Article in:
Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Second language grammar learning in refugee children

Is group dictation an effective teaching technique?

| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
| University of Konstanz | University of Reading
This exploratory study aims to investigate the effectiveness of group dictation in primary school children with a refugee background. More specifically, running dictation was employed in the teaching of two grammatical phenomena in L2 Greek, tense and gender agreement. Two studies were conducted to investigate each grammatical structure separately. Each study consisted of a pre-test that investigated the pupils’ performance on the grammatical structure, the teaching intervention via running dictation, and a post-test that explored its efficiency on pupils’ accuracy. All pupils that participated in the studies were enrolled in formal Greek education and their L1s were Arabic, Farsi or Kurdish. According to the results from both studies, the children’s post-intervention performance did not improve significantly. However, the pupils’ accuracy on some of the grammatical forms tested as well as their error patterns indicated that running dictation helped the pupils notice the target grammatical phenomena and thus become more aware of them. Moreover, some data showed that older pupils benefited more from the target-activity than younger ones. Therefore, the present study provides evidence that running dictation may have a positive qualitative rather than quantitative impact on learners’ grammatical development and is dependent on the pupils’ age.
Keywords: L2 grammar teaching, running dictation, refugees, gender agreement, tense, Greek
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Second language grammar teaching
      • 1.1.1Group dictation
    • 1.2Grammatical phenomena under study
      • 1.2.1Tense
      • 1.2.2Article-noun gender agreement
    • 1.3Factors affecting L2 grammar performance
    • 1.4Research questions
  • 2.First study: Tense
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Material
        • Teaching intervention
        • Pre-/post-test
      • 2.1.3Procedure
    • 2.2Results
    • 2.3Discussion
  • 3.Second study: Article-noun gender agreement
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Material
        • Teaching intervention
        • Pre-/post-test
      • 3.1.3Procedure
    • 3.2Results
    • 3.3Discussion
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 30 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.21012.oli
References
Agathopoulou, E., Papadopoulou, D., & Zmijanjac, K.
(2008) Noun-adjective agreement in L2 Greek and the effect of input-based instruction. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24 1, 9–33.Google Scholar
Aisyah, L., & Hidayani, R.
(2018) Applying running dictation strategy to improve the students’ speaking ability in IX-B class students at Medan State SMP 28 Medan. In J. Sitompul, S. M. Hutagalung, H. Fibriasari, E. Syahrin, T. K. Sari, A. S. Perdamean, & W. Sa’dah. (Eds.), Proceedings International Seminar on Foreign Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature (pp. 144–150). Medan: State University of Medan.Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García Mayo. (Eds.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, A., Ralli, A., & Chila-Markopoulou, D.
(2003) Το γένος [The gender]. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Badawi, E., Carter, M., & Gully, A.
(2016) Modern written Arabic: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Basta, J.
(2011) The role of the communicative approach and cooperative learning in higher education. Linguistics and Literature, 9 (2), 125–143.Google Scholar
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
(2020a) Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing tasks: an expository study. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2 (1), 52–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020b) Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30 (1), 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020c) Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writing task. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch. (Eds.), Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 20–39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charalabopoulou, F., & Gavrilidou, M.
(2012) Creating frequency-based vocabulary lists for L2 learners. In Z. Gavriilidou, A. Efthymiou, E. Thomadaki, & P. Kambakis-Vougiouklis. (Eds.), Selected papers of the 10th ICGL (pp.195–201). Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Martzoukou, M., & Stavrakaki, S.
(2010) The perfective past tense in Greek as a second language. Second Language Research, 26 (4), 501–525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2018) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Daskalaki, E., Chondrogianni, V., Blom, E., & Argyri, F.
(2019) Input effects across domains: The case of Greek subjects in child heritage language. Second Language Research, 35 (3), 421–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, I., & Papadopoulou, D.
(2019) The role of educational setting in the development of verbal aspect and executive functions: evidence from Greek-German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23 (8), 964–980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2016) Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20 (3), 405–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
(2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 (2), 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraine, N., & McDade, R.
(2009) Reducing bias in psychometric assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students from refugee backgrounds in Australian schools: A process approach. Australian Psychologist, 44 (1), 16–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A.
(2019) Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80 1, 165–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, M., & Ellis, R.
(2019) The relative effects of metalinguistic explanation and direct written corrective feedback on children’s grammatical accuracy in new writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1 (1), 57–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gustiani, M., & Yulia, H.
(2018) Running dictation technique and learning motivation: Their effects on students’ listening comprehension achievement. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 5 (2), 76–83.Google Scholar
Holton, D., Mackridge, P., Philippaki-Warburton, I., & Spyropoulos, V.
(2012) Greek: a comprehensive grammar (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Indah, O. D.
(2019) Students’ perception on running dictation method in ESP classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 7 (1), 16–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, G., & Small, J.
(2003) Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix, 3 (1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Jalbout, M.
(2020) Finding solutions to Greece’s refugee education crisis. London: Theirworld.Google Scholar
Kagan, S., & Kagan, M.
(2009) Kagan cooperative learning. California: Kagan.Google Scholar
Kaltsa, M., Prentza, A., Papadopoulou, D., & Tsimpli, I. M.
(2017) Language external and language internal factors in the acquisition of gender: The case of Albanian-Greek and English-Greek bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23 (8), 981–1002. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khezrlou, S.
(2021) Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition. The Language Learning Journal, 49 (5), 568–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2011) Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15 (2), 183–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2002) The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (3–4), 343–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J.
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8 (1), 55–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. DeBot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2004) Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of French Language Studies, 14 (3), 321–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mace, J.
(2016) Persian grammar. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitakidou, S., & Tressou, E.
(2005) Stories from a Greek reception class: An integrated curriculum approach. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (pp. 1630–1644). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S.
(2011) Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. New York: Routlege. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nurdianingsih, F., & Rahmawati, O. I.
(2018) Running dictation as an effective technique on the teaching writing skill. ELLiC Proceedings, 21, 127–131.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, D.
(2005) Η παραγωγή της ρηματικής όψης από σπουδαστές της ελληνικής ως δεύτερης/ξένης γλώσσας [The production of verbal aspect in adult L2 learners of Greek]. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21 1, 39–54.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Soto-Corominas, A., Chen, X., & Gottardo, A.
(2020) How language environment, age, and cognitive capacity support the bilingual development of Syrian refugee children recently arrived in Canada. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41 (6), 1255–1281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(1994) Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44 (3), 493–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A.
(2011) Children learning second languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Qin, J.
(2008) The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisition of the English passive voice. Language Teaching Research, 12 (1), 61–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 129–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scrivener, J.
(2011) Learning teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simard, D.
(2009) Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37 (1), 124–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L.
(2015) The educational and mental health needs of Syrian refugee children. Washington: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Sousa, L. P. Q., Tiraboschi, F. F., Lago, N. A., & Figueiredo, F. J. Q.
(2019) Collaborative English language learning: Some reflections from interactions between pairs. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 58 (1), 259–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spyropoulos, V., & Revithiadou, A.
(2009) The morphology of past in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics, 29 1, 108–122.Google Scholar
Storch, N.
(2016) Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda. (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terzopoulos, A. R., Duncan, L. G., Wilson, M. A., Niolaki, G. Z., & Masterson, J.
(2017) HelexKids: A word frequency database for Greek and Cypriot primary school children. Behavior Research Methods, 49 1, 83–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thackston, W. M.
(2016) An introduction to Persian. Bethesda: Ibex Publishers.Google Scholar
The Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture
(2007) School’s in for refugees: Whole-school guide to refugee readiness. Brunswick: The Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S.
(1997) Reformulation and reconstruction: Tasks that promote ‘noticing’. ELT Journal, 51 (4), 326–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tzevelekou, M., Giagkou, M., Kantzou, V., Stamouli, S., Papadopoulou, D., & Anastasiadi-Symeonidi, A.
(2013) Μιλάς ελληνικά Ι & ΙΙ [Do you speak Greek I & II]. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(2020, June 18). Figures at a glance. Retrieved from https://​www​.unhcr​.org​/figures​-at​-a​-glance​.html
Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. M.
(2014) The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35 (4), 765–805. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Uludag, O.
(2011) Transfer of training and processing instruction: From input to output. System, 39 (1), 44–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S., & Triantafillidou, L.
(2003) Proficiency levels in Greek as a second language. Athens: University of Athens.Google Scholar
Wajnryb, R.
(1990) Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whiteside, K. E., Gooch, D., & Norbury, C. F.
(2017) English language proficiency and early school attainment among children learning English as an additional language. Child Development, 88 (3), 812–827. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J.
(2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yaşar, M. R., & Amac, Z.
(2018) Teaching Syrian students in Turkish schools: Experiences of teachers. Sustainable Multilingualism, 13 (1), 225–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yolanda, D.
(2019) The effect of running dictation method on students’ writing ability in procedure text: A study at the XIth grade students of SMA Negeri 6 Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Liner, 2 (3), 40–57.Google Scholar
Zakiyah, I. S., & Husniah, R.
(2017) The effect of running dictation towards students spelling in writing short functional text at SMP Islamic Qon. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 22–28.Google Scholar
Zulraudah, Z., & Jufri, J.
(2014) Teaching writing by using running dictation activity for elementary school students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 3 (1), 58–63.Google Scholar
Second language grammar learning in refugee children