Article published In:
Controversies, Communication and the BodyEdited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 486–499
Edited by Joseph Lehmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 23:3] 2016
► pp. 486–499
Controversies on Body
Brief Remarks on the nexus between the Ethics of Communication and the Altruistic Convenience in the doctor–patient relationship
My paper is related to applied ethics with special reference to the ethics of communication. The task of this discipline is to defend otherness in the various contexts where it exists. The departure point for my paper is the observation that the physician–patient relationship, instead of being the place of therapeutic alliance, is increasingly becoming a source of conflict, as is shown by the statistics on legal actions between doctors and patients, lack of communication skills identified amongst patients, and cases of burnout amongst doctors. This situation calls on ethics to take two steps simultaneously. Firstly, it must not forego the duty of indicating the rules. Secondly, it must be capable of suggesting directions where those same rules can be applied. Succeeding in this task is decisive not only in domains where the ethical approach may be welcomed, but also for ethics as such, otherwise destined to be a disembodied specialization.
References (17)
Bodenheimer, T. & C. Sinsky. 2014. From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annals of Family Medicine 12(6). 573–576. 
Boella, L. 2006. Sentire l’altro. Conoscere e praticare l’empatia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore
Botto, E. 1973. Intellettuali, comunismo e dialettica dei valori e dei bisogni in Dionys Mascolo. Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 651. 771–793.
Buber, M. 1947. I and Thou. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Dascal, M. 1996. Types of polemics and types of polemical moves. In S. Cmejrkova, J. Hoffmannova, O. Mullerova, & J. Svetla (eds.), Dialogue Analysis VI (Proceedings of the 6th Conference, Prague 1996), vol. 11, 15–33. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer. Available online: [URL]
Fabris, A. 2009. Dalla deontologia all’etica della comunicazione. Teoria XXIX/1(Terza serie IV/1). 7–18.
Gawande, A. 2011. The Checklist Manifesto: How to get things right. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Grill, C., G. Ahlborg Jr. & E. Wikström. 2014. Health care managers learning by listening to subordinates’ dialogue training. Journal of Health Organization and Management 28(3). 437–454.
Kessels, R.P.C. 2003. Patients’ memory for medical information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 961. 219–222.
Langewitz, W. et al. 2012. Spontaneous talking time at start of consultation in outpatient clinic: Cohort study. British Medical Journal 3251. 682–683.
Leibniz, G.W. 2006. The art of controversies. Translated and Edited, with an Introductory Essay and Notes by M. Dascal with Q. Racionero and A. Cardoso. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ley, P. 1979. Memory for medical information. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 181. 245–55.
Marsh, H. 2014. Do no harm: Stories of life, death and brain surgery. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Melnick, E.R. 2016. Empathy in the time of burn-out. Mayo Clinical Proceedings XXX1. 1–2.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2002. Phenomenology of perception. London-New York: Routledge.
Reid, J.R., et al. 2010. The group health medical home at year two: Cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burn-out for providers. Health Affairs 29(5). 835–843.
Scott, J.G., et al. 2009. Healing relationship and the existential philosophy of Martin Buber. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 41. 4–11.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Scarafile, Giovanni
2020. Chapter 12. The pointer finger and the pilgrim shell. In Controversies and Interdisciplinarity [Controversies, 16], ► pp. 235 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.