Article published In:
New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1] 2016
► pp. 1652
References
Andrighetto, G. and Castelfranchi, C.
2013 “Norm compliance. The prescriptive power of normative actions.” Paradigmi, Vol. 21. Roma: Angeli, 120–135.Google Scholar
Arbib, M.A.
2005 “From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 281: 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argyle, M.
1972 “Nonverbal communication in human social interaction.” In R. Hinde (ed), Non-verbal Communication. New York: Cambridge, 443.Google Scholar
Austin, J.
1958 “Pretending.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. 321. London: Harrison and Sons, 261–278.Google Scholar
Bacharach, M. and Gambetta, D.
2001 “Trust in signs.” In K. Cook (ed) Trust and Social Structure, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bara, B.
1999Pragmatica cognitiva: I processi mentali della comunicazione. Bollati Boringhieri Editore, TorinoGoogle Scholar
Beckers, R. Holland, H. and Deneubourg, J.L.
1996 “From local to global tasks stigmergy and collective robotics.” In Rodney A. Brooks and Pattie Maes (eds), Artificial Life IV.Google Scholar
Bird R.B. and Smith E.A.
2005 “Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital.” Current Antropology 461: 221–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Castelfranchi, C.
1992“No more cooperation, please! In search of the social structure of verbal interaction.” In A. Ortony, J. Slack and O. Stock (eds), A.I. and Cognitive Science Perspectives on Communication. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “The theory of social functions.” Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 21: 5–38. Elsevier. [URL]. DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “ToM and BIC: Intentional behavioral communication as based on the theory of mind.” In Proc. AISB Symp. on Social Virtual Agents. 371Google Scholar
2006.From conversation to interaction via behavioral communication. For a semiotic design of objects, environments, and behaviors.” In S. Bagnara, and Crampton Smith G. (eds), Theories and Practice in Interaction Design. Mawach, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
2013 “Goal-directness.” In B. Kaldis (ed), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. London: SAGE, 900–902. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castelfranchi, C. and Poggi, Isabella
1994Lying as pretending to give information. In H. Parret (ed.), Pretending to Communicate. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 276–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castelfranchi, C. and Giardini, F.
2006 “Behavioural implicit communication: Hints about the origins of communication, gestures and language.” In J.M. Hombert et al. (ed), Towards the Origins of Language and Languages.Google Scholar
Connelly, B L., Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D. and Reutzel, C.R.
2011 “Signaling theory: A review and assessment.” Journal of Management 371: 39–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conte, R and Castelfranchi, C.
1995Cognitive and Social Action. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M.C.
2002From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language. Harvard.Google Scholar
Dynel, M.
2011a “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception.” International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “Turning speaker meaning on its head. Non-verbal communication and intended meaning.” Pragmatics & Cognition 19(3): 422–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “No child’s play: A philosophical pragmatic view of overt pretence as a vehicle for conversational humour.” In V. Tsakona and J. Chovanec (eds). Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eco, U.
1976A Theory of Semiotics. London, Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W.V.
1969 “The repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Cafegories, Origins, Usage, and Coding.” Semiotica: 49–98.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
1979 “Ritual and ritualization from a biological perspective.” In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies and D. Ploog (eds), Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–55.Google Scholar
Fein, G.
1981 “Pretend play in childhood: An integrative review.” Child Development, 521, 1095–1118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givens, D B.
2003Nonverbal Dictionary of Gestures, Signs and Body Language Cues. Spokane, Washington: Center for Nonverbal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Gendler, T.
2013 “Imagination.” The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL = [URL].Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
1956The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Grafen, A.
1990 “Biological signals as handicaps.” Journal of Theoretical Bioloogy 1441: 517–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, P.H.
1989Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. and Dawkins, R.
1984 “Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation.” In JR Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds), Behavioural Ecology: An evolutionary approach (2nd edition). Sinauer, 380–402.Google Scholar
Johnstone, R.A.
1997 “The evolution of animal signals.” In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (4th edition), J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies (eds), 155–178, Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langland-Hassan, P.
2014 “What it is to pretend.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M. and Castelfranchi, C.
1995Le Difese della Mente. Profili Cognitivi. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. and Stich, S.
2000 “A cognitive theory of pretense.” Cognition 741: 115–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Németh, E.T.
2008 “Verbal information transmission without communicative intention.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5-21: 153–176.Google Scholar
Noble, J.
1998a “The evolution of communication with and without conflicts of interest: An argument for modelling proto-proto-language”. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on the Evolution of Language , London, UK, 6–9 April.
1998bThe Evolution of Animal Communication Systems: Questions of Function Examined through Simulation. PhD thesis, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Poggi, I.
2001 “The Italian gestionary. Meaning representation, ambuguity, and context.” In C. Mueller and R. Posner (eds), Proceeding of the Symposium on the Semantics and Pragmatics of everyday Gestures. Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz.Google Scholar
Posner, R.
1992 “Believing, causing, intending: The basis for a hierarchy of sign concepts in the reconstruction of communication.” In R.J. Jorna, B. van Heusden and R. Posner (eds), Signs, Search, and Communication: The Semiotic Aspects of Artficial Intelligence. Berlin, de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2003 “Everyday gestures as a result of ritualization.” In M. Rector, I. Poggi and N. Trigo (eds), “Gestures, Meanings, and Use”. Universidade Ferdinando Pessoa, 217–229.Google Scholar
Riley, J.
1979 “Information equilibrium.” Econometrica 471: 331–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, S.
1977 “The determination of financial structure: The incentive signaling approach.” Bell Journal of Economics 81: 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de
1916 Cours de linguistique générale, ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger, Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.
1960The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J.
1975“The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History VI1, No.2.Google Scholar
1995The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Spece, M.
1973 “Job larket signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 871: 296–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tummolini, L. and Castelfranchi, C.
2006 “Trace signals: The meanings of stigmergy.” E4MAS: 141–156Google Scholar
2006b “The cognitive and behavioral mediation of institutions: Towards an account of institutional actions.” Cognitive Systems Research 71(2–3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tummolini L., Andrighetto G., Castelfranchi C. and Conte, R.
2013 “A convention or (tacit) agreement betwixt us: On reliance and its normative consequences.” Synthese 190(4): 585–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T.
1899The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. Macmilla, US.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. and C. Castelfranchi
1981How to lie while saying the truth. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà and J. Verschueren (eds), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics , Urbino, July 8–14, 1979. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 749–777. DOI logo
Watzlavich, P, Beavin, J.H. and Jackson, D.D.
1967Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Zahavi, A. and Zahavi, A.
1997The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J.
2014Bodily mimesis and the transition to speech. In M. Pina and N. Gontier (eds), The Evolution of Social Communication in Primates. Berlin: Springer, 165–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar