The modular approach to language in its career of 30 years had alternating and rivaling views regarding the place of pragmatics. A first approach basically is the one outlined by Fodor (1983) that would pack pragmatic aspects of language use under the rubric of the mushy General Problem Solver component of the architecture, thus extracting it from considerations of modularity altogether. The rival Massive Modular approaches such as Dan Sperber’s would be willing to treat pragmatic aspects as one crucial module as part of a general architecture with modularity all over the place.
The paper after summarizing the theoretical interpretations calls for a less dedicated distributed processing and representation system where modularity rather than a simple starting point might be seen as the result of a process of modularization. Three types of empirical data are surveyed. First, studies that seem to support a specialized pragmatic module are discussed, namely from right hemisphere damaged populations and brain imaging data that imply a strong involvement of right hemisphere in a variety of pragmatic aspects from emotional stress to understanding non-literal language. A second line of data comes from developmental neuroscience considerations. Studies with autistic and other cognitively challenged populations suffering from a presupposed overall architectural deficit indicate the crucial role of a Theory of Mind not only in tasks of second order representation, in attributing a sophisticated Belief-Intention system to others, but in language processing as well. One interpretation of these data is to postulate a module of social and psychological cognition, that would be a driving source of language use. The primacy of language use should be left open as an option. It is possible that language use itself and thus language pragmatics in different intentional contexts is partly responsible for the development of the seemingly encapsulated system of mentalization. This would correspond to the general idea of early prepared systems being modified during an interface buildup process in development that roughly corresponds to an overall use of language for metacognitive purposes.
A third line evidence calling for a balanced treatment of the modularity issue comes from theories of Paleobiology. Theories like the ones proposed by Donald, Mithen, Wilkins and Wakefield should also be considered in this regard. According to these theories human language may actually have resulted from a loosening of boundaries between encapsulated modules, rather then from strengthening them. This line of reasoning is especially interesting since it supports the idea that human language emerges by necessity as the result of an interaction between different “intelligences’“, together with elementary societal organization and a social mind.
(1985) Brain language. On a book by Jerry A. Fodor. Folia Linguistica 1985.191: 539–548.
(1984) Computation and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Reboul, A., and J. Moeschler
(1998a) Pragmatique du discours. Paris: Armand Colin. BoP
Reboul, A., and J. Moeschler
(1998b) La pragmatuque aujourd’hui. Paris: Seuil.
(1975) Notes on a schema for stories. In D.G. Bobrow and A.N. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding. New York: Academic Press, pp. 211–236.
Saffran, E.M., and A. Sholl
(1999) Clues to the functional and neural architecture of word meaning. In CM. Brown and P. Haggort (eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–272.
Schank, R., and R.P. Abelson
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. BoP
School, B.J., and P.D. Tremoulet
(2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 41: 299–309.
Sirigu, A., T. Cohen, T. Zalla, P. Pradat-Diehl, P. van Eeckhout, and J. Grafman
(1998) Distinct frontal regions for processing sentence syntax and story grammar. Cortex 341: 771–778.
Sirigu, A., T. Zalla, B.Pillon, J.Grafman, Y. Agid, and B. Dubois
(1996) Encoding of Sequence and bundaries of scripts following prefrontal lesions. Cortex 321: 297–310.
(1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell. BoP
(2000) Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2000) Language and understanding minds: Connections in autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg and D.J. Cohen (eds.), Understanding other minds. Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–149.
Tanenhaus, M.K., G. Carlson, and J.C. Trueswell
(1989) The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 41: 211–234.
Thuma, O., and Cs. Pléh
(1995) Kétértelmuségek feldolgozâsa két nyelv között. (Ambiguity resolution between two languages) Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 511:28-40.
Thuma, O., and Cs. Pléh
(1999) Ambiguous data on Hungarian ambiguity resolution. In M. Prinzhorn and J. Rennison (eds.), Dressier Festschrift.
(1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Van Lancker, D., and N.A. Pachana
(1998) The influence of emotions on language and communication disorders. In B. Stemmer and H.A. Whittaker (eds.), Handbook ofneurolinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 301–311.
Wodak, R., W.U. Dressier, and Cs. Pléh
(1984) Geschlechtsspezifisches Sprachverhalten von Aphatikern auf der Textebene. In W.U. Dressler and R. Wodak (eds.), Patholinguistische Studien. Hamburg: Buschke.
Zalla, T, A.Sirigu, B.Pillon, B.Dubois, J. Grafman, and Y. Agid
(1998) Deficit in evaluating pre-determinated sequences of script events in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Cortex 341: 621–628.
Zalla, T., A. Sirigu, B. Pillon, B. Dubois, Y. Agid, and J. Grafman
(in press) How patients with Parkinson’s disease retrieve and manage action knowledge?Cortex.
Cited by 10 other publications
Forgács, Bálint, Ágnes Lukács & Csaba Pléh
2014. Lateralized processing of novel metaphors: Disentangling figurativeness and novelty. Neuropsychologia 56 ► pp. 101 ff.
Forgács, Bálint & Csaba Pléh
2022. The Fluffy Metaphors of Climate Science. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 447 ff.
Győri, Miklós, Lukács, Ágnes & Pléh, Csaba
2004. Towards the Understanding of the Neurogenesis of Social Cognition: Evidence from Impaired Populations. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 2:3 ► pp. 261 ff.
2002. Wolfgang U. Dressler–Oskar E. Pfeiffer–Markus Pöchträger–John R. Rennison (eds): Morphological analysis in comparison. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory Vol. 201. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 49:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
2020. Redefining pragmatic competence among modular interactions and beyond. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:5 ► pp. 605 ff.
2023. Pragmatic competence, autistic language use and the basic properties of human language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Németh T., Enikő
2004. The principles of communicative language use. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 51:3-4 ► pp. 379 ff.
2019. Fuzzy Boundaries in Interpretation: Empirical Study on the Common Traits and Differences of Irony and Metaphor as the Hypothesized Infringements of the Maxim of Quality. In Fuzzy Boundaries in Discourse Studies, ► pp. 151 ff.
2022. Preschoolers’ Sensitivity to the Infringement of Conversational Maxims in View of Mentalization. In A Life in Cognition [Language, Cognition, and Mind, 11], ► pp. 137 ff.
Schnell, Zsuzsanna, Eszter Varga, Tamás Tényi, Mária Simon, András Hajnal, Róbert Járai & Róbert Herold
2016. Neuropragmatics and irony processing in schizophrenia – Possible neural correlates of the meta-module of pragmatic meaning construction. Journal of Pragmatics 92 ► pp. 74 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.