Article published In:
Facial Information Processing: A multidisciplinary perspectiveItiel E. Dror and Sarah V. Stevenage
[Pragmatics & Cognition 8:1] 2000
► pp. 83–105
Itiel E. Dror and Sarah V. Stevenage
[Pragmatics & Cognition 8:1] 2000
► pp. 83–105
Exploring the relations between categorization and decision making with regard to realistic face stimuli
Categorization and decision making are combined in a task with photorealistic faces. Two different types of face stimuli were assigned probabilistically into one of two fictitious groups; based on the category, faces were further probabilistically assigned to be hostile or friendly. In Part I, participants are asked to categorize a face into one of two categories, and to make a decision concerning interaction. A Markov model of categorization followed by decision making provides reasonable fits to Part I data. A Markov model predicting decision making followed by categorization is rejected. In Part II, a no-parameter model predicts decisions using categorization and decision responses collected in separate trials, suggesting that Part 1 results are not an artifact of the presentation of categorization and decision questions within a single trial. Decisions concerning interaction (defensive/friendly) appear to be based on information from the category decision, and not from the face stimuli alone.
Cited by
Cited by 29 other publications
Busemeyer, Jerome R, Zheng Wang, Andrei Khrennikov & Irina Basieva
2014. Applying quantum principles to psychology. Physica Scripta T163 ► pp. 014007 ff. 
Busemeyer, Jerome R., Peter D. Kvam & Timothy J. Pleskac
2020. Comparison of Markov versus quantum dynamical models of human decision making. WIREs Cognitive Science 11:4
Busemeyer, Jerome R., Zheng Wang & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky
2009. Empirical comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53:5 ► pp. 423 ff.
Chen, Luyuan & Yong Deng
2022. An improved evidential Markov decision making model. Applied Intelligence 52:7 ► pp. 8008 ff.
Dai, Jiongyu & Yong Deng
2020. A new method to predict the interference effect in quantum-like Bayesian networks. Soft Computing 24:14 ► pp. 10287 ff.
Di Nunzio, Giorgio Maria, Peter Bruza & Laurianne Sitbon
2014. Interference in Text Categorisation Experiments. In Quantum Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8369], ► pp. 22 ff.
2014. Interference in Text Categorisation Experiments. In Quantum Interaction [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8369], ► pp. 22 ff.
Gao, Xiaozhuan & Yong Deng
2023. Inferable dynamic Markov model to predict interference effects. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 117 ► pp. 105512 ff.
Gao, Xiaozhuan, Lipeng Pan, Danilo Pelusi & Yong Deng
2023. Fuzzy Markov Decision-Making Model for Interference Effects. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 31:1 ► pp. 199 ff.
He, Zichang & Wen Jiang
2018. An evidential dynamical model to predict the interference effect of categorization on decision making results. Knowledge-Based Systems 150 ► pp. 139 ff.
2018. An evidential Markov decision making model. Information Sciences 467 ► pp. 357 ff.
Jiang, Jing & Xinwang Liu
2022. A quantum cognition based group decision making model considering interference effects in consensus reaching process. Computers & Industrial Engineering 173 ► pp. 108705 ff.
Khrennikov, Andrei
2015. Quantum-like modeling of cognition. Frontiers in Physics 3
Moreira, Catarina & Andreas Wichert
2017. Exploring the relations between Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks and decision-making tasks with regard to face stimuli. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 78 ► pp. 86 ff.
Mukherjee, Kaushiki & Urbi Mukherjee
2021. Theoretical framework underlying contextual system of measurements in cognitive domain. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 104 ► pp. 102598 ff.
Pan, Lipeng & Xiaozhuan Gao
2023. Evidential Markov decision-making model based on belief entropy to predict interference effects. Information Sciences 633 ► pp. 10 ff.
Pothos, Emmanuel M. & Jerome R. Busemeyer
2013. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
2022. Quantum Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 73:1 ► pp. 749 ff.
Pothos, Emmanuel M., Oliver J. Waddup, Prince Kouassi & James M. Yearsley
2021. What Is Rational and Irrational in Human Decision Making. Quantum Reports 3:1 ► pp. 242 ff.
Roy, Sisir
2016. New Empirical Evidences on Decision Making and Cognition. In Decision Making and Modelling in Cognitive Science, ► pp. 75 ff.
Shan, Zu-Hua
2022. Brainwave Phase Stability: Predictive Modeling of Irrational Decision. Frontiers in Psychology 13
She, Lulu, Shilian Han & Xinwang Liu
2021. Application of quantum-like Bayesian network and belief entropy for interference effect in multi-attribute decision making problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 157 ► pp. 107307 ff.
Wang, Benyou, Peng Zhang, Jingfei Li, Dawei Song, Yuexian Hou & Zhenguo Shang
2016. Exploration of Quantum Interference in Document Relevance Judgement Discrepancy. Entropy 18:4 ► pp. 144 ff.
Wang, Zheng & Jerome R. Busemeyer
2016. Interference effects of categorization on decision making. Cognition 150 ► pp. 133 ff.
Xiao, Fuyuan
2022. CEQD: A Complex Mass Function to Predict Interference Effects. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 52:8 ► pp. 7402 ff.
XIN, Xiaoyang, Ying LI, Yanling BI & Bihua YAN
2019. Quantum decision-making model based on equate-to-differentiate method: Explanation for the disjunction effect in prisoner’s dilemma. Acta Psychologica Sinica 51:6 ► pp. 724 ff.
XIN, Xiaoyang, Chenhong XU, Hongyu CHEN & Ying LI
2018. 一种新决策模型——量子决策模型. Advances in Psychological Science 26:8 ► pp. 1365 ff.
Yu, Jiangbo Gabriel & R. Jayakrishnan
2018. A quantum cognition model for bridging stated and revealed preference. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 118 ► pp. 263 ff.
Zheng, Rong, Jerome R. Busemeyer & Robert M. Nosofsky
2023. Integrating Categorization and Decision‐Making. Cognitive Science 47:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.