Article published in:
New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 321346
Anderson, Michael
2010Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 331: 245–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bambini, Valentina, Chiara Bertini, Walter Schaeken, Alessandra Stella and Francesco di Russo
2016Disentangling metaphor from context: an ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon
1995Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence
1999Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (22): 577–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Grounded cognition: past, present and future. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (22): 577–660.Google Scholar
Bergquist, Patricia
1974Phylum porifera. In Textbook of zoology invertebrates, 7th ed., ed. by Marshall, Andrew J. and Vale William Williams, 76–103. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2001Metaphor and what is said: a defense of a direct expression view of metaphor, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 1: 156–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max
1955Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 55 (19): 273–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14): 3537–3550. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Block, Ned
1983Mental pictures and cognitive science. The Philosophical Review 93, Vol. 4 1: 499–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, Jack & Sandra Vehrencamp
1998Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Byrne, Richard & Andrew Whiten
eds. 1988Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elizabeth
2006Metaphor and that certain ‘je ne sais quoi’. Philosophical Studies, 129 1: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165 (3):321-345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1101: 295–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol: 198–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cave, Terence & Deirdre Wilson
2018Reading beyond the code: literature and relevance theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Dorothy & Robert Seyfarth
1990How monkeys see the world: inside the mind of another species. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andy
1999An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (9): 345–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collingwood, Robin George
1938The principles of art. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Louis & Tim Wharton
2021Before meaning: creature construction, sea-sponges, lizards and Humean projection. In Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure & Tim Wharton (eds.) Beyond meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1994Descartes Error. Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1978What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 31–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel
1978Beliefs about beliefs. Behavior and Brain Sciences 4 1: 568–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Brainstorms: philosophical aims on mind and psychology. MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deplanque, Sylvie & David Sander
2021A fascinating but risky case of reverse inference: From measures to emotions! Food Quality and Preferences. Volume 921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe
2013Appraisal theory: old and new questions. Emotion Review: 125–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fabb, Nigel
2021Experiences of ineffable significance. In Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure & Wharton (eds.) Beyond meaning, 135–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fridland, E. R.
2015Skill, non-propositional thought, and the cognitive penetrability of perception. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 461: 105–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genovesi, Chris
2020Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism. Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 17–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Ray
1994The poetics of mind: figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics. 341: 457–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2008How metaphors create categories – quickly. Gibbs, Raymond (ed.) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golding, Alexandra
2016Metaphor in the embodied mind: beyond the propositionality of figurative language. PhD thesis. University of Brighton.
Goleman, Daniel
1995Emotional intelligence, New York, Bantam Books Inc.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1957Meaning. Philosophical Review 661: 377–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975aLogic and conversation. In Cole, P. and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41–58.Google Scholar
1975bMethod in philosophical psychology (from the Banal to the Bizarre). Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 481: 23–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1982Meaning revisited. In Smith, Neil (ed.) Mutual knowledge. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernest-August
2013How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication? Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Elaine, John Cacioppo & Richard Rapson
1994Emotional contagion. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc
1996The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Nicholas
1984Consciousness regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huron, David
2006Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1999What is meaning? Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Ms.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
2003Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Alan
1994ToMM, ToBY and Agency: core architecture and domain-specificity. In Hirschfeld, Lawrence & Susan Gelman. eds. Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 119–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Mark
2000Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin 1261: 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Ernie & Matthew Stone
2010Against Metaphorical Meaning. Topoi 29 (2): 165–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia
2019The limits of expression: language, literature, mind. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press a. From a poetics of language to a poetics of action: literature and art as a cognitive object. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
in press b. Perceptual relevance and art: some tentative suggestions. Journal of Literary Semantics 49: 2. Crossref
Longhitano, Sabina
2014Communicating the ineffable: A pragmatic account of literariness. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences. Vol. 1581: 187–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, Aloysius
1984A theory for metaphor. Journal of Literary Semantics 13(1): 35–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, Colin
2004Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Michaels, Anne
1991Miner’s Pond: poems. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
1992Unseen formations. Open Letter 8.41: 96–99.Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques
2009Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication? Social Science Information 48(3): 447–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moors, Agnes, Phoebe Ellsworth, Klaus Scherer & Nico Frijda
2013Appraisal theories of emotion: state of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 51: 119–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neale, Stephen
1992Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy 15.51: 509–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, Andrew
1975Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory 251: 45–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2009aTowards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 182–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bMight interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Łodź Papers in Pragmatics 5 (2): 241–270.Google Scholar
Pignocchi, Alessandro
2012History and intentions in the experience of artworks. Topoi 331: 477–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian
2000Poetic effects: a relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piskorska, Agnieszka
2012Cognition and emotions–a joint effort at obtaining positive cognitive effects? In Relevance studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on language and communication. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press: 102–111.Google Scholar
2016Perlocutionary effects and relevance theory. In Padilla Cruz, Manuel (ed.), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions, 287–305. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
2007aThe expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33 ( 2 ): 165–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bThe centrality of expressive indices. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 255–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Proust, Marcel
1922–1931À la recherche du temps erdu. In search of lost time, translated by Scott-Moncrieff, Charles Kenneth, Terence Kilmartin & Andreas Mayor (Vol. 71). Revised by D. J. Enright. London: Chatto and Windus, New York: The Modern Library 1992 Based on the French La Pléiade edition (1987–89).Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Zenon
1973What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80 ( 1 ): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur, & William Hirstein
1999The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 61: 15–51.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
1993Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges
1981Introduction: What are mental images? In Block, Ned (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology: 117–127. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1980Functionalism and the emotions. In Rorty, Amélie (ed.) Explaining emotions, 163–198. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sander, David, Jordan Grafman & Tiziana Zalla
2003The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 14 (4): 303–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis & Peter Schulz
2009Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica (173): 397–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis & Wharton
2020Relevance, effect and affect. International Review of Pragmatics, John Benjamin: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schooler, Jonathan & Joseph Melcher, J.
1994The ineffability of insight. In Smith, Steven, Thomas Ward, & Ronald Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 97–133.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan
1996Explaining culture: a naturalistic approach. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Oliver Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi & Deirdre Wilson
2010Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language 251: 359–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (1st and 2nd eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV (44): 117–149.Google Scholar
1998The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Carruthers, Peter & Jill Boucher. (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, 184–200. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008A deflationary account of metaphors. In Gibbs, Ray. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, p. 84–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason
2011Know how. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tendahl, Markus & Raymond Gibbs
2008Complementary perspectives on metaphor: cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1823–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Coupling of metaphoric cognition and communication: a reply to Deirdre Wilson. Intercultural Pragmatics 8–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo
1897What is art? (translated by Pevear, Richard & Larissa Volokhonsky 1995) Hanworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Melinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll
2005Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 281: 675 – 691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, John & Leda Cosmides
2008The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed., ed. by Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett: 114–137. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Tye, Michael
2004On the non-conceptual content of experience. In Reicher, Marie & Johan Marek (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium, 221–239. Vienna: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2003aInterjections, language and the ‘showing’/‘saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition. Vol. 11–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003bNatural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind and Language Volume 18, No. 5: 447–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua. 175–176: 20–35.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey
2019Slave to the passions: making emotions relevant. In Relevance, pragmatics and interpretation, ed. by Robyn Carston, Billy Clark, and Kate Scott, 253–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander & Steve Oswald
2021Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics, 1811: 259–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Studies. 8–21: 177–196.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston
2019Pragmatics and the challenge of non-propositional effects. Journal of Pragmatics 1451: 31–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2018Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Cave, T. & Wilson, D. (eds.) Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco (Paco)
2016Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1): 92–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar