Commentary published in:
Pedagogical Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2022) ► pp. 166173
References
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2015) Designing instructional effect studies for L2 pragmatics: A guide for teachers and researchers. In S. Gesuato, F. Bianchi, & W. Cheng (Eds.) Teaching, learning and investigating pragmatics: Principles, methods and practices (pp. 135–164). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Mossman, S., & Su, Y.
(2017) The effect of corpus-based instruction on pragmatic routines. Language Learning & Technology 21(3): 76–103.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Stringer, D.
(2017) Unconventional expressions: Productive syntax in the L2 acquisition of formulaic language. Second Language Research, 33(1): 61–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., & Lindstromberg, S.
(2006) Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals, and evaluation. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 305–355). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2010) Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E.
(2010) Explaining how learners extract ‘formulae’ from L2 input. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11: 229–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A. E.
(2005) Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to children. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
De Knop, S.
& Meunier, F. (2015) The ‘learner corpus research, cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition’ nexus: A SWOT analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(2015) The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C.
(2003) Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, C.
(2005) Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? TESLEJ, 8(4), 1–35.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2021) Using corpora to foster L2 construction learning: A data-driven learning experiment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 229–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2022) Cognitive corpus linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, VOL: pages. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gradman, H.
(1971) The limitations of contrastive analysis predictions. Proceedings of the Pacific Conference on Contrastive Linguistics and Language Universals (PCCLLU): University of Hawai’i Working Papers in Linguistics 3/41: 11–16. University of Hawai’i.radman.Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y.
(2021) A psycholinguistically motivated methodology for task-based language teaching. In M. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp. 305–325). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Lightfoot, D.
(1981) Introduction. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp. 9–31). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W.
(1997) The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.
(2013, 4th ed.). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S. & Boers, F.
(2008) Teaching chunks of language: From noticing to remembering. Innsbruck: Helbling Languages.Google Scholar
Long, M.
(2015) Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 60–73). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nash, H., & Snowling, M.
(2006) Teaching new words to children with poor existing vocabulary knowledge: A controlled evaluation of the definition and context methods. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(3), 335–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 501, 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B.
(2003) Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
(2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 691, 652–708. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, J.
(1974) An error in error analysis. Language Learning 24(2): 205–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R.
(2013) Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 137–158). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seuss, Dr
(1957) The cat in the hat. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R.
(2013) Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63(2), 296–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2008) Meaning in the second language. New York/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stahl, S.
(2005) Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of instruction). In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 95–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stringer, D.
(2019) Lexical semantics: Relativity and transfer. In Erdogan, N. & Wei, M. (Eds.), Applied linguistics for teachers of culturally and linguistically diverse learners (pp. 180–203). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C.
(2011) Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. Language Learning 61(2): 569–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A., Huang, L., & Jan, H.
(2018) (Eds.). What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from current SLA research. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S.
(Eds.) (2020) Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar