Article published in:
New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 347375
References
Akita, Kimi & Mark Dingemanse
2019Ideophones (mimetics, expressives). In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics 23 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Fabio
2006A relevance-theoretic approach to effort and effect in translation: Discussing the cognitive interface between inferential processing, problem-solving and decision-making. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Horizons in Theoretical Translation Studies. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
Alves, Fabio. & Jóse Luiz V. R. Gonçalves
2003A relevance theory approach to the investigation of inferential processes in translation. In Fabio Alves (ed.), Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Benjamins Translation Library 45). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Modelling translator’s competence. Relevance and expertise under scrutiny. In Y. Gambier, Miriam Shlesinger & Radegundis Stolze (eds.), Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies, 14–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Relevance and translation. In Yves Gambier & Luc van Doorslaer (eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies, Volume 11, 279–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. A relevance-theoretic analysis of micro and macro translation units. Target 25(1): 107–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Investigating the conceptual-procedural distinction in the translation process. A relevance-theoretic analysis of micro and macro translation units. In Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich & Sharon O’Brien (eds.), Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research, 109–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mona
1992In other words: a coursebook on translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W.
1999Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 221. 577–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartashova, Olga A. & Anton E. Sichinskiy
2014Japanese–English Onomatopoeic and Mimetic Parallels: The Problem of Translatability. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 21. 222–229.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane & Fabrizio Gallai
2014Discourse markers in free indirect style and interpreting. Journal of Pragmatics 601: 106–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bogucki, L.
2004The constraint of relevance in subtitling. Journal of Specialised Translation 11: 71–88.Google Scholar
2009aPragmatic considerations in translating films. In Piotr Cap (ed.), Pragmatics Today, 255–262. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009bAmateur subtitling on the Internet. In Jóse Díaz-Cintas and Gunilla Anderman (eds.), Audiovisual Translation: Language Transfer on Screen, 49–57. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020A relevance-theoretic approach to decision-making in subtitling. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Sabine
2016The importance of being relevant? A cognitive-pragmatic framework for conceptualising audiovisual translation. Target 28(2): 302–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The importance of being relevant? A cognitive-pragmatic framework for conceptualising audiovisual translation. In Yves Gambier and Sara Ramos Pinto (eds.), Audiovisual Translation. Theoretical and Methodological Challenges, 121–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2018Figurative language, mental imagery, and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol 33 (3). 198–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casas-Tost, Helena
2014Translating onomatopoeia from Chinese into Spanish: A corpus-based analysis. Perspectives 22 (1). 39–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edström, Bert
1989Japanese onomatopoetic words: A research note. Orientaliska Studier 651. 35–52.Google Scholar
Flyxe, Martin
2002Translation of Japanese onomatopoeia into Swedish (with focus on lexicalization). Africa & Asia 21. 54–73.Google Scholar
Gallai, Fabrizio
2016Point of view in free indirect thought and in community interpreting. Lingua 175–1761: 97–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019Cognitive pragmatics and translation studies. In Rebecca Tipton & Louisa Desilla (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Pragmatics, 51–72. Abingdon: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
1991Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1996On the nature of implicit information in literary translation: A relevance-theoretic perspective. Target 81: 239–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005On the significance of the cognitive core of translation. The Translator 11(1): 25–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Approaches to translation: relevance theory. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Relevance and translation: On the value of a good theoretical foundation of translation. In Ewa Wałaszewska, Marta Kisielewska-Krysiuk, & Agnieszka Piskorska (eds.), In the mind and across minds: A relevance-theoretical perspective on communication and translation, 292–310. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hayase, Mitsuaki
1978Characteristics of Japanese onomatopoeia observed through the English translation. Kanssai Gaikokugodaigaku Kenkyu Ronshu 281. 117–127.Google Scholar
Imai, Mutsumi, Sotaro Kita, Miho Nagumo & Hiroyuki Okada
2008Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition 109 (1). 54–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inose, Hiroko
2008Translating Japanese onomatopoeia and mimetic words. In Anthony Pym and Alexander Perekrestenko (eds.), Translation research projects 1 1. 97–116. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.Google Scholar
Kantartzis, Katerina, Mutsumi Imai & Sotaro Kita
2011Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science 35 (3). 575–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kubo, Atsuko
1995Miyazawa Kenji no Onomatope no Sekai [The world of onomatopoeia in Miyazawa Kenji’s Work]. Kobe Kaisei Review 341. 17–30.Google Scholar
Laing, Catherine E.
2014A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language 34 (5). 387–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1611. 32–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laing, Catherine
2018A role for onomatopoeia in early language: Evidence from phonological development. Language and Cognition 11 (2). 173–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laing, Catherine E.
2019Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: An analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development 15 (2). 177–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meinard, Maruszka Eve Marie
2015Distinguishing onomatopoeias from interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 761. 150–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minashima, Hiroshi
2004Nihhongo no onomatope [Onomatopoeia in Japanese]. Fukui Daigaku Kyoiku Chiiki Kagakubu Kiyou 601. 97–115.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter
1991About translation. Vol. 741. Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
1988A textbook of translation. London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Nygaard, Lynne C., Allison E. Cook & Laura L. Namy
2009Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition 112 (1). 181–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2019Qualifying insults, offensive epithets, slurs and expressive expletives. A relevance-theoretic approach. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7(2). 156–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohan, Olivia, Ryoko Sasamoto, & Rebecca Jackson
2018Argumentation, relevance theory and persuasion. An analysis of onomatopoeia in Japanese publications using manga stylistics. International Review of Pragmatics, 101: 219–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasamoto, Ryoko
2019Onomatopoeia and relevance. Communication of impressions via sound. London: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasamoto, Ryoko & Rebecca Jackson
2016Onomatopoeia – showing-word or saying-word? Relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions’. Lingua, 1751: 36–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, & Deirdre Wilson
2015Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2). 117–149.Google Scholar
Tamori, Ikuhiro & Lawrence Clifford Schourup
1999Onomatope: keitai-to imi [Onomatopoeia: form and meaning]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Tipton, Rebecca & Louisa Desilla
2019The Routledge handbook of translation and pragmatics. Oxon/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2003Interjections, language, and the “showing/saying” continuum. Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (1). 39–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008“Meaningnn” and “showing”: Gricean intentions and relevance-theoretic intentions. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(2). 131–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Recipes: Beyond the words. Gastronomica: The Journal of Food and Culture 10 (4). 67–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua 175–1761. 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wrembel, Magdalena
2010Sound symbolism in foreign language phonological acquisition. Research in Language 8 (1). 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar