Article published in:
Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 7:1 (1999) ► pp. 3563
Cited by

Cited by 49 other publications

Alcaraz Carrión, Daniel & Javier Valenzuela
2021. Distant time, distant gesture: speech and gesture correlate to express temporal distance. Semiotica 2021:241  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Alibali, Martha W. & Autumn B. Hostetter
2010. Mimicry and simulation in gesture comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:6  pp. 433 ff. Crossref logo
Andrén, Mats
2014. Multimodal constructions in children. Gesture 14:2  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Beattie, Geoffrey, Kate Webster & Jamie Ross
2010. The Fixation and Processing of the Iconic Gestures That Accompany Talk. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29:2  pp. 194 ff. Crossref logo
Becvar, Amaya, James Hollan & Edwin Hutchins
2008.  In Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts [Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ],  pp. 117 ff. Crossref logo
Chafai, Nicolas Ech, Catherine Pelachaud, Danielle Pelé & Gaspard Breton
2006.  In Intelligent Virtual Agents [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4133],  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Chafai, Nicolas Ech, Catherine Pelachaud & Danielle Pelé
2007. A case study of gesture expressivity breaks. Language Resources and Evaluation 41:3-4  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo
De Filippo, Carol Lee & Charissa R. Lansing
2006. Eye Fixations of Deaf and Hearing Observers in Simultaneous Communication Perception. Ear & Hearing 27:4  pp. 331 ff. Crossref logo
Debreslioska, Sandra, Joost van de Weijer & Marianne Gullberg
2019. Addressees Are Sensitive to the Presence of Gesture When Tracking a Single Referent in Discourse. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Dewhurst, Richard, Marcus Nyström, Halszka Jarodzka, Tom Foulsham, Roger Johansson & Kenneth Holmqvist
2012. It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach. Behavior Research Methods 44:4  pp. 1079 ff. Crossref logo
Drijvers, Linda, Ole Jensen & Eelke Spaak
2021. Rapid invisible frequency tagging reveals nonlinear integration of auditory and visual information. Human Brain Mapping 42:4  pp. 1138 ff. Crossref logo
Drijvers, Linda, Julija Vaitonytė & Asli Özyürek
2019. Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension. Cognitive Science 43:10 Crossref logo
Eggenberger, Noëmi, Basil C. Preisig, Rahel Schumacher, Simone Hopfner, Tim Vanbellingen, Thomas Nyffeler, Klemens Gutbrod, Jean-Marie Annoni, Stephan Bohlhalter, Dario Cazzoli, René M. Müri & Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells
2016. Comprehension of Co-Speech Gestures in Aphasic Patients: An Eye Movement Study. PLOS ONE 11:1  pp. e0146583 ff. Crossref logo
Fedorova, O.V. & I.Yu. Zherdev
2019. Follow the hands of the interlocutor! (on strategies for the distribution of visual attention). Experimental Psychology (Russia) 12:1  pp. 98 ff. Crossref logo
Fussell, Susan R., Leslie D. Setlock, Jie Yang, Jiazhi Ou, Elizabeth Mauer & Adam D. I. Kramer
2004. Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks. Human–Computer Interaction 19:3  pp. 273 ff. Crossref logo
Gullberg, Marianne
2003.  In The Mind's Eye,  pp. 685 ff. Crossref logo
Gullberg, Marianne & Kenneth Holmqvist
2002.  In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2298],  pp. 206 ff. Crossref logo
Gullberg, Marianne & Sotaro Kita
2009. Attention to Speech-Accompanying Gestures: Eye Movements and Information Uptake. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 33:4  pp. 251 ff. Crossref logo
Gurney, Pine & Wiseman
2013. The Gestural Misinformation Effect: Skewing Eyewitness Testimony Through Gesture. The American Journal of Psychology 126:3  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Gurney, Daniel J., Louise R. Ellis & Emily Vardon-Hynard
2016. The saliency of gestural misinformation in the perception of a violent crime. Psychology, Crime & Law 22:7  pp. 651 ff. Crossref logo
Hessels, Roy S.
2020. How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27:5  pp. 856 ff. Crossref logo
Hewig, Johannes, Ralf H. Trippe, Holger Hecht, Thomas Straube & Wolfgang H. R. Miltner
2008. Gender Differences for Specific Body Regions When Looking at Men and Women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 32:2  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Holler, Judith & Katie Wilkin
2011. An experimental investigation of how addressee feedback affects co-speech gestures accompanying speakers’ responses. Journal of Pragmatics 43:14  pp. 3522 ff. Crossref logo
Jokinen, Kristiina, Hirohisa Furukawa, Masafumi Nishida & Seiichi Yamamoto
2013. Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 3:2  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kamiya, Nobuhiro
2018. The effect of learner age on the interpretation of the nonverbal behaviors of teachers and other students in identifying questions in the L2 classroom. Language Teaching Research 22:1  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Kamiya, Nobuhiro
2019. What Factors Affect Learners’ Ability to Interpret Nonverbal Behaviors in EFL Classrooms?. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 43:3  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Kovářová, Dominika
2015. Kinezika ve výuce cizím jazykům: přehledová studie. Pedagogická orientace 25:3  pp. 413 ff. Crossref logo
Kuhlen, Anna K., Alexia Galati & Susan E. Brennano
2012. Gesturing integrates top-down and bottom-up information: Joint effects of speakers' expectations and addressees' feedback. Language and Cognition 4:1  pp. 17 ff. Crossref logo
Lazaraton, Anne
2004. Gesture and Speech in the Vocabulary Explanations of One ESL Teacher: A Microanalytic Inquiry. Language Learning 54:1  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Mastrantuono, Eliana, Michele Burigo, Isabel R. Rodríguez-Ortiz & David Saldaña
2019. The Role of Multiple Articulatory Channels of Sign-Supported Speech Revealed by Visual Processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:6  pp. 1625 ff. Crossref logo
Mastrantuono, Eliana, David Saldaña & Isabel R. Rodríguez-Ortiz
2017. An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
McDonough, Kim, Dustin Crowther, Paula Kielstra & Pavel Trofimovich
2015. Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts. Second Language Research 31:4  pp. 563 ff. Crossref logo
McDonough, Kim, Pavel Trofimovich, Libing Lu & Dato Abashidze
2019. THE OCCURRENCE AND PERCEPTION OF LISTENER VISUAL CUES DURING NONUNDERSTANDING EPISODES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:5  pp. 1151 ff. Crossref logo
Preisig, Basil C., Noëmi Eggenberger, Dario Cazzoli, Thomas Nyffeler, Klemens Gutbrod, Jean-Marie Annoni, Jurka R. Meichtry, Tobias Nef & René M. Müri
2018. Multimodal Communication in Aphasia: Perception and Production of Co-speech Gestures During Face-to-Face Conversation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12 Crossref logo
Preisig, Basil C., Noëmi Eggenberger, Giuseppe Zito, Tim Vanbellingen, Rahel Schumacher, Simone Hopfner, Thomas Nyffeler, Klemens Gutbrod, Jean-Marie Annoni, Stephan Bohlhalter & René M. Müri
2015. Perception of co-speech gestures in aphasic patients: A visual exploration study during the observation of dyadic conversations. Cortex 64  pp. 157 ff. Crossref logo
Rasmussen, Gitte & Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen
2021. The sociality of minimizing involvement in self-service shops in Denmark: Customers’ multi-modal practices of being, getting, and staying out of the way. Discourse & Communication  pp. 175048132110436 ff. Crossref logo
Rowbotham, Samantha, Donna M. Lloyd, Judith Holler & Alison Wearden
2015. Externalizing the Private Experience of Pain: A Role for Co-Speech Gestures in Pain Communication?. Health Communication 30:1  pp. 70 ff. Crossref logo
Salem, Maha, Katharina Rohlfing, Stefan Kopp & Frank Joublin
2011.  In 2011 RO-MAN,  pp. 247 ff. Crossref logo
Salminen-Saari, Jessica F. A., Enrique Garcia Moreno-Esteva, Eeva Haataja, Miika Toivanen, Markku S. Hannula & Anu Laine
2021. Phases of collaborative mathematical problem solving and joint attention: a case study utilizing mobile gaze tracking. ZDM – Mathematics Education 53:4  pp. 771 ff. Crossref logo
Saunders, Emily & David Quinto-Pozos
2021. Comprehension benefits of visual-gestural iconicity and spatial referencing. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832110376 ff. Crossref logo
THOMPSON, ROBIN L., KAREN EMMOREY & ROBERT KLUENDER
2009. Learning to look: The acquisition of eye gaze agreement during the production of ASL verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12:4  pp. 393 ff. Crossref logo
Treffner, Paul, Mira Peter & Mark Kleidon
2008. Gestures and Phases: The Dynamics of Speech-Hand Communication. Ecological Psychology 20:1  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Tsui, Katherine M. & Holly A. Yanco
2013. Design Challenges and Guidelines for Social Interaction Using Mobile Telepresence Robots. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics 9:1  pp. 227 ff. Crossref logo
Valtakari, Niilo V., Ignace T. C. Hooge, Charlotte Viktorsson, Pär Nyström, Terje Falck-Ytter & Roy S. Hessels
2021. Eye tracking in human interaction: Possibilities and limitations. Behavior Research Methods 53:4  pp. 1592 ff. Crossref logo
Vanbellingen, Tim, Rahel Schumacher, Noëmi Eggenberger, Simone Hopfner, Dario Cazzoli, Basil C. Preisig, Manuel Bertschi, Thomas Nyffeler, Klemens Gutbrod, Claudio L. Bassetti, Stephan Bohlhalter & René M. Müri
2015. Different visual exploration of tool-related gestures in left hemisphere brain damaged patients is associated with poor gestural imitation. Neuropsychologia 71  pp. 158 ff. Crossref logo
Wessler, Janet & Jochim Hansen
2017. Temporal Closeness Promotes Imitation of Meaningful Gestures in Face-to-Face Communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 41:4  pp. 415 ff. Crossref logo
Yücel, Zeynep, Francesco Zanlungo & Masahiro Shiomi
2017.  In Social Robotics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10652],  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo
Zülch, Gert & Sascha Stowasser
2003.  In The Mind's Eye,  pp. 531 ff. Crossref logo
Özer, Demet & Tilbe Göksun
2020. Gesture Use and Processing: A Review on Individual Differences in Cognitive Resources. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.