This paper presents a discussion of the treatment of the pragmatic functions Topic and Focus in Functional Grammar (Dik: 1989, ch. 13). Two questions will be addressed: (a) the theoretical question of how the interface between the static grammar (dealing with a discourse as the product of text-creating activity) and the dynamic theory of verbal interaction (dealing with discourse as the ongoing text-creating process itself) is handled with regard to pragmatic functions; and (b) the practical question whether the reader of Dik (1989) finds a set of proposals that can be operationalized in the analysis of linguistic material. With regard to the former question we conclude that in the present FG treatment of Topic and Focus, the static and the dynamic approaches do not connect and that, as a result, the speaker’s selection of constituents for Topic or Focus function is left unaccounted for. As for the second question, we show that Dik’s proposal can be put into practice, but that the resultant analysis suffers from a number of inconsistencies and unclarities. Finally, we argue that most of these inconsistencies and unclarities can be solved if (1) we accept a different classification of Focus, and (2) assume that Topic assignment is irrelevant in English, as there is no consistent way in which Topic constituents are given special treatment, and Pl-placement can be accounted for without having to resort to Topic function.
Beaugrande, R.-A. de and W.U. Dressler (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
Brown, G. and G. Yule (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: CUP. BoP
Carpenter, P.A. and M.A. Just (1977) Integrative processes in comprehension. In D. LaBerge & S.J. Samuels (eds.), Basic processes in reading: perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 217-241.
Chafe, W.L. (1976) Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view. In C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 25-57.
Clark, H.H. and S.E. Haviland (1977) Comprehension and the Given-New contract. In R.O. Freedle (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1-40.
Cruse, D.A. (1980) Review of Hawkins (1978), Definiteness and indefiniteness. Journal of Linguistics 161: 308-316.
Dik, S.C. (1989) The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1. Dordrecht: Foris.
Dik, S.C. (forthcoming) The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2.
Ebert, K.H. (1971) Referenz, Sprechsituation und die bestimmten Artikel in einem nordfriesischen Dialekt (Fering). Bräist/Bredstedt: Nordfriisk Instituut.
Groot, C. de (1981) Sentence intertwining in Hungarian. In A.M. Bolkestein, H.A. Combé, S.C. Dik, C. de Groot, J. Gvozdanovic, A. Rijksbaron & C. Vet (eds.), Predication and expression in Functional Grammar. London: Academic Press, 41-62.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman. BoP
Hannay, M. (1983) The Focus function in Functional Grammar: questions of contrast and context. In S.C. Dik (ed.), Advances in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 207-223.
Hannay, M. (1985a) Inferrability, discourse-boundness, and sub-topics. In A.M. Bolkestein, C. de Groot & J.L. Mackenzie (eds.), Syntax and pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 49-63. BoP
Hannay, M. (1985b) English existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. BoP
Hannay, M. (1990) Pragmatic function assignment and word order variation in a Functional Grammar of English. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 38. To appear in Journal of Pragmatics.
Jong, J.R. de (1981) On the treatment of Focus phenomena in Functional Grammar. In T. Hoekstra, H. van der Hulst & M. Moortgat (eds.), Perspectives on Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 89-115.
Löbner, S. (1985) Definites. Journal of Semantics 41: 279-326.
Prince, E.F. (1981) Toward a taxonomy of Given-New information. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223-255.
Sanford, A.J. and S.C. Garrod (1981) Understanding written language: explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester: Wiley.
2017. Initial vs. non-initial placement of agent constructions in spoken clauses: A corpus-based study of language production under time pressure. Language Sciences 64 ► pp. 16 ff.
Gentens, Caroline
2016. The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Journal of Pragmatics 96 ► pp. 15 ff.
Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2016. The discourse-motivated potential of view-point adverbs in -wise: A Functional Discourse Grammar perspective. Lingua 184 ► pp. 1 ff.
2005. The introduction of topics in two discourse genres. <i>WORD</i> 56:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
GUIJARRO, ARSENIO JESúS MOYA & JOSé IGNACIO ALBENTOSA HERNáNDEZ
2001. Points of departure in news items and tourist brochures: Choices of theme and topic. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 21:3
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.