Article published In:
Pedagogical Linguistics: Online-First ArticlesThe types of cues that help you learn
Pedagogical implications of a computational simulation on learning the English tense/aspect system from exposure
Despite a considerable amount of research conducted on the development of tense/aspect (TA) usage in English by
second language (L2) learners, nuances in uses of TAs remain elusive to many L2 learners of English: the grammatical accounts
proposed appear difficult to apply as they are either too general or too specific and fail to provide learners with a conceptual
understanding of the system. Merging insights from psychological models of learning, corpus-based, and cognitive linguistics
approaches to second language acquisition we use the results of computational simulations of learning of the TA system conducted
by Romain et al. (2022) and propose an approach to TA teaching that focuses on the cues
that have been identified as crucial for accurate TA use. Our pedagogical approach draws learners’ attention not so much to the
cues themselves but to the type of cues that are the most reliable in the choice of different TA combinations. This approach
allows teachers to equip learners with a long-term learning strategy that will help them focus on the most useful type of
information, and thus gradually build up a bank of knowledge specific to each TA combination.
Article outline
- 1.The role of frequency and association in learning
- a.Construction learning: Frequency and association
- b.TA learning: Aspect, tense, associations
- 2.Associative computational learning
- a.Rescorla-Wagner and its uses in learning
- b.The model: Data and specifications
- 3.Results and discussion of the learning simulations
- a.TA combinations: Simple vs. complex
- b.Cues: Which elements facilitate learning
- 4.L2 teaching/learning of TA combinations: How to apply these findings in the classroom
- 5.Conclusions
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
Published online: 11 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.23003.rom
https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.23003.rom
References (45)
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). The
primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole
connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense
and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and
use. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Comajoan-Colomé, L. (2022). The
relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second
language tense-aspect. Language
Teaching,
55
1, 289–345.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. (1995). The
role of lexcial aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL
Quarterly,
29
(1), 107–131.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar
of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bielak, J., & Pawlak, M. (2011). Teaching
English tense and aspect with the help of cognitive grammar: An empirical study. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching,
1
(3), 365–400.
Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2009). Input
effects within a constructionist framework. The Modern Language
Journal,
93
(3), 418–429.
Casalosa, M. (2005). When
less is more: How infants learn to form an abstract categorical representation of
support. Child
Development,
76
1, 279–290.
Comajoan-Colomé, L., & Llop Naya, A. (2021). An
SLA-informed and cognitive linguistic approach to the teaching of L2 Catalan
tense-aspect. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la
Comunicación,
87
1, 95–120.
Divjak, D. (2017). The
role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants: Evidence from that-clauses in
Polish. Cognitive
Science,
41
1, 354–382.
Divjak, D., Testini, I., & Milin, P. (Under
revision). On the nature and organistion of morphological categories: verbal aspect through
the lens of associative learning. Morphology.
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language
acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied
linguistics,
27
(1), 1–24.
(2006b). Selective
attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing,
blocking and perceptual learning. Applied
linguistics,
27
(2), 164–194.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction
learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language
Journal,
93
(3), 370–385.
Ez-Zizi, A., Divjak, D., & Milin, P. (2023). Error-correction
mechanisms in language learning: Modeling individuals. Language Learning, Ahead of
print.
Fuchs, R., Götz, S., & Werner, V. (2016). The
present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and
writing. In V. Werner, E. Seoane, & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing
the Present Perfect. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Gilquin, G. (2022). Cognitive
linguistics and pedagogy: From rationale to applications. Pedagogical
Linguistics,
3
(2), 109–142.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning
argument structure generalizations. Cognitive
Linguistics,
15
(3), 289–316.
Götz, S., Werner, V., & Fuchs, R. (2019). Temporal
adverbials in the acquisition of past-time reference: A cross-sectional study of L1 German and Cantonese learners of
English. In A. Abel, A. Glaznieks, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening
the scope of Learner Corpus Research. Selected papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research
Conference (pp. 43–70). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending
collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal
of Corpus
Linguistics,
9
(1), 97–129.
Infante, P., & Poehner, M. E. (2021). Alex,
the toolmaker: Tool-and-result activity in the L2 learning context. Linguistics and
Education,
63
(100862).
Jacobsen, N. D. (2018). The
best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach ENglish
conditionals. Applied
linguistics,
39
(5), 668–693.
Kermer, F. (2016). A
Cognitive Grammar Approach to Teaching Tense and Aspect in the L2
Context. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2016). The
Grammar Book: Form, meaning, and use for English language teachers (3rd
Ed.). Boston: Heinle Cengage.
Leech, G. (1992). 100
million words of English: The British National Corpus (BNC). Second Language
Research,
28
1, 1–13.
Li, P., & Shirai, Y. (2000). The
acquisition of lexcial and grammatical
aspect. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The
Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms
of Language
Acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Niemeier, S., & Reif, M. (2008). Making
progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching in the German EFL
classroom. In S. D. Knop & T. D. Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive
Approaches to Pedagogical
Grammar (pp. 325–356). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking
verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child
Language,
26
1, 619–653.
Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned
reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral
cortex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reif, M. (2012). Making
progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Romain, L., Ez-Zizi, A., Milin, P., & Divjak, D. (2022). What
makes the past perfect and the future progressive? Experiential coordinates for a learnable, context-based model of tense and
aspect. Cognitive
Linguistics,
33
(2).
Salaberry, R. M. (2008). Marking
past tense in Second Language Acquisition. A theoretical
model. London: Continuum.
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The
acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype
account. Language,
71
(4), 743–762.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions:
Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics,
8
(2), 209–243.
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2007). Language
awareness and language learning. Language
Teaching,
40
(4), 287–308.
(2019). Mapping
tense form and meaning for L2 learning – from theory to practice. International Review of
Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching,
57
(4), 417–455.
Weist, R. M., Pawlak, A., & Carapella, J. (2004). Syntactic-semantic
interface in the acquisition of verb morphology. Journal of Child
Language,
31
1, 31–60.
Wonnacott, E., Boyd, J. K., Thomson, J., & Goldberg, A. E. (2012). Input
effects on the acquisition of a novel phrasal construction in 5 year olds. Journal of Memory
and
Language,
66
(3), 458–478.
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. J. (2009). The
acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern
Language
Journal,
93
(3), 354–369.
Year, J. (2009). Korean
speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of input frequency and
distribution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbia University, New York.