Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 22:3 (2014) ► pp.325–339

An exploration of the interrelationships among EFL learners’ English self-efficacy, metacognitive awareness, and their test performance

A structural equation modeling approach

 | Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
This study examined the interrelationships among selected cognitive characteristics of Iranian EFL learners including English self-efficacy, metacognitive awareness, and their test performance. For this purpose, a model was proposed based on empirical studies and was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). Following this, two questionnaires were administrated to 200 Iranian EFL learners of two language institutes in Mashhad, Iran. Results of this study indicated that Iranian EFL learners perceived themselves self-efficacious. They were also metacognitively aware of their learning process. Correlation analysis results showed that metacognitive awareness statistically correlated with English self-efficacy and foreign language test performance. It was found that English self-efficacy significantly correlated with foreign language test performance as well. The proposed SEM model adequately fitted the data. Results of the SEM indicated that self-efficacy was the strongest direct predictor of learners’ test performance. Metacognitive awareness directly affected learners’ English self-efficacy. It also indirectly affected test performance through affecting English self-efficacy.
Keywords: Foreign language achievement, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Metacognitive awareness, Self-efficacy
Published online: 29 September 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.3.03gou
References (37)
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health, 13(4), 623–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14(2), 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradford, S.B., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. Faculty Publications – Human Resource Studies. [URL].Google Scholar
Cao, L., & Nietfeld, J.L. (2007). College students’ metacognitive awareness of difficulties in learning the class content does not automatically lead to adjustment of study strategies. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 71, 31–46.Google Scholar
Carr, A. (2004). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cihanoglu, M.O. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of teacher candidates. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 461, 4529–4533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In L.F. Bachman & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research (pp. 90–111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coutinho, S. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 71, 39–47.Google Scholar
Coronado-Aliegro, J. (2007). The effect of self-assessment on the self-efficacy of students studying Spanish as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Devine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J.G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 105–127). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research method in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive—developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghanizadeh, A., & Moafian, F. (2011). The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ sense of self-efficacy and their pedagogical success in language institutes. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 249–72.Google Scholar
Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2013). Self-efficacy and self-regulation and their relationship: A study of Iranian EFL teachers. The Language Learning Journal, 41(1), 68–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghonsooly, B., Elahi, M., & Golparvar, S.E. (2012). General English university students’ self-efficacy and their achievement. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(3), 153–173.Google Scholar
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Isaacson, R.M., & Fujita, F. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge monitoring and self-regulated learning: Academic success and reflections on learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 39–55.Google Scholar
Iskandar, T.M., & Sanusi, Z.M. (2011). Assessing the effect of self-efficacy and task complexity on international control audit judgment. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 29–52.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.W. (2002). Enhancing self-efficacy and learning performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 701, 243–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 91, 285–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pajares, F. (2001). Toward a positive psychology of academic motivation: The role of self-efficacy beliefs. In R. Gilman, E.S. Huebner, & M.J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 149–160). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D.H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Pishghadam, R., & Khajavi, Gh. H. (2013).Intelligence and metacognition as predictors of foreign language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 241, 176–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pour-Mohammadi, M., & Abidin, M.J.Z. (2011). Test-taking strategies, schema theory and reading comprehension test performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 237–243.Google Scholar
Pour-Mohammadi, M., &Abidin, M.J.Z. (2012). Does instructing test-taking strategies significantly enhance reading comprehension test performance? The case of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 293–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahemi, J. (2007). Self-efficacy in English and Iranian senior high school students majoring in humanities.Novitas-ROYAL, 1(2), 98–111.Google Scholar
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 191, 143–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 261, 113–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994).Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 191, 460–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, J.B., Amaury, N., Stage, F.K., Barlow, E.A., & King, J. (2006).Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siam, E.N., & Soozandehfar, M.A. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 36(1).Google Scholar
Siegler, R.S. and Jenkins, E. (1989).How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tseng, W.T., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 271, 78–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenden, A. 1998. Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Great Britain: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Williams, M., & Burden, R.L. (1997). Psychology of language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, L.J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 2(1), 37–59.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Zhang, Ruofei & Di Zou
2024. Self-regulated second language learning: a review of types and benefits of strategies, modes of teacher support, and pedagogical implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning 37:4 ► pp. 720 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Shanyu, Esra Sipahi Döngül, Serdar Vural Uygun, Mutlu Başaran Öztürk, Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy & Pham Van Tuan
2022. Exploring the Relationship between Abusive Management, Self-Efficacy and Organizational Performance in the Context of Human–Machine Interaction Technology and Artificial Intelligence with the Effect of Ergonomics. Sustainability 14:4 ► pp. 1949 ff. DOI logo
Razmi, Mohammad Hasan, Ali Akbar Jabbari & Ali Mohammad Fazilatfar
2020. Perfectionism, Self-Efficacy Components, and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Use: A Multicategorical Multiple Mediation Analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 49:6 ► pp. 1047 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Ruofei, Gary Cheng, Xieling Chen & Haoran Xie
2020. Game-based self-regulated language learning: Theoretical analysis and bibliometrics. PLOS ONE 15:12 ► pp. e0243827 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.