Controlled elicitation of linguistic and psycholinguistic experimental data facilitate strong inferences about phonological, syntactic, semantic and pragmatic structures and functions, yet neglect the ecological validity of responses. Ecological validity in this paper refers to whether data gathered under controlled conditions are commensurate with routine problem solving and language use in natural settings. All methods produce "white room" effects that compromise data gathering and analysis. Unexamined folk knowledge and experiences also guide the investigator s interpretation of data from field research, laboratories, testing sessions, and target sentences. Story recall data from children in a combined second-third grade classroom and their narrative responses to cartoons without sound are used to illustrate ecological validity issues. The child's spontaneous, imaginative narratives about the story and cartoons resemble adult folk theory, and their semantic content reveal sociocultural knowledge essential for understanding subjects ' reasoning and information processing skills.
2007. Introduction: Aaron V. Cicourel and the emergence of critical perspectives on social scientific inquiry. Text & Talk 27:5-6
Böttger, Andreas & Rainer Strobl
2002. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen qualitativer Erhebungs-und Auswertungsverfahren in der Gewaltforschung. In Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung, ► pp. 1483 ff.
Böttger, Andreas & Rainer Strobl
2003. Potentials and Limits of Qualitative Methods for Research on Violence. In International Handbook of Violence Research, ► pp. 1203 ff.
Candlin, Christopher N., Jonathan Crichton & Stephen H. Moore
2017. What Next?. In Exploring Discourse in Context and in Action, ► pp. 239 ff.
Candlin, Christopher N., Jonathan Crichton & Stephen H. Moore
2017. How Do You Know That?. In Exploring Discourse in Context and in Action, ► pp. 129 ff.
Cicourel, Aaron V
2007. A personal, retrospective view of ecological validity. Text & Talk 27:5-6
Cicourel, Aaron V.
2005. Word Meaning and Ecological Validity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
2014. Plurilithic and Ecological Perspectives on English: Some Conceptual and Practical Implications. In Dynamic Ecologies [Multilingual Education, 9], ► pp. 31 ff.
Denora, Tia
2013. ‘‘Time after time’’: A Quali-T method for assessing music's impact on well-being. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 8:1 ► pp. 20611 ff.
DeNora, Tia & Gary Ansdell
2017. Music in action: tinkering, testing and tracing over time. Qualitative Research 17:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Gobo, Giampietro
2008. Crafting Blindness: Its Organizational Construction in a First Grade School. Qualitative Sociology Review 4:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Gobo, Giampietro
2009. Wytwarzanie ślepoty i jej organizacyjne konstruowanie w szkole podstawowej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 5:2 ► pp. 118 ff.
Gobo, Giampietro
2021. Replicability. Politics and Poetics of Accountability, Validation and Legitimation. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Gobo, Giampietro
2021. Limiti dell'"approccio pragmatico" e insidie della metodologia bricolage. I metodi misti rischiano di riprodurre un'epistemologia positivista sotto mentite spoglie?. RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione :76 ► pp. 71 ff.
Knappertsbusch, Felix
2017. Ökologische Validität durch Mixed-Methods-Designs. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 69:S2 ► pp. 337 ff.
Kwon, Winston, Ian Clarke & Ruth Wodak
2009. Organizational decision-making, discourse, and power: integrating across contexts and scales. Discourse & Communication 3:3 ► pp. 273 ff.
Lezaun, Javier
2007. A Market of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups. The Sociological Review 55:2_suppl ► pp. 130 ff.
Milne, Richard, Alessia Costa & Natassia Brenman
2022. Digital phenotyping and the (data) shadow of Alzheimer's disease. Big Data & Society 9:1 ► pp. 205395172110707 ff.
Newson, Martha, Michael Buhrmester, Dimitris Xygalatas & Harvey Whitehouse
2021. Go WILD, Not WEIRD. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 6:1-2
NORBURY, COURTENAY FRAZIER, TRACEY GEMMELL & RHEA PAUL
2014. Pragmatics abilities in narrative production: a cross-disorder comparison. Journal of Child Language 41:3 ► pp. 485 ff.
Pentimalli, Barbara & Giampietro Gobo
2023. “Hearing with the eyes” visual hearing in (a trio) music rehearsals. The Senses and Society 18:3 ► pp. 254 ff.
Pfeiffer, Sabine
2018. Die Quantifizierung von Nicht-Routine. Arbeit 27:3 ► pp. 213 ff.
Pinto, Giuliana, Christian Tarchi & Lucia Bigozzi
2019. Promoting narrative competence in kindergarten: An intervention study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 47 ► pp. 20 ff.
Pérez-Milans, Miguel
2023. (Un)doing regimentation in reflexive practices: on-site processes of sociolinguistic differentiation – a commentary. Multilingua 42:6 ► pp. 897 ff.
Riazi, A. Mehdi & Christopher N. Candlin
2014. Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching 47:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Sarangi, Srikant
2007. Editorial: The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst's paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk 27:5-6
Skar, Gustaf B., Ragnar Thygesen & Lars Sigfred Evensen
2017. Assessment for Learning and Standards: A Norwegian Strategy and Its Challenges. In Standard Setting in Education [Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, ], ► pp. 225 ff.
Tommerdahl, Jodi & Cynthia Kilpatrick
2013. Analysing frequency and temporal reliability of children’s morphosyntactic production in spontaneous language samples of varying lengths. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 29:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Whitehead, David
2007. Literacy Assessment Practices: Moving from Standardised to Ecologically Valid Assessments in Secondary Schools. Language and Education 21:5 ► pp. 434 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.