References (45)
Alexander, L. G.
(2005) Longman English Grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y.
(1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.
(2000) Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Comajoan-Colomé, L.
(2022) The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching, 55 1, 289–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W.
(1995) The role of lexcial aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(2021) Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M.
(2011) Teaching English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1 (3), 365–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2009) Input effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 418–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casalosa, M.
(2005) When less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of support. Child Development, 76 1, 279–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comajoan-Colomé, L., & Llop Naya, A.
(2021) An SLA-informed and cognitive linguistic approach to the teaching of L2 Catalan tense-aspect. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 87 1, 95–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D.
(2017) The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants: Evidence from that-clauses in Polish. Cognitive Science, 41 1, 354–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D., Testini, I., & Milin, P.
Under revision). On the nature and organistion of morphological categories: verbal aspect through the lens of associative learning. Morphology.
Ellis, N. C.
(2006a) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied linguistics, 27 (1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied linguistics, 27 (2), 164–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F.
(2009) Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 370–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ez-Zizi, A., Divjak, D., & Milin, P.
(2023) Error-correction mechanisms in language learning: Modeling individuals. Language Learning, Ahead of print. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R., Götz, S., & Werner, V.
(2016) The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In V. Werner, E. Seoane, & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G.
(2022) Cognitive linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical Linguistics, 3 (2), 109–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N.
(2004) Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (3), 289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Götz, S., Werner, V., & Fuchs, R.
(2019) Temporal adverbials in the acquisition of past-time reference: A cross-sectional study of L1 German and Cantonese learners of English. In A. Abel, A. Glaznieks, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening the scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference (pp. 43–70). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Infante, P., & Poehner, M. E.
(2021) Alex, the toolmaker: Tool-and-result activity in the L2 learning context. Linguistics and Education, 63 (100862). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, N. D.
(2018) The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach ENglish conditionals. Applied linguistics, 39 (5), 668–693.Google Scholar
Kermer, F.
(2016) A Cognitive Grammar Approach to Teaching Tense and Aspect in the L2 Context. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M.
(2016) The Grammar Book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd Ed.). Boston: Heinle Cengage.Google Scholar
Leech, G.
(1992) 100 million words of English: The British National Corpus (BNC). Second Language Research, 28 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Li, P., & Shirai, Y.
(2000) The acquisition of lexcial and grammatical aspect. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(1987) The Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Niemeier, S., & Reif, M.
(2008) Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL classroom. In S. D. Knop & T. D. Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 325–356). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A.
(1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26 1, 619–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, I.
(1927) Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.
(1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reif, M.
(2012) Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Romain, L., Ez-Zizi, A., Milin, P., & Divjak, D.
(2022) What makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and aspect. Cognitive Linguistics, 33 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. M.
(2008) Marking past tense in Second Language Acquisition. A theoretical model. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W.
(1995) The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71 (4), 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F.
(1957) Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svalberg, A. M.-L.
(2007) Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40 (4), 287–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Mapping tense form and meaning for L2 learning – from theory to practice. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 57 (4), 417–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A., & Carapella, J.
(2004) Syntactic-semantic interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child Language, 31 1, 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2012) Input effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5 year olds. Journal of Memory and Language, 66 (3), 458–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. J.
(2009) The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Year, J.
(2009) Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of input frequency and distribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York.
Year, J., & Gordon, P.
(2009) Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 399–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar