Article published in:
New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 228251
References
Asher, Nicholas & Julie Hunter
2012Aspectual coercions in content composition. In Luna Filipović & Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Human Cognitive Processing, Vol. 371, 55–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baranzini, Laura & Louis de Saussure
2017Le futur épistémique en italien: de la modalité à l’évidentialité. In Laura Baranzini (ed.), Le futur dans les langues romanes, 299–316, Berne: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbet, Cécile & Louis de Saussure
2012Sporadic aspect as a pragmatic enrichment of root modality. In Cinzia Russi & Chiyo Nishida (eds), Building a bridge between communities of the Old and New Worlds : Current research in tense, aspect, mood and modality, 25–43. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Damourette, Jacques & Edouard Pichon
1911–1936Des mots à la pensée. Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: D’Artrey, volume V.Google Scholar
Dölling, Johannes
2014Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure. In Klaus Robering (ed), Aspects, phases and arguments: Topics in the semantics of verbs, 189–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of verbs and Times in generative Semantics and in Montagues’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egg, Markus
2005Flexible Semantics for Reinterpretation Phenomena. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Manuel Leonetti
2011On the rigidity of procedural meaning. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (CRISPI 25), 81–102. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, Laurent
2015Conflits et mécanismes de résolution dans le domaine aspectuo-temporel : applications à la rhétorique des pointes. In: Aude Lafferrière & Marc Durain (eds), « Ce mot qui m’avait surpris … ». Conflits et décalages de langage, 59–74. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1992The present perfect puzzle, Language 681. 525–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lascarides, Alex & Nicholas Asher
1993Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment, Linguistics and Philosophy 161. 437–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Robert
1971Temps et aspect. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Moens, Marc and Mark Steedman
1988Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics 141. 15–28.Google Scholar
Piñango, Maria, Edgar Zurif and Ray Jackendoff
1999Real-time processing implications of enriched composition and the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 281, 395–414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J.
1995An Ontology for event semantics. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Pickering, Martin J., Brian McElree, Steven Frisson, Lillian Chen & Matthew J. Traxler
2006Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion. Disourse Processes (42–2). 131–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior. Language and Linguistics Compass 21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pulman, Stephen
1997Aspectual shift as type coercion. Transactions of the Philological Society 951. 279–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of symbolic logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli
2002The present tense is vacuous. Snippets 6 (11). 12–13.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis
2003Temps et pertinence. Bruxelles: De Boeck. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On some methodological issues in the conceptual / procedural distinction. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (CRISPI 25), 55–79. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Kasia Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), Time : Language, cognition and reality, 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Future reference and current relevance with the French composed past. In Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhaïl Kissine & Saghie Sharifzadeh (eds), Future times, Future tenses, 247–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2471.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis & Patrick Morency
2012 [online 2011] A cognitive pragmatic view of the French epistemic future, Journal of French Language Studies 22–021. 207–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Neil
1990Observations on the pragmatics of tense. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 113–46.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell (1st edition 1986).Google Scholar
1998The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Peter Carruthers and Jill Boucher (eds), Thoughts and language, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sthioul, Bertrand
1998Le passé composé: une approche instructionnelle. In Svetlana Vogeleer, Andrée Borillo, Carl Vetters & M. Vuillaume (eds), Temps et discours, 79–94. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
2000aAspect et inferences. Cahiers de linguistique française 221, 165–188.Google Scholar
2000bL’imparfait comme expression procédurale. In Jean-Emmanuel Tyvaert (ed.), L’imparfait, Recherches en Linguistique et Psychologie cognitive 151, Presses Universitaires de Reims, 53–71.Google Scholar
Therriault, David J. & Gary Raney
2007Processing and Representing Temporal Information in Narrative Text. Discourse Processes (43–2). 173–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Todorova, Marina, Kathy Straub, William Badecker & Robert Frank
2000Aspectual Coercion and the Online Computation of Sentential Aspect 6.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 561, 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilmet, Marc
1998Grammaire critique du français. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2011The conceptual-procedural distinction : Past, present and future. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives (CRISPI 25), 3–32. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
1993Pragmatics and time. UCL Working papers in Linguistics 51, 277–300.Google Scholar
1998Pragmatics and time. In Robyn Carston & Seiji Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar