Wänke
Shen, Zih-Yu, Yi-Ting Tsai & Chia-Lin Lee
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
Steinhart, Eric C.
Tversky, Amos & Daniel Kahneman, D.
van Berkum, Jos J. A.
Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
Wilson, Deirdre
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
Wilson, Deirdre
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
Zajonc, Robert B.