Disagreements in television discussions
How small can small screen arguments be?
Based on a case study, this paper explores the interaction between the act of disagreeing and the contextual parameters of Greek television panel discussions. The analysis of the data reveals that, in contrast to previous literature on disagreements in TV interview situations, the disagreements at hand are both (host)-unmediated and rendered less dispreferred by being delayed, indirectly posed, and/or mitigated. The discussion sheds light on the systematic ways in which the above is sequentially achieved so as to suit the parameters of the given context. It is argued that the preference features that accompany disagreements attend to the specialized floor-holding and turn-taking rights as well as to the public occasion of the interactions. As such, they index the participants’ management and negotiation of their roles and identities as interviewees, interlocutors, and public speakers.
Keywords: Disagreements, (Dis)preference, Mediated/institutional context, Participant roles and identities, Face
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
Published online: 01 September 2000
(1996) Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29: 315–345. BoP
(1997) Dinner talk. Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. BoP
Brand, G. & P. Scannell
Brown, P. and S. Levinson
Drew, P. and J. Heritage
(1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65. BoP
(1995) Media discourse. London: Arnold. BoP
(1997a) Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: The style- and code-switches of Greek messages. Internationaljournal of Applied Linguistics 7: 141–164. BoP
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
(1996) Politeness in conflict management: A conversation anlysis of dispreferred messages from a cognitive perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 227–255. BoP
Heritage. J. & D. Greatbatch
(1991) On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 93–137. BoP
Hill, J.H. & J.T. Irvine
(1997) Building alignments in public debate: A case study from British TV. Text 17.2: 161–79. BoP
(1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193–216. BoP
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Livingstone, S. and P. Lunt
(1994) Talk on television: Audience participation and public debate. London: Routledge. BoP
(1985) Agreement and disagreement in conversations and letters. Text 5: 201–227. BoP
(in preparation) Constructing the expert in Greek television discussion programs. Ph.D thesis. King’s College London.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Maison des Sciences de 1’ Homme and Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101. BoP
(1984) Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13: 311–335. BoP
(1992) Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press. BoP
(1997) Politeness and off-record indirectness. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 163–179. BoP
Cited by 16 other publications
No author info given
Cheng, Winnie & Amy B.M. Tsui
Gialabouki, Lena & Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
Jorfi, Leyli, Hamid Reza Dowlatabadi, Mark Vicars & Mark Vicars
Jørgensen, Annette Myre & Inés Olza
Koutsombogera, Maria & Harris Papageorgiou
Wang, Yufang, Shu-ing Shyu, Wayne Schams & Hsun-Chen Chen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.