Article published in:
Controversies, Communication and the Body
Edited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 404415
References

References

Amel, R.
1999Doxastic dialectics. The persuasive truth. In Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, XLIV, 1-4 (pp. 3–12). Bucharest: Editura Academiei.Google Scholar
2008Sign systems - Sign references. Semiotica 32(1-2). 59–68.Google Scholar
2009To use signs vs. to invent signs. In Eero Tarasti (ed.), Communication: Understanding/misunderstanding. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the IASS/AIS – Helsinki-Imatra, 11-17 June, 2007, vol. I, 33–43. Tartu: Greif.Google Scholar
2011The probable and the problem. In F.H. van Eemeren & Alias (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference ISSA, June 29-July 2, 2010. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
2013 Listening and the well-tempered controversy (With reference to intercultural exchange). XXII World Congress of Philosophy (International Association for the Study of Controversies), 4-10 August 2013, Athens.
2016 Petitio Principii (With reference to doxastic/belief dialectics) [comunication, International Conference IASC “Paradoxes of conflicts, 2/4. XII, 2014”, Lecce]. In G. Scarafile & Leah Gruenpeter Gold (eds.), Paradoxes of Conflicts, vol. 12, 207–218. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, St
2001Subjectivity: Locating the first-person in Being and Time . Inquiry 44. 433–454. Taylor & Francis Online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eliade, M.
1987The sacred and the profane. The Nature of Religion (trans.from French by Willard R.Trask). New York: The Harvest Book, Harcourt (Internet Arhive).Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1991The conception of value. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M.
1957Der Satz vom Grund. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
1967Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Levinas, E.
1979Totality and infinity. An Essay on Exteriority (trans. from French by Alphonso Lingis). The Hague: Martinus Nijhof Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar