Commentary published in:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp. 174180
DeKeyser, R. M.
(1995) Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17 (3), 379–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (2), 305–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27 (2), 141–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2021) Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31 (2), 229–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Y., & Thompson, P.
(2021) Communicative data-driven learning: a two-year pilot study. ELT Journal. Crossref, in press .Google Scholar
Jäschke, K., & Plag, I.
(2016) The dative alternation in German-English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (3), 485–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenset, G. B., McGillivray, B., & Rundell, M.
(2018) The dative alternation revisited. Fresh insights from contemporary British spoken data. In V. Brezina, R. Love, & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Corpus approaches to contemporary British speech. Sociolinguistic studies of the spoken BNC2014 (pp. 185–208). Oxon and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2003) Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Lin, M. H.
(2021) Effects of data-driven learning on college students of different grammar proficiencies: A preliminary empirical assessment in EFL classes. SAGE Open Journal, online, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lo, M. L., & Marton, F.
(2012) Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1 (1), 7–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llopis-García, R.
(2010) Why cognitive grammar works in the classroom. A case study of mood selection in Spanish. AILA Review, 23 (1), 72–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madlener, K.
(2015) Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 291. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H.
(2017) Grammar acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed language acquisition (pp. 205–223). New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, G.
(2017) Exploring Variation Theory in form-focused language teaching. Teaching the present perfect in upper secondary EFL. CELT Matters (Centre for English Language Teaching), 11, 9–29. https://​celt​.univie​.ac​.at​/fileadmin​/user​_upload​/proj​_fdz​_englisch​/Ott​_2017​_upload​_version​.pdf
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(2002) The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (11), 456–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N.
(2012) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33 (4), 829–856. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1993) Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26 (4), 435–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M. J., & Ionin, T.
(2021) Does explicit instruction affect L2 linguistic competence? An examination with L2 acquisition of English inverse scope. Second Language Research, 1 (31), online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar