Cover not available
Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 2:2 (2021) ► pp.153–174

Students’ errors in L1 Spanish grammar from the perspective of formal linguistics

ORCID logo | University of Murcia
This paper studies the role that knowledge about formal linguistics can play in teacher education. In order to do so, this contribution focuses on specific secondary students’ errors and misconceptions when confronted with L1 explicit grammar instruction. Errors are measured with respect to a formal theory of grammar. The rationale for developing this research is that certain aspects of formal theories, such as constituency, recursion, dependency and compositionality function not only are the building blocks of the utterances, but are also needed for speech processing. If this is the case, acquiring them correctly might be helpful for enhancing literacy, since the very same notions are at the core of both the construction and the understanding of any text. As a second issue, the present paper addresses the question of how the absence of such knowledge models the perspective from which students’ errors are evaluated by the teachers. Errors are described following the theories for analyzing errors in mathematics. A side effect of this approach is that the parallelism between errors made in learning mathematics and in learning the grammatical concepts just mentioned allows broadening the perspective from which the latter is approached.
Keywords: formal grammar, L1 grammar, school grammar, errors, functional grammar, literacy, mathematics, communicative approaches, Spanish, linearity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Formal vs. function-oriented L1 grammars
  • 3.Theoretical framework. Students’ errors in mathematics
  • 4.Students’ errors and misconceptions in L1 grammar
    • 4.1Methodology
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
      • A. Language is linear
      • B. Language is identified with the object it refers to
    • 4.4Further implications
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.21004.bra
References (58)
References
Abrate, R., Pochulu, M., & Vargas, J. (2006). Errores y dificultades en matemáticas. Análisis de causas y sugerencias de trabajo. Buenos Aires: Universidad Nacional de Villa María.Google Scholar
Adger, C. T., Snow, C. E., & Christian, D. (2003). What teachers need to know about language. Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.: Delta Systems Inc., McHenry, IL.Google Scholar
Alderson, Ch. & Hudson, R. (2013). The metalinguistic knowledge of undergraduate students of English language or linguistics. Language Awareness, 22(4), 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. (2010). Teaching Sentence-Level Grammar for Writing: The Evidence so far. In T. Locke. (Ed.), Beyond the Grammar Wars. A Resource for Teachers and Students on developing Language Knowledge in the English/Literacy Classroom (pp. 91–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2019). Language and the brain. Science, 366(6461), 13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. (1994). Repaso de sintaxis tradicional. Madrid: Arco / Libros.Google Scholar
(2018). ¿Qué debemos cambiar en la enseñanza de la gramática?. Revista de Gramática Orientada a las Competencias, 11, 11–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. & Gallego, A. (2016). La aplicación de la gramática en el aula. Recursos didácticos clásicos y modernos para la enseñanza de la gramática. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 54(2), 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). La gramática en la Enseñanza Media. Competencias oficiales y competencias necesarias. Revista de Gramática Orientada a las Competencias, 11, pp. 141–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). La terminología gramatical en Secundaria y Bachillerato. Ventajas e inconvenientes didácticos de algunos conceptos gramaticales antiguos y modernos. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, (in press).Google Scholar
Bravo, A. (2018). La formación de los futuros docentes de Lengua Castellana: el lugar de la gramática en los planes de estudios universitarios. Revista de Gramática Orientada a las Competencias, 11, 37–77. [URL]
Corbett, G. (1979). The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The Significance of Learners Errors. IRAL, 41, 161–170.Google Scholar
Crovitz, D. (2011). Sudden possibilities: Porpoises, eggcorns, and error. English Journal, 100(4), 31–38.Google Scholar
Del Teso, E. (1998). La reflexión sobre la lengua en el bachillerato, Textos, 151, 45–59.Google Scholar
Denham, K. & Lobeck, A. (Eds.). (2005). Language in the Schools: Integrating Linguistic Knowledge into K-12 Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2010). Linguistics at School: Language Awareness in Primary and Secondary Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, P. & Lindblom, K. (2005). Developing Savvy Writers by Analyzing Grammar Rants. In K. Denham & A. Lobeck. (Eds.),191–203.Google Scholar
Fontich, X. & García-Folgado, M. J. (2018). Grammar instruction in the Hispanic area: The case of Spain with attention to empirical studies on metalinguistic activity. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 181, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontich, X., Van Rijt, J., & Gauvin, I. (2020). Intro to the Special Issue Research on L1 grammar in schooling: Mediation at the heart of learning grammar. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 201, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Suárez, J. (2010). Análisis de errores y dificultades en la resolución de tareas algebraicas por alumnos de primer ingreso en nivel licenciatura. Master’s Thesis. Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática, Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Hartwell, P. (1985). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 471, 105–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hines, P. J. & Stern, P. (2019). More than a tool for communication. Science, 366 (6461), 48–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. (1990). Literature and Cognition. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Honda, M. & O’Neil, W. (2017). On thinking linguistically. Revista Linguística / Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 131, 52–65.Google Scholar
Horsten, L. (2019). Philosophy of Mathematics. In Edward, N. Z. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [URL]
Hudson, R. (2004). Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics, 401, 105–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). How linguistics has influenced schools in England. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(4), 227–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Towards a pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 8–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izquierdo Zaragoza, S. (2013). La gramática en las aulas: de la rutina a la reflexión. Análisis crítico de la enseñanza gramatical tradicional. Master’s Thesis. Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Murcia. Accessible in [URL]
Jespersen, O. (1933). Essentials of English Grammar. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Larson, R. (2010). Grammar as Science. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2018). Aprovechar la gramática para mejorar la redacción: los sujetos tácitos. Revista de Gramática Orientada a las Competencias, 11, 237–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, A. (2005). A critical approach to standard English. In K. Denham y A. Lobeck. (eds.), (pp. 97–108).Google Scholar
Luneta, K. (2015). Understanding students’ misconceptions: An analysis of final Grade 12 examination questions in geometry. Pythagoras, 36(1), Art. #261, 11 pages. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milian, M. (2014). Working in grammar at school. In T. Ribas, X. Fontich, & O. Guasch. (Eds.), Grammar at school. Research on metalinguistic activity in language education (pp. 43–73). Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Myhill, D. (2000). Misconceptions and difficulties in the acquisition of metalinguistic knowledge. Language and Education, 14(3), 151–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Linguistic development in children’s writing: changing classroom pedagogies. In D. Kristin & A. Lobeck. (Eds.), (pp. 106–122). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radatz, H. (1979). Error analysis in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 101, 163–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1980). Students’ errors in the mathematical learning process: A survey. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11, 6–10.Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE (=Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española) (2018). Glosario de términos gramaticales. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Rico, L. (1995). Errores y dificultades en el aprendizaje de las Matemáticas. In J. Kilpatrik, P. Gómez, & L. Rico. (Eds.), Educación Matemática. Errores y dificultades de los estudiantes. Resolución de problemas. Evaluación. Historia (pp. 69–108). Méjico: Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.Google Scholar
Rosnick, P., & Clement, J. (1979). Learning without understanding: The effect of tutoring strategies on algebra misconceptions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 3–27.Google Scholar
Ruano, R. M., Socas, M. M., & Palarea, M. (2008). Análisis y clasificación de errores cometidos por alumnos de secundaria en los procesos de sustitución formal, generalización y modelización en álgebra. PNA, 2(2), 61–74.Google Scholar
Russell, M., O’Dwyer, L. M., & Miranda, H. (2009). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions in algebra: Results from an experimental pilot study. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 414–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sáenz, C. (2009). The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA). Educational Studies in Math, 711, 123–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Publié par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye. avec la colaboration de Albert Riedlinger. Paris: Payot, 1965.Google Scholar
Schäfer, R. & Sayatz, U. (2017): Wie viel Grammatik braucht das Germanistikstudium?. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik. 42(2), 221–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Socas Robayna, M. M. (1997). Dificultades, obstáculos y errores en el aprendizaje de las Matemáticas en la Educación Secundaria. En L. Rico et al. (Eds.), La educación matemática en la Enseñanza Secundaria (pp. 125–154). Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates. (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 147–165). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Trotzke, A. & Kupisch, T. (2020). Formal linguistics and language education: Bridging the gap. In A. Trotzke & T. Kupisch. (Eds.), Formal Linguistics and Language Education (pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rijt, J., & Coppen, P. -A. (2017). Bridging the gap between linguistic theory and L1 grammar education –experts’ views on essential linguistic concepts. Language Awareness, 26(4), 360–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rijt, J., De Swart, P., & Coppen, P. -A. (2018). Linguistic concepts in L1 Grammar education: A systematic literature review. Research Papers in Education, 34(5), 621–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rijt, J., De Swart, P., Wijnands, A., & Coppen, P. -A. (2019). When students tackle grammatical problems. Exploring linguistic reasoning with linguistic metaconcepts in L1 grammar education. Linguistics and Education, 521, 78–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, R. S. (2010). From cold shoulder to funded welcome: lessons from the trenches of dialectally diverse classrooms. In K. Denham, & A. Lobeck. (Eds.), (pp. 129–148). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijnands, A., van Rijt, J. & Coppen, P. -A. (2021). Learning to think about language step by step: a pedagogical template for the development of cognitive and reflective thinking skills in L1 grammar education. Language Awareness, 301, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizena, M., Doormana, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584.Google Scholar