Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp. 259283
References

References

Bezuidenhout, A.
2001 “Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25: 156–186.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blair, H.
1842Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Halifax: William Milner.Google Scholar
Camp, E.
2006 “Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said”. Mind and Language 21(3): 280–309.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Sarcasm, pretense, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction”. Noûs 46: 587–634.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. and Hawthorne, J.
2008 “Sarcastic ‘Like’: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics”. In John Hawthorne (ed), Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–21.Google Scholar
Carston, R. and Wearing, C.
2015 “Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 79: 79–92.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M.
1997Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Claridge, C.
2011Hyperbole in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Colston, H.
1997 “Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism”. Discourse Processes 23: 25–45.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 “On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension”. Pragmatics and Cognition 8(2): 277–324.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. and O’Brien, J.
2000 “Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishment of irony and hyperbole”. Discourse Processes 30(2): 179–199.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creusere, M.
2000 “A developmental test of theoretical perspectives on the understanding of verbal irony: Children’s recognition of allusion and pragmatic insincerity”. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 29–45.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, M.
2011 “A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception”. International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Irony from a neo–Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature”. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(3): 403–431.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “When does irony tickle the hearer? Towards capturing the characteristics of humorous irony”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour Across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 289–320.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: On lying, deception, irony and metaphor”. Pragmatics & Cognition 23 (1): 174–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness”. Corpus Pragmatics 1: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, L.
1990 “Between emphasis and exaggeration: Verbal emphasis in the English of Cape Breton Island”. In J. Black (ed), Papers from the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. St John’s Memorial: University of Newfoundland, 39–49.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R.
1988Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Garmendia, J.
2010 “Irony is critical”. Pragmatics and Cognition 18: 397–421.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “She’s (not) a fine friend: ‘Saying’ and criticism in irony”. Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 41–65.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The clash: Humor and critical attitude in verbal irony”. Humor 27: 641–659.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.
1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
1999The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
2000 “Irony in talk among friends”. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 5–27.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. and O’Brien, J.
1991 “Psychological aspects of irony understanding”. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 523–530.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989a “Logic and conversation”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 22–40. [Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58; Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In D. Davison and G. Harman (eds), The Logic of Grammar. Dickenson: Encino, 64–75.]Google Scholar
1989b “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 41–57. [Grice, Herbert Paul. 1978. “Further notes on logic and conversation”. In P. Cole (ed), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 113–127.]Google Scholar
Hamamoto, H.
1998 “Irony from a cognitive perspective”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–270.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, H.
1990 “A speech-act analysis of irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L.
1989The Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Israel, M.
2006 “Saying less and meaning less”. In B. Birner and G. Ward (eds), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–162.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Kapogianni, E.
2011 “Irony via ‘surrealism’”. In M. Dynel (ed), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–68.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction: A Typological Approach with Focus on Ironic Implicature Strength. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2014 “Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse: (mis)interpretation and irony blindness”. Humor 27: 597–618.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Glucksberg, S.
1989 “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118(4): 374–386.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R.
1995 “Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 21–31.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M.
1995 “How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124: 3–21.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H., Orton, D and Anderson, D.
1998Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. A Foundation for Literary Study. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C.
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Livnat, Z.
2004 “On verbal irony, meta-linguistic knowledge and echoic interpretation”. Pragmatics & Cognition 12(5): 7–70.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Quantity, truthfulness and ironic effect”. Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. and Carter, R.
2004 “ ‘There’s millions of them’: Hyperbole in everyday conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 149–184.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nemesi, A.
2010 “Data-gathering methods in research on hyperbole production and interpretation”. In E.T. Nemeth and K. Bibok (eds), The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 381–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, L.
2016 “On the relation of irony, understatement, and litotes”. Pragmatics & Cognition.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
2004 “Hyperbole, extreme case formulations”. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1727–1739.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A.
2006The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007 “Irony and the reversal of evaluation”. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P., Ferretti, T. and Katz, A.
2000 “Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony”. Discourse Processes 29: 201–222.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.
1986 “Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims”. Human Studies 9: 219–229.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popa, M.
2009Figuring the Code: Pragmatic Routes to the Non-literal. PhD Dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
2010 “Ironic metaphor interpretation”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 33: 1–17.Google Scholar
Preminger, A.
(ed) 1974Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. and Kreuz, R.
1994 “Why do people use figurative language?Psychological Science 5: 159–163.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seto, K.
1998 “On non-echoic irony”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 240–255.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.
1657Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail’d. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
1981 “Irony and the use-mention distinction”. In P. Cole (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–313.Google Scholar
1998 “Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto, and Yamanashi”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283–293.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spitzbardt, H.
1965 “English adverbs of degree and their semantic fields”. Philologica Pragensia 8: 349–359.Google Scholar
Stern, J.
2000Metaphor in Context. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Utsumi, A.
2000 “Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony”. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, J.
2003 “Truthfulness”. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–48.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Walton, K.
2015 “Meiosis, hyperbole, irony”. Philosophical Studies, 1–16.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.
1995 “Is there a maxim of truthfulness?UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.Google Scholar
2006 “The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence?Lingua 116: 1722–1743.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D.
1992 “On verbal irony”. Lingua 87: 53–76.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 [2002, 2012] “Truthfulness and relevance”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. “Truthfulness and relevance”. Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and relevance”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–83]Google Scholar
2012 “Explaining irony”. In D. Wilson and D. Sperber (eds), Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–145.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamanashi, M.
1998 “Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes”. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 271–281.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2  pp. 262 ff. Crossref logo
Barnden, John
2021.  In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1  pp. 174 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2017.  In Implicitness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 276],  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. Academics vs. American scriptwriters vs. academics: A battle over the etic and emic “sarcasm” and “irony” labels. Language & Communication 55  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2017. The Irony of Irony: Irony Based on Truthfulness. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2018.  In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2018. Irony in Language Use and Communication. Journal of Pragmatics 135  pp. 4 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2019. Ironic intentions in action and interaction. Language Sciences 75  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2  pp. 555 ff. Crossref logo
Dynel, Marta & Fabio IM Poppi
2018. In tragoedia risus: Analysis of dark humour in post-terrorist attack discourse. Discourse & Communication 12:4  pp. 382 ff. Crossref logo
Livnat, Zohar
2020.  In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Sullivan, Arthur
2019. The varieties of verbal irony: a new neo-Gricean taxonomy. Lingua 232  pp. 102740 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.