Article published In:
Diagrammatic ReasoningEdited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 244–263
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 244–263
Iconicity
From sign to system in human communication and language
Nicolas Fay | School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009
This paper explores the role of iconicity in spoken language and other human communication systems. First, we concentrate on graphical and gestural communication and show how semantically motivated iconic signs play an important role in creating such communication systems from scratch. We then consider how iconic signs tend to become simplified and symbolic as the communication system matures and argue that this process is driven by repeated interactive use of the signs. We then consider evidence for iconicity at the level of the system in graphical communication and finally draw comparisons between iconicity in graphical and gestural communication systems and in spoken language.
Keywords: symbols, signs, icons, language origin, communication, language
References (64)
Armstrong, D.F., & Wilcox, S. (2007). The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press, USA. 
Bergen, B.K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2), 290–311.
Boye, K., & Harder, P. (2012). A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44.
Bromberg, I. (2007). Systematicity in the Arabic Mental Lexicon. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (Vol. 2891, pp. 3–18).
Caldwell, C.A., & Smith, K. (2012). Cultural Evolution and Perpetuation of Arbitrary Communicative Conventions in Experimental Microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807.
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509.
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R, & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 1461, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004.
Clark, H.H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 221, 1–39.
Ellison, T.M. (2001). Induction and Inherent Similarity. In M. Ramscar & U. Hahn (Eds.), Similarity and Categorization (pp. 29–50). Oxford University Press.
Ellison, T.M., Fay, N., & Garrod, S. (in preparation). From Signs to Structure: The Immediate Emergence of Systematicity in an Interactive Communication Game.
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S. (2013). How to Bootstrap a Human Communication System. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367.
Fay, N., & Ellison, T.M. (2013). The Cultural Evolution of Human Communication Systems in Different Sized Populations: Usability Trumps Learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781.
Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L. (2008). The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363(1509), 3553–3561.
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N. (2010). The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351–386.
Fay, N., Lister, C.J., Ellison, T.M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Creating a Communication System from Scratch: Gesture Beats Vocalization Hands Down. Frontiers in Psychology, 51: 354.
Fischer, O. (2006). Grammaticalization and iconicity: Two interacting processes.
Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 511, 696–719.
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 737–767.
Galantucci, B., & Garrod, S. (2011). Experimental Semiotics: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11), 1–15.
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T. (2010). The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 100–111.
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987.
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Swoboda, N. (2010). Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Butcher, C., Mylander, C., & Dodge, M. (1994). Nouns and Verbs in A Self-Styled Gesture System: What′ s in A Name? Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 259–319.
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1-3), 335–346.
Hauser, M., Yang, C., Berwick, R., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M., Watumull, J.,. . . Lewontin, R. (2014). The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 401.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework (Vol. 1571): University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J.J. (2006). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.
Hockett, C.F. (1960). Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In W. Lanyon & W. Tavolga (Eds.), Animal sounds and communication (pp. 392–430). Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Hupet, M., & Chantraine, Y. (1992). Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 211, 485–496.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children. Cognitive Science, 35(3), 575–586.
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through Contact: Sign Language Emergence and Sign Language Change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony and Development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.
Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Kohler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Krauss, R.M., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in the length of reference phrases as a function of social interaction: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 11, 113–114.
. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 343–346.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A. (2011). The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325.
Morford, J.P. (1996). Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people. Language and Communication, 16(2), 165–178.
Nowak, M. (2000). The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature, 404(6777), 495–498.
Peirce, C.S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1-81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8).
. (2014). Iterative vocal charades: the emergence of conventions in vocal communication. In E.A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.),
The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10
). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 2771, 1–15.
Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2011). Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529.
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural-Language and Natural-Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726.
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (1999). The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11(03), 315–342.
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hubbard, E.M. (2001). Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3–34.
Robinson, J.H., & Griffith, P.L. (1979). On the scientific status of iconicity. Sign Language Studies, 25(1), 297–315.
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford University Press.
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2661–2665.
Sauter, D.A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S.K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2408–2412.
Schmidtke, D., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A.M. (2014). Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411–417.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G.R.S. (2009). Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–233.
Selten, R., & Warglien, M. (2007). The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1041, 7361–7366.
Shillcock, R., Kirby, S., McDonald, S., & Brew, C. (2001). Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Paper presented at the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
Smith, A.D.M. (2014). Models of language evolution and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 281–293.
Tamariz, M. (2008). Exploring systematicity between phonological and context-cooccurrence representations of the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon, 3(2).
. (2011). Linguistic Structure Evolves to Match Meaning Structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Tamariz, M., Ellison, T.M., Barr, D.J., & Fay, N. (2014). Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788).
Theisen, C.A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S. (2010). Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32.
Urban, M. (2011). Conventional sound symbolism in terms for organs of speech: A cross-linguistic study. Folia Linguistica, 45(1), 199–213.
Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Hawkins, Robert D., Megumi Sano, Noah D. Goodman & Judith E. Fan
2023. Visual resemblance and interaction history jointly constrain pictorial meaning. Nature Communications 14:1 
Moita, Mara, Ana Maria Abreu & Ana Mineiro
2023. Iconicity in the emergence of a phonological system?. Journal of Language Evolution 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wisher, Izzy & Kristian Tylén
2023. On the semiotic and material constraints of ideographies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46
Cherkes, Bohdan & Yuliya Idak
2022. The phenomenon of the city in the contemporary discourse of urban history. Architectural Studies 8:2
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, T. Mark Ellison, Zachary Blundell, Naomi De Kleine, Murray Garde, Casey J. Lister & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2022. Gesture is the primary modality for language creation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289:1970
Slonimska, Anita, Asli Özyürek & Olga Capirci
2022. Simultaneity as an Emergent Property of Efficient Communication in Language: A Comparison of Silent Gesture and Sign Language. Cognitive Science 46:5
Woźniak, Mateusz & Guenther Knoblich
2022. Communication and action predictability: two complementary strategies for successful cooperation. Royal Society Open Science 9:9
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Nikolay Panayotov, Sheila Cunningham & Monica Tamariz
2021. Amount of Learning and Signal Stability Modulate Emergence of Structure and Iconicity in Novel Signaling Systems. Cognitive Science 45:11
Mineiro, Ana, Inmaculada Concepción Báez-Montero, Mara Moita, Isabel Galhano-Rodrigues & Alexandre Castro-Caldas
2021. Disentangling Pantomime From Early Sign in a New Sign Language: Window Into Language Evolution Research. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Monaghan, Padraic & Seán G. Roberts
2021. Iconicity and Diachronic Language Change. Cognitive Science 45:4
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
2021. Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review. Language and Speech 64:1 ► pp. 52 ff.
Planer, Ronald J. & David Kalkman
2021. Arbitrary Signals and Cognitive Complexity. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72:2 ► pp. 563 ff.
Shea, Kaela, Olivier St-Cyr & Tom Chau
2021. Ecological Design of an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device Interface. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 15:4 ► pp. 175 ff.
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Lister, C.J., B. Walker & N. Fay
2020. Innovation and enculturation in child communication: a cross-sectional study. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello
2019. Natural reference: A phylo‐ and ontogenetic perspective on the comprehension of iconic gestures and vocalizations. Developmental Science 22:2
Castillo, Lucía, Kenny Smith & Holly P. Branigan
2019. Interaction Promotes the Adaptation of Referential Conventions to the Communicative Context. Cognitive Science 43:8
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Alison Gibson & Margaret Jamieson
2019. Adults are more efficient in creating and transmitting novel signalling systems than children. Journal of Language Evolution 4:1 ► pp. 44 ff.
Worthington, Maulfry, Marjolein Dobber & Bert van Oers
2019. The development of mathematical abstraction in the nursery. Educational Studies in Mathematics 102:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Cohn, Neil
2018. Combinatorial Morphology in Visual Languages. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 175 ff.
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
2018. Repeated imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1874 ► pp. 20172709 ff.
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda & Simon Garrod
2018. How to Create Shared Symbols. Cognitive Science 42:S1 ► pp. 241 ff.
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata, Takugo Fukaya, Yasuhiro Katagiri & Simon Garrod
2018. Universal Principles of Human Communication: Preliminary Evidence From a Cross‐cultural Communication Game. Cognitive Science 42:7 ► pp. 2397 ff.
Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2018. The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system. Cognition 181 ► pp. 93 ff.
Lister, Casey J. & Nicolas Fay
2017. How to create a human communication system. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 314 ff.
Misyak, Jennifer, Takao Noguchi & Nick Chater
2016. Instantaneous Conventions. Psychological Science 27:12 ► pp. 1550 ff.
Rogers, Shane L., Nicolas Fay & Rachel L Kendal
2016. Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically. PLOS ONE 11:7 ► pp. e0159570 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.