Article published in:
New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
Edited by Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1] 2016
► pp. 92116
Akimoto, Y., Sugiura, M., Yomogida, Y., Miyauchi, C.M., Miyazawa, S. and Kawashima, R
2014 “Irony comprehension: Social conceptual knowledge and emotional response”. Human Brain Mapping 351: 1167–1178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, H. and Janney, R.W
1991 “Verbal, prosodic, and kinesic emotive contrasts in speech”. Journal of Pragmatics 151: 521–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aune, K.S
1997 “Self and partner perceptions of the appropriateness of emotions”. Communication Reports 10(2): 133–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bromberek-Dyzman, K
2012 “Affective twist in irony processing”. Humana.Mente 231: 83–111.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. and Janney, R.W
1994 “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication”. Journal of Pragmatics 221: 325–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. and Hall, A
2011 “Implicature and explicature”. In H-J. Schmid and D. Geeraerts (eds), Cognitive Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–84.Google Scholar
Curcó, C
2000 “Irony: Negation, echo and metarepresentation”. Lingua 1101: 257–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fussell, Susan R
2002“The verbal communication of emotion: Introduction and overview.” In S.R. Fussell (ed), The Verbal Communication of Emotions. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah: L.E.A., 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, J
2010 “Irony is critical”. Pragmatics & Cognition 18(2): 397–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Leggitt, J.S. and Turner, E.A
2002 “What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication?” In S.R. Fussell (ed), The Verbal Communication of Emotions. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Mahwah: L.E.A., 125–149.Google Scholar
Gutt, E.-A
2013 “How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication?Draft.Google Scholar
Hess, U
2001 “The experience of emotion: Situational influences on the elicitation and experience of emotions”. In A. Kaszniak (ed), Emotions, Qualia, and Consciousness. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 386–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langlotz, A. and Locher, M.A
2013 “The role of emotions in relational work”. Journal of Pragmatics 581: 87–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.O
2014 “Communication mechanism of ironic discourse”. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 521: 147–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leggitt, J.S. and Gibbs, R.W
2000 “Emotional reactions to verbal irony”. Discourse Processes 29(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M
2000 “Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach”. Psychological Bulletin 1261: 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiese, M
2014 “How can emotions be both cognitive and bodily?Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 131: 513–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, J
2009 “Pragmatics, propositional and non-propositional effects: Can a theory of utterance interpretation account for emotions in verbal communication?Social Science Information 48(3): 447–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A. and Ochsner, K.N
2007 “The role of social cognition in emotion”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(2): 66–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, M.T. and Simmons, K.B
1995 “Communicating intentions through nonverbal behaviors”. Human Communication Research 22(1): 128–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, H
2003 “Emotions and the problem of other minds”. In A. Hatzimoysis (ed), Philosophy and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, A
2000Poetic Effects. A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piskorska, A
2012 “Cognition and emotions -Jointly contributing to positive cognitive effects?” In A. Piskorska (ed.), Relevance Studies in Poland, Vol. 4. Essays on Language and Communication. Warsaw (Poland): WUW, 102–111.Google Scholar
Planalp, S
1999Communicating Emotion. Social, Moral, and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rostomyan, A
2012 “The vitality of emotional background knowledge in court”. Pólemos 6(2): 281–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D
2010 “Epistemic vigilance”. Mind & Language 25(4): 359–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–318.Google Scholar
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2015 “Beyond speaker’s meaning”. Croatian Journal of Philosophy XV(44): 117–149.Google Scholar
Strey, C
2016The Language of Emotions: An Ostensive-Inferential Study. PhD Thesis. Porto Alegre: PUCRS.Google Scholar
Wharton, T
2009Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, A
2000 “The attitudinal effects of prosody, and how they relate to emotion”. Paper delivered at ISCA Workshop on Speech and Emotion . University of Belfast, September.
Wilson, D
2006 “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?”. Lingua 1161: 1722–1743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Irony and metarepresentation”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 211: 183–226.Google Scholar
2013 “Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 59(A): 40–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D
1992 “On verbal irony”. Lingua 871: 53–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Wharton, T
2005 “Relevance and prosody”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 171: 427–454.Google Scholar
Yus, F
2000a “On reaching the intended ironic interpretation”. International Journal of Communication 10(1–2): 27–78.Google Scholar
2000b “Literal/nonliteral and the processing of verbal irony”. Pragmalingüística 8–91: 349–374.Google Scholar
2009 “Saturación contextual en la comprensión de la ironía”. In L. Ruiz Gurillo and X. Padilla García. Frankfurt (eds), Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres: Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 309–331.Google Scholar
2015a “Should relevance theory analyse what is non-propositional, non-intentional but yet affects the eventual relevance?” Paper delivered at Relevance Round Table Meeting 41. Kraków: Institute of English Studies, Jagiellonian University of Kraków, September.
2015b “The discursive management of the phatic Internet (and how to explain it pragmatically)”. Paper delivered at Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis (ADDA) . Valencia (Spain), November.
2015c “Broadening the (propositional) scope of pragmatics in order to address the (non-propositional) quality of humorous effects”. Paper delivered at I Workshop on Advanced Studies of Humor and Gender (WASHUM) . Alicante (Spain): University of Alicante, November.
2016aHumour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b “Relevance theory and contextual sources-centred analysis of irony. Current research and compatibility”. In M. Padilla Cruz (ed), Relevance Theory: Recent Developments, Current Challenges and Future Directions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 147–171.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

No author info given
2022.  In Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], Crossref logo
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella
2018. Satire as a genre. Pragmatics & Cognition 25:3  pp. 459 ff. Crossref logo
Diez-Arroyo, Marisa
2018. Metarepresentation and echo in online automobile advertising. Lingua 201  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ervas, Francesca
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo
Galera Masegosa, Alicia
2020. The role of echoing in meaning construction and interpretation. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1  pp. 19 ff. Crossref logo
Hess Zimmermann, Karina, Graciela Fernández Ruiz & Andrea Minerva Silva López
2021. ¿Para qué ironizamos? Reflexiones de adolescentes de 12 y 15 años sobre las funciones de la ironía verbal. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 8:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz-Moneva, Maria Angeles
2020.  In Relevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics [Figurative Thought and Language, 8],  pp. 327 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Angeles
2019. Ironie, umor și cultură în How to Be a Brit de George Mikes: perspective teoretice ale relevanței. Diacronia :10 Crossref logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Angeles
2019. Irony, humour and culture in George Mikes’ How to Be a Brit: relevance-theoretical perspectives. Diacronia :10 Crossref logo
Ruiz-Moneva, María Ángeles
2018. Irony and Parody in a Spanish Translation of Fowles’ "The French Lieutenant’s Woman": A Relevance-Theoretical Approach. Complutense Journal of English Studies 26  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
2019. Lawrence N. Berlin, Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer (eds.) The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups . Functions of Language 26:3  pp. 372 ff. Crossref logo
Wharton, Tim, Constant Bonard, Daniel Dukes, David Sander & Steve Oswald
2021. Relevance and emotion. Journal of Pragmatics 181  pp. 259 ff. Crossref logo
Yus, Francisco
2017. Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication. Journal of Pragmatics 114  pp. 66 ff. Crossref logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.